Another Chance For Creationists To Recite Falsehoods About Intermediate Forms

There are many intermediate forms in the fossil record. This fact sends biology-deniers into their most ridiculous and hysterical fits of falsehood, because they cannot bear to acknowledge that this fact is a fact.This thread is therefore dedicated to their arguments. If they wish to deny reality, this is the place for them to do so.

I think you could do more to kick this off.You could focus it more clearly on "transitionals" perhaps by getting that in the title.You could give some discussion about punk eck maybe?Just more to set the stage please.

But "where's the meat?" is just the question that I'm asking.I feel like a man in a forest talking to someone who denies the existence of trees. It's hardly up to me to make the argument. This is a thread for reality-deniers to make their arguments. Where's the meat? Where's the meat? Where's the meat? It's an excellent question. Where's the meat?This is a thread for them, not for me. I've told them again and again in other threads about other subjects that their denial of intermediate forms is off-topic. Here is a thread where it is completely on-topic. This is the purpose of this thread. If anyone wants to deny the existence of intermediate forms, this is the place for them to do it.

Thread copied to the Another Chance For Creationists To Recite Falsehoods About Intermediate Forms thread in the Biological Evolution forum, this copy of the thread has been closed.