In another thread, tesla claimed to have a working Creationist model that explains observed evidence and presumably rationalizes it with the Biblical account:
quote:
If the new model really did explain what is seen better than the current model, I would of course accept it.
then is it off topic for me to propose a new model with evidence?
Since that would be off-topic for that thread, I'm proposing a topic at tesla's request for any Creationist who can propose a real, working model of Creation that they believe offers a better representation of the processes by which life reached its current point than the Evolution model.
Creationists should be expected to back up their model with evidence, and respond to rebuttal.
I realize this is a pretty broad topic, but I'm at a loss as to how to narrow down a request for a Creationist model. Accuracy and Inerrancy is probably the best fit.
Every time a fundy breaks the laws of thermodynamics, Schroedinger probably kills his cat.