Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,352 Year: 3,609/9,624 Month: 480/974 Week: 93/276 Day: 21/23 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Prophecy in the Bible - Theology of Double Fulfillment
Jazzns
Member (Idle past 3930 days)
Posts: 2657
From: A Better America
Joined: 07-23-2004


Message 1 of 2 (527467)
10-01-2009 1:06 PM


Prophecy in the Bible - Theology of Double Fulfillment
I recently became interested in studying the Book of Daniel. I have read a lot about the controversies surrounding the origins of Daniel but what I am really interested in is this notion of prophetic double (or multi) fulfillment.
The reason I am sticking with Daniel is this. Most people agree that Daniel was fulfilled (or written contemporaneously) with the warring between Antiochus and Ptolemy in the 2nd century B.C. Even if you believe that Daniel was written earlier, Daniel 12 suggests that nobody should know about it until it happens anyway. The fact that we do and the very accurate description of Palestine as a battlefront between the Antiochus and Ptolemy seems to make it pretty clear that Daniel 11 is a description of Antiochus as the "despicable person" and the one who desecrates the temple, etc.
But if you look at people who are deep into end-times thinking and writing right now they are basically saying that the events from Daniel 11 are going to happen again followed by the first fulfillment of Daniel 12. My question is, what is the Biblical support for this theology of double fulfillment? Even if you take for granted that Daniel 12 is yet to come and was not a failed prophecy, what Biblical support is there for another fulfillment of 11? You could broaden this topic to any other prophecy that is claimed to either BE a double fulfillment or that WILL HAVE a double fulfillment although I would like to focus on Daniel as a base example and would like to bring in the PRIMARY Biblical support for why double fulfillment is even valid theology.
I'll tell you right now that what I am NOT looking for is an argument that double fulfillment must be true in order to make the Bible accurate. I am looking for direct theological, historical, and Biblical evidence that we SHOULD consider double fulfillment as a valid method for interpreting prophecy in its own right.
I would love input from Christians as well as non-Christian Bible experts such as Brian if he is around.
Bible Accuracy Forum please.

If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be. --Thomas Jefferson

AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 2 of 2 (527479)
10-01-2009 1:34 PM


Thread Copied to The Bible: Accuracy and Inerrancy Forum
Thread copied to the Prophecy in the Bible - Theology of Double Fulfillment thread in the The Bible: Accuracy and Inerrancy forum, this copy of the thread has been closed.

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024