Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,824 Year: 4,081/9,624 Month: 952/974 Week: 279/286 Day: 0/40 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Movie "The Beast" on the way
SuperNintendo Chalmers
Member (Idle past 5861 days)
Posts: 772
From: Bartlett, IL, USA
Joined: 12-27-2005


Message 1 of 42 (275250)
01-03-2006 3:18 AM


Beast Digital Marketing | Grow Your Online Business Like A Boss
This movie is set to be release on 6-6-06 (yes I find that quite funny sadly!).
It supposedly is a DaVinci Code style movie about a girl that finds out Jesus never existed; that it was all made up by the church. This is of course based upon the fact that no evidence of Jesus's existence exists outside the bible.
The movie supposedly will be based on facts and will discuss this lack of evidence.
I can't wait until the fundies get ahold of this one.

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by arachnophilia, posted 01-03-2006 9:12 PM SuperNintendo Chalmers has replied
 Message 6 by riVeRraT, posted 01-04-2006 12:34 AM SuperNintendo Chalmers has replied
 Message 19 by docpotato, posted 01-04-2006 6:26 PM SuperNintendo Chalmers has replied

  
arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1371 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 2 of 42 (275508)
01-03-2006 9:12 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by SuperNintendo Chalmers
01-03-2006 3:18 AM


(sigh)
trying to capitalize of people's infatuation with the davinci code, which i refuse to read.
it is sort of a popular theory, really. there was even a nod to it in "the last tempation of christ." jesus runs into paul, who is busy preaching the story of jesus's life and death, nevermind that he didn't die. i forget what paul said exactly, but it was sort of amusing.
This message has been edited by arachnophilia, 01-03-2006 09:12 PM

אָרַח

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by SuperNintendo Chalmers, posted 01-03-2006 3:18 AM SuperNintendo Chalmers has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by SuperNintendo Chalmers, posted 01-03-2006 9:16 PM arachnophilia has replied
 Message 11 by cavediver, posted 01-04-2006 4:09 AM arachnophilia has replied

  
SuperNintendo Chalmers
Member (Idle past 5861 days)
Posts: 772
From: Bartlett, IL, USA
Joined: 12-27-2005


Message 3 of 42 (275510)
01-03-2006 9:16 PM
Reply to: Message 2 by arachnophilia
01-03-2006 9:12 PM


davinci code?
I haven't read the davinci code either..... I know that it is fiction, albeit supposedly interlaced with some interesting research (not sure if that is true or not).
This movie interestes me because the lack of evidence for a historical jesus has always been a subject of interest to me:
Some more info about the movie:
FACTS
The Beast is currently in pre-production.
The cast and crew are legally sworn to secrecy.
The theory that Jesus Christ never existed, while largely unknown to most lay Christians, is gaining credibility among scholars. Historians do not consider the Gospels to be historically accurate accounts. The authors of the Gospels, writing 40 to 90 years after the supposed life of Christ, never intended for their works to be read as biographies. There are no credible non-Christian references to Christ during the period in which he is said to have lived.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by arachnophilia, posted 01-03-2006 9:12 PM arachnophilia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by Ben!, posted 01-03-2006 9:23 PM SuperNintendo Chalmers has not replied
 Message 8 by arachnophilia, posted 01-04-2006 1:07 AM SuperNintendo Chalmers has not replied

  
Ben!
Member (Idle past 1426 days)
Posts: 1161
From: Hayward, CA
Joined: 10-14-2004


Message 4 of 42 (275512)
01-03-2006 9:23 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by SuperNintendo Chalmers
01-03-2006 9:16 PM


Re: davinci code?
Here's an off-topic comment that might move us towards a discussion which doesn't belong in the coffee house. But.. sometimes, that's the way it goes.
The theory that Jesus Christ never existed, while largely unknown to most lay Christians, is gaining credibility among scholars. ... There are no credible non-Christian references to Christ during the period in which he is said to have lived.
See, that's part of the problem in empiricism: the method of investigation is so seductive, sometimes you get drawn into using your eyes and ears when really, it's a matter of the heart.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by SuperNintendo Chalmers, posted 01-03-2006 9:16 PM SuperNintendo Chalmers has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by Faith, posted 01-04-2006 1:09 AM Ben! has replied

  
Son Goku
Inactive Member


Message 5 of 42 (275515)
01-03-2006 9:36 PM


This might sound ridiculous, but funnily enough there was actual gigantic astrological significance in the sky around the time he was supposedly born.
And it actually fits in with New Testament accounts and is consistent with Magi interpretations of the sky at the time.
Any astrological "wise men" might actually have had good reason to go to Israel around this time.
This has lead to the idea that perhaps the general "prophetic nature" of the sky at the time lead to a myth/legend of a messiah.
The whole thing is called "The events of 2/3 B.C." informally by astronomical historians.

