Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,356 Year: 3,613/9,624 Month: 484/974 Week: 97/276 Day: 25/23 Hour: 3/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Marsupial evolution
Pete OS
Junior Member (Idle past 6119 days)
Posts: 31
Joined: 04-26-2007


Message 1 of 2 (398274)
04-30-2007 1:10 AM


It is often said, it support of evolution, that the marsupials are "more similar" to each other then to their similar looking placental counterpart. This was one of the major lines of evidence that convinced me of evolution. But I would like to dig deeper into this. When scientists say they are more similar, to they refer to bone structure or genetic similarities? Indeed, these must both be true if in reality they evolved from a more recent common ancestor then they share with the placentals; but exactly which lines is more obvious to scientists? Is there a site where the specific evidence is drawn out, perhaps with pictures of the bone structures or descriptions of similar mutations in non-coding dna shared by the marsupials but not the placentals?
Thank you.

AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 2 of 2 (398279)
04-30-2007 1:41 AM


Thread copied to the Marsupial evolution thread in the Biological Evolution forum, this copy of the thread has been closed.

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024