Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9161 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,584 Year: 2,841/9,624 Month: 686/1,588 Week: 92/229 Day: 3/61 Hour: 3/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Biological classification vs 'Kind'
killinghurts
Member (Idle past 4983 days)
Posts: 150
Joined: 04-23-2008


Message 1 of 2 (562126)
05-25-2010 9:14 PM


Many times on this forum I have seen the work 'kind' used by creationists to classify organisms into groups in order to attempt to explain the biodiversity we see on earth today. This classification is central to the flood story and also central to the refutation of common ancestry.
Science currently has a classification system (not without with its' own problems) however I would like to hear from a creationist:
1) a clear definition of what 'kind' actually means to the creationist, and
2) where the definition of 'kind' differs from the commonly accepted scientific biological classification system.

Admin
Director
Posts: 12993
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.1


Message 2 of 2 (562165)
05-26-2010 7:57 AM


Thread Copied to Biological Evolution Forum
Thread copied to the Biological classification vs 'Kind' thread in the Biological Evolution forum, this copy of the thread has been closed.

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024