This is probably not going to be much of a discusion topic; but is a question that people who know about geology/flood debates could probably answer me.
Annyway, I ve noticed that most pages that defend a global flood also defend an old earth. And the OEC usually believe in a local flood. So, the question is: What part of flood geology becomes hard to explain if one acepts an old earth?
I ask mainly because a friend of mine is a Jehova witness, and he believes in an old earth and a local flood. Is there any way I can prove him that those views are contradictory?
Thanks
Edited by Garabato, : No reason given.