|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,824 Year: 4,081/9,624 Month: 952/974 Week: 279/286 Day: 0/40 Hour: 0/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
Member (Idle past 5861 days) Posts: 772 From: Bartlett, IL, USA Joined: |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Movie "The Beast" on the way | |||||||||||||||||||||||
SuperNintendo Chalmers Member (Idle past 5861 days) Posts: 772 From: Bartlett, IL, USA Joined: |
Beast Digital Marketing | Grow Your Online Business Like A Boss
This movie is set to be release on 6-6-06 (yes I find that quite funny sadly!). It supposedly is a DaVinci Code style movie about a girl that finds out Jesus never existed; that it was all made up by the church. This is of course based upon the fact that no evidence of Jesus's existence exists outside the bible. The movie supposedly will be based on facts and will discuss this lack of evidence. I can't wait until the fundies get ahold of this one.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
arachnophilia Member (Idle past 1371 days) Posts: 9069 From: god's waiting room Joined: |
(sigh)
trying to capitalize of people's infatuation with the davinci code, which i refuse to read. it is sort of a popular theory, really. there was even a nod to it in "the last tempation of christ." jesus runs into paul, who is busy preaching the story of jesus's life and death, nevermind that he didn't die. i forget what paul said exactly, but it was sort of amusing. This message has been edited by arachnophilia, 01-03-2006 09:12 PM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
SuperNintendo Chalmers Member (Idle past 5861 days) Posts: 772 From: Bartlett, IL, USA Joined: |
I haven't read the davinci code either..... I know that it is fiction, albeit supposedly interlaced with some interesting research (not sure if that is true or not).
This movie interestes me because the lack of evidence for a historical jesus has always been a subject of interest to me: Some more info about the movie:
FACTS
The Beast is currently in pre-production. The cast and crew are legally sworn to secrecy. The theory that Jesus Christ never existed, while largely unknown to most lay Christians, is gaining credibility among scholars. Historians do not consider the Gospels to be historically accurate accounts. The authors of the Gospels, writing 40 to 90 years after the supposed life of Christ, never intended for their works to be read as biographies. There are no credible non-Christian references to Christ during the period in which he is said to have lived.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Ben! Member (Idle past 1426 days) Posts: 1161 From: Hayward, CA Joined: |
Here's an off-topic comment that might move us towards a discussion which doesn't belong in the coffee house. But.. sometimes, that's the way it goes.
The theory that Jesus Christ never existed, while largely unknown to most lay Christians, is gaining credibility among scholars. ... There are no credible non-Christian references to Christ during the period in which he is said to have lived. See, that's part of the problem in empiricism: the method of investigation is so seductive, sometimes you get drawn into using your eyes and ears when really, it's a matter of the heart.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Son Goku Inactive Member |
This might sound ridiculous, but funnily enough there was actual gigantic astrological significance in the sky around the time he was supposedly born.
And it actually fits in with New Testament accounts and is consistent with Magi interpretations of the sky at the time. Any astrological "wise men" might actually have had good reason to go to Israel around this time. This has lead to the idea that perhaps the general "prophetic nature" of the sky at the time lead to a myth/legend of a messiah.The whole thing is called "The events of 2/3 B.C." informally by astronomical historians.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
riVeRraT Member (Idle past 443 days) Posts: 5788 From: NY USA Joined: |
It supposedly is a DaVinci Code style movie about a girl that finds out Jesus never existed; Who is afraid of the dark when they have the light? There is no evidence of some of your relatives, but you exist. Its all about gradually changing the world, and we let it happen. That is why movies like this can exist, and why they would even be made. Just look at what is on TV now, compared to 35 years ago.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
SuperNintendo Chalmers Member (Idle past 5861 days) Posts: 772 From: Bartlett, IL, USA Joined: |
Who is afraid of the dark when they have the light? There is no evidence of some of your relatives, but you exist. Complete and total strawman. My relatives are not supposedly famous... There is plenty of evidence for other famous people from that time (Cicero, J Caesar, A Caesar, Marcus Brutus, Scipio, etC)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
arachnophilia Member (Idle past 1371 days) Posts: 9069 From: god's waiting room Joined: |
