Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,337 Year: 3,594/9,624 Month: 465/974 Week: 78/276 Day: 6/23 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Mutation Rates Change Natural Selection for Genes
wnope
Inactive Member


Message 1 of 3 (265105)
12-02-2005 5:39 PM


Title: Mutation Rates Change Natural Selection for Genes
According to a recent University of Chicago study, the amount of mutations accepted by natural selection can differ depending on the ration of neutral (referred to as synonymous mutation [Ks]) and mutations which do effect protein structure, nonsynonymous (Ka).
By comparing the ration of Ka/Ks in any particular gene, a coefficient can be derived that defines the selection pressure on that gene. A low ration signifies high selection, and high ratio signifies weak selection.
Pseudogenes, for instance, have a ration of 1, meaning the mutations are accepted at the same rate of natural selection since the gene is functionless.
quote:
The new data show that if more mutations show up at a gene, that gene tends to accept a higher percentage of those mutations.
"A gene under strong mutational pressure succumbs to that pressure," Lahn said. "For genes that have a high mutation rate, somehow selection appears to become less stringent."
quote:
"Lahn and his associates have found a most striking result, one that is totally unexpected," said geneticist James Crow, professor emeritus of genetics and zoology at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. "If this result is indeed confirmed it would cast doubt on use of this ratio [Ka/Ks] as an indicator of selection."

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by mick, posted 12-04-2005 8:14 PM wnope has not replied

  
Adminnemooseus
Administrator
Posts: 3974
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 2 of 3 (265106)
12-02-2005 5:42 PM


Topic promoted from message 4 of "Proposed New Topic" Possibly the next Paradigm Shift in Evolutionary Theory.
Adminnemooseus
Added by edit - This link was in the original version of the proposed topic:
University of Chicago study overturns convent | EurekAlert!
This message has been edited by Adminnemooseus, 12-02-2005 05:47 PM

  
mick
Member (Idle past 5005 days)
Posts: 913
Joined: 02-17-2005


Message 3 of 3 (265545)
12-04-2005 8:14 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by wnope
12-02-2005 5:39 PM


I am puzzled
Hi,
I'm a bit puzzled by the press release cited. I don't quite understand how they calculated mutation rate. Are they just reporting a correlation between the number of nonsynonymous and synonymous mutations?
Mick
This message has been edited by mick, 12-04-2005 08:16 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by wnope, posted 12-02-2005 5:39 PM wnope has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024