Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,857 Year: 4,114/9,624 Month: 985/974 Week: 312/286 Day: 33/40 Hour: 5/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Proof of the existence of an intelligent Creator and what His purpose of mankind is
andersbranderud
Junior Member (Idle past 5240 days)
Posts: 9
Joined: 09-26-2008


Message 1 of 2 (522749)
09-04-2009 5:18 PM


Scientists have always inferred the origin of the universe by reversing the observed state of the universe. At first, the universe was thought to be static. Thus, science held that the universe simply "always was." Then scientists theorized that gravity must cause the universe to shrink. Thus, science changed its mind, inventing the "Big Bang" Theory. It wasn't until 1998 that astronomers discovered that the universe is expanding at an accelerating rate. Reversing an accelerating expansion to see back in time produces a universe that shrinks at a decelerating rate as one goes back in time to its origin. Follow this process to its ultimate and the rate of shrinkage reduces to converge with timespace where both are zero. That is, both shrinkage and timespace stop at timespace=0. Thus, timespace has a beginning.
From timespace=0, scientists hold that nothing in the universe magically "popped in" with no cause. It is a fundamental law of physics that every physical occurrence in the universe has a cause.
The fundamental laws of physics then require a cause of the universe ex nihilo; i.e., a Prime Cause Singularity that is non-dimensional and independent of timespace. In contrast to endless opinionating of innumerable pseudo-scientific religionists, science recognizes the necessity of a Prime Cause ex nihilo
No eminent scientist represents that our perfectly-orderly universe can be explained ex nihilo without a Prime Cause. Being logically consistent (orderly), the universe must mirror its Prime Cause / Singularity-CreatorWho must be Perfectly Orderly; i.e. Perfect. Therefore, no intelligent person can ignore that our purpose and challenge in life is learning how we, as imperfect humans, may successfully relate to a Perfect Singularity-Creator without our co-mingling, which transcends the timespace of this dimensional physical universe, becoming an imperfection to the Perfect Singularity-Creator
An orderly Creator necessarily had an Intelligent Purpose in creating this universe and us within it and, being Just and Orderly, necessarily placed an explanation, a "Life's Instruction Manual," within the reach of His subjectshumankind.
It defies the orderliness (logic / mathematics) of both the universe and Perfection of its Creator to assert that humanity was (contrary to His Torh′ , see below) without any means of rapproachment until millennia after the first couple in recorded history as well as millennia after Abraham, Moses and the prophets. Therefore, the Creator's "Life's Instruction Manual" has been available to man at least since the beginning of recorded history. The only enduring document of this kind is the Torh′ which, interestingly, translates to "Instruction" (not "law" as popularly alleged). [Source: Netzarim Jews; Ra'anana, Israel]
Religions that contradict" תורה (Torah), therefore, are the antithesis of the Creator.

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by AdminNosy, posted 09-04-2009 8:37 PM andersbranderud has not replied

AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 2 of 2 (522780)
09-04-2009 8:37 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by andersbranderud
09-04-2009 5:18 PM


Some threads to read over
Why don't you read over:
Message 1 (discussing with someone who doesn't know much about the topic) and
Message 1 ( a more detailed discussion of modern physics.
Perhaps you can add your comments to one of those.
You statements about what scientist do and do not think are incorrect. It would be a good idea for you to spend some time reading about the topic before getting into a debate on a thread that you start.
I'll let you have time for those and then if you post here again I will reconsider promoting this topic. This is for your own convenience; you are going to get flooded with corrections to your mistaken understanding.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by andersbranderud, posted 09-04-2009 5:18 PM andersbranderud has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024