Replies to this message:
 Message 33 by RAZD, posted 01-05-2006 9:39 PM Son Goku has not replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 443 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 6 of 42 (275575)
01-04-2006 12:34 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by SuperNintendo Chalmers
01-03-2006 3:18 AM


The subtlety of the gradual
It supposedly is a DaVinci Code style movie about a girl that finds out Jesus never existed;
Who is afraid of the dark when they have the light?
There is no evidence of some of your relatives, but you exist.
Its all about gradually changing the world, and we let it happen. That is why movies like this can exist, and why they would even be made.
Just look at what is on TV now, compared to 35 years ago.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by SuperNintendo Chalmers, posted 01-03-2006 3:18 AM SuperNintendo Chalmers has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by SuperNintendo Chalmers, posted 01-04-2006 12:58 AM riVeRraT has replied

  
SuperNintendo Chalmers
Member (Idle past 5861 days)
Posts: 772
From: Bartlett, IL, USA
Joined: 12-27-2005


Message 7 of 42 (275587)
01-04-2006 12:58 AM
Reply to: Message 6 by riVeRraT
01-04-2006 12:34 AM


Re: The subtlety of the gradual
Who is afraid of the dark when they have the light?
There is no evidence of some of your relatives, but you exist.
Complete and total strawman.
My relatives are not supposedly famous...
There is plenty of evidence for other famous people from that time (Cicero, J Caesar, A Caesar, Marcus Brutus, Scipio, etC)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by riVeRraT, posted 01-04-2006 12:34 AM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 15 by riVeRraT, posted 01-04-2006 6:42 AM SuperNintendo Chalmers has not replied

  
arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1371 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 8 of 42 (275591)
01-04-2006 1:07 AM
Reply to: Message 3 by SuperNintendo Chalmers
01-03-2006 9:16 PM


Re: davinci code?
I haven't read the davinci code either..... I know that it is fiction, albeit supposedly interlaced with some interesting research (not sure if that is true or not).
well, a lot of it's pretty solid academic hypothesis. the bits about the merovingians claiming descent from christ, through the child of mary of magdala is, iirc, correct. i'm fairly certain they did make such a claim. the bits about the priori of sion though are apparently laughable in france. it was a hoax from the 1970's that's well known now.

אָרַח

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by SuperNintendo Chalmers, posted 01-03-2006 9:16 PM SuperNintendo Chalmers has not replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1471 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 9 of 42 (275592)
01-04-2006 1:09 AM
Reply to: Message 4 by Ben!
01-03-2006 9:23 PM


empiricism/proof/reason/heart/spirit
See, that's part of the problem in empiricism: the method of investigation is so seductive, sometimes you get drawn into using your eyes and ears when really, it's a matter of the heart.
I could be tempted to agree with this kind of statement, if it weren't in the context of questioning the very existence of Jesus Christ. Extra-biblical proofs are not only not needed, but superfluous because it IS a matter of the heart, or spirit, yes, and "the heart has its reasons which reason knows not of." But the problem is that unbelievers read this to mean that it's all just a feeling, a subjective experience with no corresponding objective reality involved, which is not at all what a Christian means by it. Pascal who wrote "the heart has its reasons..." certainly did not mean that. The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob was a vivid objectivity to him.
This message has been edited by Faith, 01-04-2006 01:13 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by Ben!, posted 01-03-2006 9:23 PM Ben! has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by Ben!, posted 01-04-2006 1:28 AM Faith has replied

  
Ben!
Member (Idle past 1426 days)
Posts: 1161
From: Hayward, CA
Joined: 10-14-2004


Message 10 of 42 (275599)
01-04-2006 1:28 AM
Reply to: Message 9 by Faith
01-04-2006 1:09 AM


Re: empiricism/proof/reason/heart/spirit
the problem is that unbelievers read this to mean that it's all just a feeling, a subjective experience with no corresponding objective reality involved, which is not at all what a Christian means by it.
I agree that it seems a large majority of Christians think that way. I try not to make that mistake.
Pascal who wrote "the heart has its reasons..." certainly did not mean that. The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob was a vivid objectivity to him.
I'm interested to pick your brain about this (not just the quote above per say, but the topic in general). If I open a thread about "The role of 'truth' / reality in faith & belief", would you be so kind as to oblige me there? I'd take you to nwr's new thread, but I fully understand that he wants to focus on a different topic.
Ben

