Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,407 Year: 3,664/9,624 Month: 535/974 Week: 148/276 Day: 22/23 Hour: 2/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Possibly the next Paradigm Shift in Evolutionary Theory
wnope
Inactive Member


Message 1 of 5 (264218)
11-29-2005 5:25 PM


Kuhn defines scientific theories as over time experiencing extreme shifts as knowledge about the universe increases.
We may be witnessing on in Evolutionary Theory if the studies are confirmed.
A new experiment performed at the University of Chicago has shown that mutation rates may not actually be constant, but selection pressure varies depending on the ratio of pseudo-genes and functional genes.
University of Chicago study overturns convent | EurekAlert!

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by Adminnemooseus, posted 11-29-2005 6:06 PM wnope has not replied
 Message 3 by Adminnemooseus, posted 12-02-2005 3:04 PM wnope has replied

Adminnemooseus
Administrator
Posts: 3974
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 2 of 5 (264245)
11-29-2005 6:06 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by wnope
11-29-2005 5:25 PM


Needs work
The first 2 little paragraphs are pretty irrelevant.
Could you edit message 1 to expand the content of paragraph 3 some?
Also, also via editing message 1, could you edit the topic title to supply a title that reflects the content of the cited material?
Post a new message to bump the topic, after you make the changes.
Adminnemooseus

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by wnope, posted 11-29-2005 5:25 PM wnope has not replied

Adminnemooseus
Administrator
Posts: 3974
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 3 of 5 (265070)
12-02-2005 3:04 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by wnope
11-29-2005 5:25 PM


Bump - Lots of potential for being a very good topic
Many far weaker "Proposed New Topics" have been given routine promotions, but you've had the misfortune of having yours first responded to by a hard ass admin, notably the one that hates vague, non-descriptive topic titles.
As per message 2, with a better title and a little more content (and you did supply a high quality link), this has the makings of a top quality new topic.
Don't force me to promote a lame version (and try to come up with a better title myself) - Please do a little more to improve your message 1. Then also post a new message, notifying me and/or the other admins that changes have been made.
Adminnemooseus

New Members should start HERE to get an understanding of what makes great posts.
Comments on moderation procedures (or wish to respond to admin messages)? - Go to:
General discussion of moderation procedures
Thread Reopen Requests
Considerations of topic promotions from the "Proposed New Topics" forum
Other useful links:
Forum Guidelines, Style Guides for EvC and Assistance w/ Forum Formatting

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by wnope, posted 11-29-2005 5:25 PM wnope has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by wnope, posted 12-02-2005 3:35 PM Adminnemooseus has replied

wnope
Inactive Member


Message 4 of 5 (265079)
12-02-2005 3:35 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by Adminnemooseus
12-02-2005 3:04 PM


How does this sound?
Title: Mutation Rates Change Natural Selection for Genes
According to a recent University of Chicago study, the amount of mutations accepted by natural selection can differ depending on the ration of neutral (referred to as synonymous mutation [Ks]) and mutations which do effect protein structure, nonsynonymous (Ka).
By comparing the ration of Ka/Ks in any particular gene, a coefficient can be derived that defines the selection pressure on that gene. A low ration signifies high selection, and high ratio signifies weak selection.
Pseudogenes, for instance, have a ration of 1, meaning the mutations are accepted at the same rate of natural selection since the gene is functionless.
quote:
The new data show that if more mutations show up at a gene, that gene tends to accept a higher percentage of those mutations.
"A gene under strong mutational pressure succumbs to that pressure," Lahn said. "For genes that have a high mutation rate, somehow selection appears to become less stringent."
quote:
"Lahn and his associates have found a most striking result, one that is totally unexpected," said geneticist James Crow, professor emeritus of genetics and zoology at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. "If this result is indeed confirmed it would cast doubt on use of this ratio [Ka/Ks] as an indicator of selection."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Adminnemooseus, posted 12-02-2005 3:04 PM Adminnemooseus has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by Adminnemooseus, posted 12-02-2005 5:44 PM wnope has not replied

Adminnemooseus
Administrator
Posts: 3974
Joined: 09-26-2002


Message 5 of 5 (265107)
12-02-2005 5:44 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by wnope
12-02-2005 3:35 PM


Promoted to "Mutation Rates Change Natural Selection for Genes"

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by wnope, posted 12-02-2005 3:35 PM wnope has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024