We Never Came From Monkeys

EARLY MAN After more than a century spent trying to figure out people, the experts still declare that all the races of man belong to only one species. Regarding the dates concerning mankind, evolutionists speculate that humans have lived here for one to three million yearsand then, suddenly, stopped evolving 100,000 years ago.Yet actual historical dates go back less than 5,000 years. Using historical, archaeological, and astronomical data, dates for early mankind extend to about 2250 B.C.But using results of the notoriously inaccurate carbon 14 dating system, the earliest dates for mankind extend back about 15,000 years.Let us now consider some actual evidence of early people on our planet.We will find they were real human beings. And where they were located disproves evolutionary theories.p. 27.The Guadeloupe woman. In 1812, on the Caribbean island of Guadeloupe, a fully human skeleton was found, lacking only the head and feet. It was found inside extremely hard, very old limestone, which was part of a formation over a mile in length.In accordance with their theory, evolutionists date that rock at 25 million years! You will not find the Guadeloupe woman mentioned in the textbooks, since this find would disprove evolutionary strata dating.p. 29.The Caveras skull. In 1876, 130 feet below ground, a skull was found in the "2 million-year-old" Pliocene strata. It was certified as completely mineralized, yet totally human. Dozens of stone mortars, bowls, and other man-made artifacts were found near this skull.p. 29.The Castinedolo skull. A group of perfectly human ancient skulls were found in Castinedolo, Italy, and, with the Caveras Skull, are considered among the most ancient skulls. Yet they are perfectly human.p. 29.The Moab Skeletons. Two skeletons were found in Cretaceous rock (supposedly dated at 100 million years) in Moab, Utah, about 15 feet below the surface.Both skeletons were definitely human and ancient. They had been undisturbed till they were found. When tested for age, they were only a few thousand years old.pp. 29-30.For more information on the facts please visit http://forums.onlytherightanswers.com/viewtopic.php?t=12This message has been edited by TheMookis, 07-02-2005 07:39 PMThis message has been edited by TheMookis, 07-02-2005 07:39 PMThis message has been edited by TheMookis, 07-02-2005 07:47 PM

---

For more information on this topic please visit http://forums.onlytherightanswers.com

Hi MookisUnattributed cut and paste jobs are NOT the way to start out here.Your entire post was lifted from : 2021 Please read our Forum Guidelines about cutting and pasting and about using links only as supporting evidence.This topic will not be advanced as is.May I suggest that you search our rather large forum and find a topic already in progress to whet your teeth on.

---

AdminAsgara Queen of the Universe

http://asgarasworld.bravepages.com http://perditionsgate.bravepages.com

I think you might have a possible opening post to some discussion. In fact one problem is that you have several different things to discuss here. One problem we encounter with threads is keeping them on topic.To keep a thread on topic it is best to start with a tightly focussed opening post.Your first paragraph is about species of humans and contains an error of fact.You third paragraph discusses C14 dating as "notoriously inaccurate". That you could discuss in existing threads in dates and dating. If that comment is left in the opening post people will have a tough time resisting the temptation to call you on it.Each of the human finds you mention would probably be best discussed in a separate thread. Can you pick just one that you want to discuss first.The rules here suggest that you supply the arguement - in your own words - here. You may use websites as references supporting your argument.This OP (opening post), as it stands, can not be promoted for discussion.