I haven't read the davinci code either..... I know that it is fiction, albeit supposedly interlaced with some interesting research (not sure if that is true or not). well, a lot of it's pretty solid academic hypothesis. the bits about the merovingians claiming descent from christ, through the child of mary of magdala is, iirc, correct. i'm fairly certain they did make such a claim. the bits about the priori of sion though are apparently laughable in france. it was a hoax from the 1970's that's well known now.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1471 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
See, that's part of the problem in empiricism: the method of investigation is so seductive, sometimes you get drawn into using your eyes and ears when really, it's a matter of the heart. I could be tempted to agree with this kind of statement, if it weren't in the context of questioning the very existence of Jesus Christ. Extra-biblical proofs are not only not needed, but superfluous because it IS a matter of the heart, or spirit, yes, and "the heart has its reasons which reason knows not of." But the problem is that unbelievers read this to mean that it's all just a feeling, a subjective experience with no corresponding objective reality involved, which is not at all what a Christian means by it. Pascal who wrote "the heart has its reasons..." certainly did not mean that. The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob was a vivid objectivity to him. This message has been edited by Faith, 01-04-2006 01:13 AM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Ben! Member (Idle past 1426 days) Posts: 1161 From: Hayward, CA Joined: |
the problem is that unbelievers read this to mean that it's all just a feeling, a subjective experience with no corresponding objective reality involved, which is not at all what a Christian means by it. I agree that it seems a large majority of Christians think that way. I try not to make that mistake.
Pascal who wrote "the heart has its reasons..." certainly did not mean that. The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob was a vivid objectivity to him. I'm interested to pick your brain about this (not just the quote above per say, but the topic in general). If I open a thread about "The role of 'truth' / reality in faith & belief", would you be so kind as to oblige me there? I'd take you to nwr's new thread, but I fully understand that he wants to focus on a different topic. Ben
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
cavediver Member (Idle past 3670 days) Posts: 4129 From: UK Joined: |
(sigh) trying to capitalize of people's infatuation with the davinci code, which i refuse to read. I assume you've read Foucault's Pendulum? I also assume that the writers of the DVC haven't I don't suppose you've come across any interview with Umberto Eco where he comments on the DVC? That would be a good read...
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
arachnophilia Member (Idle past 1371 days) Posts: 9069 From: god's waiting room Joined: |
I assume you've read Foucault's Pendulum? I also assume that the writers of the DVC haven't no, i have not.
I don't suppose you've come across any interview with Umberto Eco where he comments on the DVC? That would be a good read... that sounds like it would be amusing.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
cavediver Member (Idle past 3670 days) Posts: 4129 From: UK Joined: |
no, i have not. Then do so Arach!!! I can give no greater recommendation. Not only is it an awesome read but my vocabulary doubled It essentially revolves around the nonsense of all the Templar myths, but brings in everthing from cabala to John Dee to programming and mathematics, and pokes a very big stick at it all. But then, things aren't always as you would expect... I have a feeling you would appreciate it. This message has been edited by cavediver, 01-04-2006 04:28 AM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
arachnophilia Member (Idle past 1371 days) Posts: 9069 From: god's waiting room Joined: |
yeah, i might. i'll give it a look.
(i hear anthony burgess said it needed an index. but i find that anthony burgess was usually wrong about his own writings, so what does he know about anyone elses?)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
riVeRraT Member (Idle past 443 days) Posts: 5788 From: NY USA Joined: |
There is plenty of evidence for other famous people from that time (Cicero, J Caesar, A Caesar, Marcus Brutus, Scipio, etC) If there was one book written about caesar, then there is a whole room full of books written about Jesus, yet people take Caeser as fact, and Jesus as a myth. Why would you expect to find evidence from a person who had nothing? He walked the earth and stayed in peoples houses, and left no trail, thats what all the books tell us. There was a wooden cross, and that is it. The books tell us there should be no evidence, except his word, which is exactly what we find. Droves a people who converted there religion during a time that was risky to do so, and continues to this day. Matthew 26
quote: And that is exactly what happened. Pretty good 2000 year old prediction. I mean what do you expect to find? The Holy Grail? The ark of the convenant? Its not like there was money with Jesus's face on it or something. The evidence is in his words.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024