Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Embyo ethics: 400,000 Bush Babies
Parasomnium
Member
Posts: 2224
Joined: 07-15-2003


Message 1 of 2 (395232)
04-15-2007 6:26 PM


In an article in the Boston Globe, Michael J. Sandel discusses the implications of the Bush administration's policy with regard to stem cell research. He states that the stance the president takes in this debate is morally inconsistent.
Some quotes may be in order.
quote:
"Opponents [to stem cell research] argue that the research is unethical, because deriving the stem cells destroys the blastocyst, an unimplanted human embryo at the sixth to eighth day of development. As Bush declared when he vetoed last year's stem cell bill, the federal government should not support 'the taking of innocent human life.'"
quote:
"[...] it is a striking feature of the president's position that, while restricting the funding of embryonic stem cell research, he has made no effort to ban it."
quote:
"But if embryos are human beings, to allow fertility clinics to discard them is to countenance, in effect, the widespread creation and destruction of surplus children."
quote:
"Rather than simply complain that the president's stem cell policy allows religion to trump science, critics should ask why the president does not pursue the full implications of the principle he invokes."
I think the answer to that last question is pretty obvious. Namely, it would mean that Bush would have to commandeer the wombs of 400,000 women, to order doctors to implant the embryos into those wombs, and to have the women carry the babies to full term. On top of that, he'd have to think of a way to explain all that to the tax payer.
Anyway, that's what the president would have to answer if he had thought things through. But I suspect he hasn't. This anti-science president isn't used to thinking things through, or else he would have seen the possible benefits of stem cell research for thousands, if not millions of people - real people that is, not blastocysts with the mere potential to become people - who presently have to battle with diseases that may in the future be cured thanks to this research. Instead, all this president sees is a petri dish with "innocent human life". I wonder how he regards his comb in the morning.
Is president Bush right in opposing stem cell research? Is he consistent? Is it even possible to take his position and still be consistent? I think no, no and no.
Discuss.
("Social Issues and Creation/Evolution" possibly?)

"Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge: it is those who know little, not those who know much, who so positively assert that this or that problem will never be solved by science." - Charles Darwin.
Did you know that most of the time your computer is doing nothing? What if you could make it do something really useful? Like helping scientists understand diseases? Your computer could even be instrumental in finding a cure for HIV/AIDS. Wouldn't that be something? If you agree, then join World Community Grid now and download a simple, free tool that lets you and your computer do your share in helping humanity. After all, you are part of it, so why not take part in it?

Adminnemooseus
Administrator
Posts: 3974
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 2 of 2 (395248)
04-15-2007 7:38 PM


Thread copied to the Embyo ethics: 400,000 Bush Babies thread in the Coffee House forum, this copy of the thread has been closed.

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024