Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,332 Year: 3,589/9,624 Month: 460/974 Week: 73/276 Day: 1/23 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Egyptians and the Flood
EvO-DuDe
Inactive Member


Message 1 of 16 (14247)
07-26-2002 7:58 PM


Creationists believe that the flood happened around 4500 years ago, or around 2500 BC. However, there seems to be a problem. The Egyptians were building pyramids before when the flood supposedly happened, during the flood, and immediately after the flood, when supposedly everyone was dead except for Noah and his family. The Egyptians were building pyramids from 2700 BC until around 50 BC, however, the main era for building pyramids was from 2700 BC until 2350 BC. Wouldn't all of the pyramids older than 2500 BC have been destroyed in an event so devestating as a global flood? How could the pyramids built right after 2500 BC have been built, when everyone was supposed to be dead except for Noah and his family? Why don't the egyptians mention any global flood in their myths and stories?
[This message has been edited by EvO-DuDe, 07-27-2002]

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by John, posted 07-26-2002 9:20 PM EvO-DuDe has not replied
 Message 10 by Tranquility Base, posted 07-28-2002 9:39 PM EvO-DuDe has not replied
 Message 14 by Peter, posted 08-01-2002 3:58 AM EvO-DuDe has not replied

  
John
Inactive Member


Message 2 of 16 (14249)
07-26-2002 9:20 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by EvO-DuDe
07-26-2002 7:58 PM


quote:
Originally posted by EvO-DuDe:
Creationists believe that the flood happened around 4500 years ago, or around 2500 BC. However, there seems to be a problem.
I've never seen a date this recent. Usually it is somewhere around 6000 years ago, 4000 bc.
The rest of your points still stand though, with a little bit of modification.
------------------
www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by EvO-DuDe, posted 07-26-2002 7:58 PM EvO-DuDe has not replied

  
EvO-DuDe
Inactive Member


Message 3 of 16 (14250)
07-26-2002 9:38 PM


Ummmm.... creationists believe that the earth is six thousand years old. They believe that the flood happened somewhere between 2500 BC - 2300 BC.
Well, that's what Answers in Genesis claims anyway.

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by John, posted 07-26-2002 10:19 PM EvO-DuDe has not replied

  
John
Inactive Member


Message 4 of 16 (14251)
07-26-2002 10:19 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by EvO-DuDe
07-26-2002 9:38 PM


quote:
Originally posted by EvO-DuDe:
Ummmm.... creationists believe that the earth is six thousand years old. They believe that the flood happened somewhere between 2500 BC - 2300 BC.
Well, that's what Answers in Genesis claims anyway.

oops.... I should read more carefully.... sorry
------------------
www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by EvO-DuDe, posted 07-26-2002 9:38 PM EvO-DuDe has not replied

  
EvO-DuDe
Inactive Member


Message 5 of 16 (14268)
07-27-2002 10:35 PM


Well? The creationists don't have a reply? This is very strong evidence that there was not a global flood.

Replies to this message:
 Message 6 by John, posted 07-27-2002 11:53 PM EvO-DuDe has not replied

  
John
Inactive Member


Message 6 of 16 (14273)
07-27-2002 11:53 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by EvO-DuDe
07-27-2002 10:35 PM


quote:
Originally posted by EvO-DuDe:
Well? The creationists don't have a reply? This is very strong evidence that there was not a global flood.
Yeah, wierd huh?
------------------
http://www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by EvO-DuDe, posted 07-27-2002 10:35 PM EvO-DuDe has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by frank, posted 07-28-2002 3:11 AM John has replied

  
frank
Inactive Member


Message 7 of 16 (14282)
07-28-2002 3:11 AM
Reply to: Message 6 by John
07-27-2002 11:53 PM


They probably took the weekend off. Let's see if anyone replies early in the work week.
Clear Skies !
Frank

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by John, posted 07-27-2002 11:53 PM John has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 8 by John, posted 07-28-2002 11:59 AM frank has not replied

  
John
Inactive Member


Message 8 of 16 (14298)
07-28-2002 11:59 AM
Reply to: Message 7 by frank
07-28-2002 3:11 AM


quote:
Originally posted by frank:
They probably took the weekend off. Let's see if anyone replies early in the work week.
Clear Skies !
Frank

What? You mean not everyone checks for new posts every five minutes?
------------------
http://www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by frank, posted 07-28-2002 3:11 AM frank has not replied

  
EvO-DuDe
Inactive Member


Message 9 of 16 (14310)
07-28-2002 2:39 PM


Creationists, this problem will not go away even if you choose to ignore it!
It seems to me like the only thing creationists can say was that the Egyptians were big liars about when they built their pyramids and when different pharaohs ruled.

