Peer Review or BUST??

It seems when it comes to Creationists claims they are often refuted with "prove it" or "show some evidence".Well, since NOTHING that Creation scientists come up with will EVER be peer reviewed by the "real" Scientists then all we have is Evolutionists saying "PRATT" 5000 times a day. The only "evidence" Evolutionists will take is from the "real" Scientists. Basically Creation Scientists are censored. They do have their own peer reviewed journals, which can be used for evidence but NOT according to Evolutionists. SO, what to do? Well, since most of us aren't PZ Myers or Kenneth Miller most of us get our info from sources. Yes, sources. BOTH sources are peer reviewed but only ONE source is recognized. No matter what we Creationists say it's always the same ole "you have no evidence, we have ALL the evidence BYE BYE". Well do you all believe every single thing you see on the news? Or just whats reported? Of course not. There ARE other sources. Just because they WON'T peer review Creation Scientists DOESN'T mean we are LYING. Just like most of you AREN'T Scientists we BOTH have to get our info from somehwere. You say "you have Science and we have the bible. We have evidence and you have faith". Really? If Creation Scientists are out there doing research ( and a lot of them are ) and they have journals of peer reviewed articles who are any of you to say "it doesn't count". Can YOU prove it doesn't count? Are you guys out there researching and testing like them? NO. And then there's the "you get all your stuff form Creationist lying websites". Well YOU get all of YOUR information from Evolutionist websites, of course unless you are a Scientist. If you Evolutionists will NEVER take our evidence serious what's the use?

My impression is that your message 1 is a rant containing a lot of redundant statements. Would you please edit message 1 to clarify your position and/or eliminate the redundant statements? Doing such will (hopefully) make for a better running topic.A block of text that size should also be somehow broken up into at least 2or 3 paragraphs. Also, please add blank lines between paragraphs - It makes things much more readable.Please post a "edits done" type reply to this message, after you complete your changes. That way, the admins will know changes have been made.Questions? Feel free to "personal message" me, or any of the other admins.Adminnemooseus Added by edit - Note: Copy of original message 1 is "hidden" in this message.Edited by Adminnemooseus, : See above.

---

Please be familiar with the various topics and other links in the "Essential Links", found in the top of the page menu. Amongst other things, this is where to find where to report various forum problems.

Thanks, after writing it I felt the same way, lol...sorry. I'll edit it down.

It seems when it comes to Creationists claims they are often refuted with "prove it" or "show some evidence". Since most if not all of what Creation scientists come up with will not be peer reviewed by the "real" Scientists then all we have is Evolutionists saying "PRATT" to new posts or comments. The only "evidence" Evolutionists will take is from the "real" Scientists. Basically Creation Scientists are censored. They do have their own peer reviewed journals, which can be used for evidence but not so with Evolutionists.So, what to do? Well, since most of us aren't PZ Myers or Kenneth Miller we get our information from sources. Both sources are peer reviewed but only one source is recognized. Does everyone believe every single thing they see on the news? Or just what's reported? Sometimes it's whats not being reported. There are other sources. Just because they refuse (yes refuse)to peer review Creation Scientists it does not mean we are lying or trying to deceive. We just happen to believe the evidence that is presented to us like Evolutionists do when it's presented to them.Also, most evolutionists like to say they have Science and evidence to back up their claims and we have the Bible or silly Creationist websites. If Creation Scientists are out there doing research ( and a lot of them are ) and they have journals of peer reviewed articles why can we not reference them? Why doesn't it "count"? Most of you are not out there researching and testing like they are. Yes, we get a lot of info from Creationists websites which are very informative IMO and there is a checks and balances system they go by. Education is sort of one sided since TOE is the only thing taught in Schools. So if you have a Phd for instance and a Christian doesn't the evidence is still the evidence no matter your education.If the Evolutionists will never take our evidence serious what's the use? Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.Edited by Chuck77, : No reason given.

The promoted topic.This version now closed.Adminnemooseus