Since Faith claims that her arguments on this point have not been fairly addressed I think we need a topic so that she can calmly make her point in a clear and rational fashion.
The original assertion is
here
The claim is about the discovery of the Isaiah scroll:
The Isaiah scroll among the Dead Sea scrolls confirms the fact that there haven't been all the changes in the text so often claimed
So which proposed changes does it ACTUALLY rule out ? As was pointed out in the following discussion it isn't even relevant to the allegations of major additions to Isaiah itself. So what are these "charges" that it does refute and who made them ?
Edited by AdminJar to fix link.
This message has been edited by AdminJar, 04-10-2005 03:12 PM
This message has been edited by PaulK, 04-10-2005 05:14 PM