  
Tranquility Base
Inactive Member


Message 10 of 16 (14333)
07-28-2002 9:39 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by EvO-DuDe
07-26-2002 7:58 PM


Creationists are not overly dogmatic that the flood was in 2500 to 2300BC but I would normally suppoose those dates. There are mainstream movements to bring forward some of the Egyptian dates a couple of hundred years due to other problems that they have. A tiny bit of wriggling room on both sides can solve the problem. It's interesting, extremely constraining but not a flood killer.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by EvO-DuDe, posted 07-26-2002 7:58 PM EvO-DuDe has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 11 by John, posted 07-28-2002 11:00 PM Tranquility Base has replied

  
John
Inactive Member


Message 11 of 16 (14343)
07-28-2002 11:00 PM
Reply to: Message 10 by Tranquility Base
07-28-2002 9:39 PM


quote:
Originally posted by Tranquility Base:
Creationists are not overly dogmatic that the flood was in 2500 to 2300BC but I would normally suppoose those dates. There are mainstream movements to bring forward some of the Egyptian dates a couple of hundred years due to other problems that they have. A tiny bit of wriggling room on both sides can solve the problem. It's interesting, extremely constraining but not a flood killer.
I disagree TB. Bringing forward those dates doesn't eliminate problem of a population developing from Noah's family to one large enough to build the many cultures contemporaneous with the ancient Israelites.
------------------
http://www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by Tranquility Base, posted 07-28-2002 9:39 PM Tranquility Base has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by Tranquility Base, posted 07-28-2002 11:03 PM John has replied

  
Tranquility Base
Inactive Member


Message 12 of 16 (14344)
07-28-2002 11:03 PM
Reply to: Message 11 by John
07-28-2002 11:00 PM


John
We've had a whole thread on that issue recenly. It truly seemed that the issue was very constraining but not impossible for the flood scenario. It depended on assumptions of number of kids and stuff like that. If I'm not mistaken you were involved in the thread (?)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by John, posted 07-28-2002 11:00 PM John has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 13 by John, posted 07-28-2002 11:11 PM Tranquility Base has not replied

  
John
Inactive Member


Message 13 of 16 (14346)
07-28-2002 11:11 PM
Reply to: Message 12 by Tranquility Base
07-28-2002 11:03 PM


quote:
Originally posted by Tranquility Base:
John
We've had a whole thread on that issue recenly. It truly seemed that the issue was very constraining but not impossible for the flood scenario. It depended on assumptions of number of kids and stuff like that. If I'm not mistaken you were involved in the thread (?)

I've been involved in several such debates. All of them have died off now. I put quite a lot of effort into demonstrating that there is quite a bit more than a little constraint going on. I looked up population growth statistics, food supply as effecting reproduction, etc.
------------------
http://www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by Tranquility Base, posted 07-28-2002 11:03 PM Tranquility Base has not replied

  
Peter
Member (Idle past 1497 days)
Posts: 2161
From: Cambridgeshire, UK.
Joined: 02-05-2002


Message 14 of 16 (14624)
08-01-2002 3:58 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by EvO-DuDe
07-26-2002 7:58 PM


And in the Chinese calander it 4699 years since the reign
of the Yellow King (or something like that).
The chinese have a history which pre-dates their dating method,
and the current years mean that the 4500 years ago flood
date must be wrong ... or are the Chinese lying ?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by EvO-DuDe, posted 07-26-2002 7:58 PM EvO-DuDe has not replied

  
EvO-DuDe
Inactive Member


Message 15 of 16 (14678)
08-01-2002 8:42 PM


Of course they were lying. Everyone knows that the chinese and the egyptians were big liars and nothing they said should be trusted. *rolls eyes*

Replies to this message:
 Message 16 by John, posted 08-01-2002 11:08 PM EvO-DuDe has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024