whatevers suspension in dates and dating

whatever (in the wrong forum)AdminNosy/NosyNed,
You asked me a question and I answered you, I don't know what your problem is, why ask a question you want an answer to, when you know its off topic, we all know your AdminNosy, Nosyned, etc...You were off topic being an administrator, to request an answer off topic, etc...P.S. Its an abuse of powers, when an administrator asks a question, requesting an answer from a member, so to then ban someone for answering his requested question, etc...

here is the last post of whatevers

quote:

---

Ned, I thought you were going to look for evidences for sea level lowerings via glaciation, helping the person you were responding too, etc...?, I didn't see any evidence, by anyone to support evidence from those two posts that the glaciers lowered the oceans, perhaps your in agreement then that there is no evidence the glaciers had any effect on the lowering of the oceans, only in the raising in their melting, etc...
P.S. The reason I was interested cause via the flood model, glaciation happened suddenly, the pleistocene extinction fossil evidences, etc... so was kind of interested in evidence to the contrary, though pleased to see their will be no evidence forthcoming, etc...

​

I mean those Pacific Seamounts discovered by Princeton University geologist H.H. Hess in the 1940's, mentioned by Rachael Carson in her book the Sea Around us written in 1950's, that they are over 1/2 mile under the wave base, supporting evidence in the natural that the oceans rose upward's, or the oceans floor settled, supporting evidences confirming psalm 104:6-10, that the waters rushed off the face of the earth to the place prepared by God for them (the oceans), etc...

---

In response to :

In reviewing this I have decided to re instate whatever's posting.Part of my reaction was to this absolutely stupid comment of his: So you get priviledges back for a bit whatever. However, consider each post carefully. It must be on topic. It must not have made up crap as an answer. It must deal with what is actually at issue.You may start out by explaining, in your own, words what the issue behind the thread regarding correlation is. If you fail to do that you will not keep your posting authorizations.

Suspension seems rather draconian. Whatever is one of a number of creationists here who have great difficulty in comprehending what is relevant to a topic and what is not. In other cases I have seen the wanderer chided to stay on topic; I see no reason to take more severe action.

Mostly chiding is enough. whatever however seems to need more. Some topics are very well defined and focussed. The correlations one is of that kind and he will be required to stick to it.whatever doesn't bring any value in his postings anyway.

The admin have treated whatever with kid gloves long enough; I support your actions, Ned.

I haven't read a single one of his posts for days, since too much of them are non-sensical. His writing style sucks and he has no idea on how to keep a coherent thought going. I absolutely don't see what he could possibly contribute to our debate.

---

The Laminator

​