Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 67 (9028 total)
37 online now:
jar, PaulK (2 members, 35 visitors)
Newest Member: JustTheFacts
Post Volume: Total: 884,103 Year: 1,749/14,102 Month: 117/624 Week: 1/95 Day: 1/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is my basis sound?
Meaker
Junior Member (Idle past 3246 days)
Posts: 4
From: Edinburgh
Joined: 02-20-2012


Message 1 of 2 (653339)
02-20-2012 8:09 AM


I am currently in a debate with a creationist friend of mine.

I am a graduated electronic engineer, he studied geology.

The debate has mostly settled on 3 issues. He claims:

Evolution is unproven.
Radio dating is unreliable. The earth is 10s of thousands not thousands of years old.
The bible is literal truth.

I struggle with radio dating because it's not my field but basically my arguments (from the research I have managed to do) so far are:

Radio dating provides strong correlated results that do not appear random (therefore its unlikely that parent atoms also had a random amount of daughter atoms to begin with) That any uniform pairings that were introduced during the creation of the atoms would show up in plots and could be accounted for.

He argues to this that the different forms don't agree, I am I right in thinking that these differences are small and not enough to support a young earth?

Also I read that zircon crystals using uranium-lead dating can be assumed to be uncontaminated at their start, is this correct?

I am much more comfortable in the field of astronomy and I have pointed out that other forms of dating such as the age of our sun, based on entirely different methods agree and can act as a benchmark.

------------------------

For evolution he says he accepts micro-evolution but not macro evolution.

I have not had the chance to go after this much yet and any input on this would be appreciated.

------------------------

Also I have said on the topic of the flood that there is no evidence for such a wide scale flood capable of covering mount Everest (this would have to be supernatural as the earth does not contain that much water) and that animals like the dodo, who could not swim or fly on islands should have gone extinct since it could not make it to an ark.

-------------------------

This is my first extended debate so any help would be appreciated.


Admin
Director
Posts: 12714
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002


Message 2 of 2 (653341)
02-20-2012 8:11 AM


Thread Copied to Coffee House Forum
Thread copied to the Is my basis sound? thread in the Coffee House forum, this copy of the thread has been closed.

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2021