Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9176 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: sirs
Post Volume: Total: 917,657 Year: 4,914/9,624 Month: 262/427 Week: 8/64 Day: 4/2 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   inverse square a function of logarithmic perception -i/x^2
Larry Hanawalt
Junior Member (Idle past 3852 days)
Posts: 3
Joined: 11-22-2013


Message 1 of 5 (711996)
11-25-2013 12:10 PM


I once had an experience of light as constituted by equal and opposite exponentials. The second derivative of the complex exponential function (-e^(ix)) and the second derivative of the complex logarithmic function (-i/z^2) seem to provide an analogy.
i*ln''(z) = -i/z^2 (as the location of the observer, the model-maker, the measurer) provides the inverse square relationship that we attribute to gravity--"gravity" a function of perception, not force? (The Weber-Fechner Law and other evidence support the idea that all perception might be logarithmic.)
It's crazy, I know--but it would eliminate the need for dark energy and dark matter. And a complex exponential "space" viewed from a complex logarithmic perspective ("time") would give us a flat, steady-state rather than an exponentially expanding universe.
The flat, steady-state aspect is indicated mathematically by the fact that the real number line is the real part of minus i/z^2...the real number line representing a mean between exponential and logarithmic curves.http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=i+ln%27%27%28z%29
(It would also be an anti-entropic universe. All a very hard sell. But since the current macro-model doesn't work, there may be some tolerance for crazy. At this point I just want to see if the model works mathematically.)

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by AdminNosy, posted 11-25-2013 3:29 PM Larry Hanawalt has not replied
 Message 3 by Admin, posted 11-25-2013 5:16 PM Larry Hanawalt has replied

  
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 2 of 5 (712006)
11-25-2013 3:29 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Larry Hanawalt
11-25-2013 12:10 PM


Unqualified
I am certainly not qualified to judge this to decide to promote it or not. I'll have to leave it to other admins.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Larry Hanawalt, posted 11-25-2013 12:10 PM Larry Hanawalt has not replied

  
Admin
Director
Posts: 13082
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.1


Message 3 of 5 (712015)
11-25-2013 5:16 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Larry Hanawalt
11-25-2013 12:10 PM


Larry Hanawalt writes:
I once had an experience of light as constituted by equal and opposite exponentials.
Really? Did you get a sunburn?
The second derivative of the complex exponential function (-e^(ix)) and the second derivative of the complex logarithmic function (-i/z^2) seem to provide an analogy.
The 2nd derivative of -eix is eix, while that of -i/z2 is 0. How is that an analogy to anything about light?
You seem to be speaking in gobbledygook and I suspect you're a quack. Can you explain this in terms laypeople can understand, and also how it relates to the creation/evolution debate? I also see you've posted the identical message to ScienceForums.net. If you're not really a quack then that might be a better venue for what you want to discuss.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Larry Hanawalt, posted 11-25-2013 12:10 PM Larry Hanawalt has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by Larry Hanawalt, posted 11-26-2013 4:42 PM Admin has replied

  
Larry Hanawalt
Junior Member (Idle past 3852 days)
Posts: 3
Joined: 11-22-2013


Message 4 of 5 (712068)
11-26-2013 4:42 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by Admin
11-25-2013 5:16 PM


matter, antimatter and e^ix + 1 = 0
Percy, thanks. I suppose it's possible that I am a crank. (I love the wikipedia crank page.) I'll start in a different place and stop quickly. If you suggest that I cease and desist on this Forum, I will.
Euler's e^iz + 1 = 0 indicates a rate of change that is equal and opposite in sign to the instantaneous rate of change. The "deceleration" is a mirror image--a tangent to the unit circle that is pointed in the opposite direction from the function's rate of change.
It seems to me that the matter/antimatter mirror image might be considered to have this e^ix + 1 = 0 mathematical relationship.
(Suppose that the matter/antimatter model involves representing a non-dual phenomenon as a duality.)
I'll stop there for a comment. Be gentle.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Admin, posted 11-25-2013 5:16 PM Admin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by Admin, posted 11-26-2013 10:04 PM Larry Hanawalt has not replied

  
Admin
Director
Posts: 13082
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.1


Message 5 of 5 (712092)
11-26-2013 10:04 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by Larry Hanawalt
11-26-2013 4:42 PM


Re: matter, antimatter and e^ix + 1 = 0
Sorry, Larry, makes no sense to me, so little I can't even give you feedback about how to help me. It sounds like nonsense to me, and I'm usually a pretty good judge. Plus it doesn't seem related to the creation/evolution debate.
Feel free to try to explain it in terms I might understand, but be careful not to waste your time. I'm not going to promote a topic I don't understand, no matter how sincere and effortful you are.
In the meantime, please participate as much as you like in any of the existing discussion threads.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by Larry Hanawalt, posted 11-26-2013 4:42 PM Larry Hanawalt has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024