The Nature of Scientific Inquiry; Is Evolution Science?

The thread containing this post from Faith was closed, so...I think it should go in "Is it Science?"Faith writes:

quote:

---

You guys are a riot. What a joke. By your standards nothing whatever is proof EXCEPT your own sometimes somewhat scientific guesses extrapolated from the present to the distant past which can't be tested, proved, replicated or falsified.

---

Faith, this is a very false statement.I am going to start a new thread regarding the nature of scientific inquiry in order to help you understand that the ToE is, indeed, quite falsifiable, it's observations can be replicated, and is testable, contrary to your bald, baseless assertions that it cannot and is not.If you decide to not join me at this thread, I'd like you to write, for the entire board to see, that you believe that the hundreds of thousands of scientists who have studied Evolution over the last 150 years are a bunch of moronic dunderheads that have been getting everything completely wrong in all of their millions of manhours of work over the decades.You do realize that you are doing this when you make such statements, don't you?You do understand how wildly arrogant you sound when you do so, don't you?

Thread copied to the The Nature of Scientific Inquiry; Is Evolution Science? thread in the Is It Science? forum, this copy of the thread has been closed.