Why prefer the Biblical creation account over those of other religions?

Let’s say for the sake of argument, Evidence is found that proves Darwin wrong. How do you know that the Biblical account of creation is the true story, and not the accounts told by the Shinto and Hindus (Both of which are living faiths) for example?Citing the Bible is really invalidated by the other sagas (The Bible by itself is no more valid the others). What empirical evidence is there that proves the biblical creation story true and/or the other stories false.P.S. Flood stories are common many cultures. So citing “evidence” of flood doesn’t invalidate other sagas.Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Changed topic title from "A question for creationist" to "Why prefer the Biblical creation account over those of other religions?"

Thread copied to the Why prefer the Biblical creation account over those of other religions? thread in the Theological Creationism and ID forum, this copy of the thread has been closed.