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by Faith, posted 01-04-2006 1:09 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by Faith, posted 01-04-2006 11:31 AM Ben! has not replied

  
cavediver
Member (Idle past 3670 days)
Posts: 4129
From: UK
Joined: 06-16-2005


Message 11 of 42 (275616)
01-04-2006 4:09 AM
Reply to: Message 2 by arachnophilia
01-03-2006 9:12 PM


(sigh)
trying to capitalize of people's infatuation with the davinci code, which i refuse to read.
I assume you've read Foucault's Pendulum? I also assume that the writers of the DVC haven't
I don't suppose you've come across any interview with Umberto Eco where he comments on the DVC? That would be a good read...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by arachnophilia, posted 01-03-2006 9:12 PM arachnophilia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by arachnophilia, posted 01-04-2006 4:19 AM cavediver has replied

  
arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1371 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 12 of 42 (275618)
01-04-2006 4:19 AM
Reply to: Message 11 by cavediver
01-04-2006 4:09 AM


I assume you've read Foucault's Pendulum? I also assume that the writers of the DVC haven't
no, i have not.
I don't suppose you've come across any interview with Umberto Eco where he comments on the DVC? That would be a good read...
that sounds like it would be amusing.

אָרַח

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by cavediver, posted 01-04-2006 4:09 AM cavediver has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 13 by cavediver, posted 01-04-2006 4:27 AM arachnophilia has replied

  
cavediver
Member (Idle past 3670 days)
Posts: 4129
From: UK
Joined: 06-16-2005


Message 13 of 42 (275620)
01-04-2006 4:27 AM
Reply to: Message 12 by arachnophilia
01-04-2006 4:19 AM


no, i have not.
Then do so Arach!!! I can give no greater recommendation.
Not only is it an awesome read but my vocabulary doubled It essentially revolves around the nonsense of all the Templar myths, but brings in everthing from cabala to John Dee to programming and mathematics, and pokes a very big stick at it all. But then, things aren't always as you would expect... I have a feeling you would appreciate it.
This message has been edited by cavediver, 01-04-2006 04:28 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by arachnophilia, posted 01-04-2006 4:19 AM arachnophilia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by arachnophilia, posted 01-04-2006 4:39 AM cavediver has not replied

  
arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1371 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 14 of 42 (275623)
01-04-2006 4:39 AM
Reply to: Message 13 by cavediver
01-04-2006 4:27 AM


yeah, i might. i'll give it a look.
(i hear anthony burgess said it needed an index. but i find that anthony burgess was usually wrong about his own writings, so what does he know about anyone elses?)

אָרַח

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by cavediver, posted 01-04-2006 4:27 AM cavediver has not replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 443 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 15 of 42 (275645)
01-04-2006 6:42 AM
Reply to: Message 7 by SuperNintendo Chalmers
01-04-2006 12:58 AM


Re: The subtlety of the gradual
There is plenty of evidence for other famous people from that time (Cicero, J Caesar, A Caesar, Marcus Brutus, Scipio, etC)
If there was one book written about caesar, then there is a whole room full of books written about Jesus, yet people take Caeser as fact, and Jesus as a myth.
Why would you expect to find evidence from a person who had nothing?
He walked the earth and stayed in peoples houses, and left no trail, thats what all the books tell us. There was a wooden cross, and that is it.
The books tell us there should be no evidence, except his word, which is exactly what we find. Droves a people who converted there religion during a time that was risky to do so, and continues to this day.
Matthew 26
quote:
Jesus Anointed at Bethany
6While Jesus was in Bethany in the home of a man known as Simon the Leper, 7a woman came to him with an alabaster jar of very expensive perfume, which she poured on his head as he was reclining at the table.
8 When the disciples saw this, they were indignant. "Why this waste?" they asked. 9 "This perfume could have been sold at a high price and the money given to the poor."
10 Aware of this, Jesus said to them, "Why are you bothering this woman? She has done a beautiful thing to me. 11 The poor you will always have with you, but you will not always have me. 12 When she poured this perfume on my body, she did it to prepare me for burial. 13I tell you the truth, wherever this gospel is preached throughout the world, what she has done will also be told, in memory of her."
And that is exactly what happened. Pretty good 2000 year old prediction.
I mean what do you expect to find? The Holy Grail? The ark of the convenant?
Its not like there was money with Jesus's face on it or something.
The evidence is in his words.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by SuperNintendo Chalmers, posted 01-04-2006 12:58 AM SuperNintendo Chalmers has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 18 by crashfrog, posted 01-04-2006 6:11 PM riVeRraT has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024