Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,482 Year: 3,739/9,624 Month: 610/974 Week: 223/276 Day: 63/34 Hour: 2/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Scientific terms and terminology - defining and using
CK
Member (Idle past 4150 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 1 of 2 (228368)
08-01-2005 8:31 AM


In another thread - a debate with faith over the use of the word "proof" (Faith feels that science is something that proves things) led to the following remark:
quote:
I'm using ordinary everyday language which is quite understandable and a lot clearer
So - this is very simple, when we have a discussion of the sciences between people who already have a basic knowledge of the area - is it better to use everyday langauge because it's a "lot clearer" than the specific terminology that we current do*?
Faith suggests that if people get stuck that
quote:
You can figure out what I'm saying if you are willing to, could ask for clarification if you don't.
Are we a bit too strict asking people to use fact, law, theory as they are used in the sciences? What's wrong with us all just defining the terms ourselves?

AdminSylas
Inactive Member


Message 2 of 2 (228743)
08-02-2005 8:35 AM


Thread copied to the Scientific terms and terminology - defining and using thread in the Is It Science? forum, this copy of the thread has been closed.

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024