Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
8 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,461 Year: 3,718/9,624 Month: 589/974 Week: 202/276 Day: 42/34 Hour: 5/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Limits on Abortion
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 97 of 230 (387786)
03-02-2007 5:36 PM
Reply to: Message 96 by petrophysics1
03-02-2007 5:31 PM


Re: NJ supported by science
quote:
One could take the hate being directed at you as proof that you are correct.
Yeah. Hatred is usually a good sign that the hated person is correct. That's why Nazis and the KKK are probably correct.

Actually, if their god makes better pancakes, I'm totally switching sides. -- Charley the Australopithecine

This message is a reply to:
 Message 96 by petrophysics1, posted 03-02-2007 5:31 PM petrophysics1 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 98 by petrophysics1, posted 03-02-2007 5:37 PM Chiroptera has replied

  
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 102 of 230 (387792)
03-02-2007 5:56 PM
Reply to: Message 98 by petrophysics1
03-02-2007 5:37 PM


Re: NJ supported by science
I'm not saying that it is either normal or abnormal; I was quoting your comment that the hate being directed at nem is evidence that he is correct.
People might be hating him, or they might not.
The hatred may be normal, or it might not.
Nem might even be correct, or he might not.
But I'm pretty sure that even if he's right, the hatred directed toward him doesn't count as evidence of it.

Actually, if their god makes better pancakes, I'm totally switching sides. -- Charley the Australopithecine

This message is a reply to:
 Message 98 by petrophysics1, posted 03-02-2007 5:37 PM petrophysics1 has not replied

  
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 105 of 230 (387803)
03-02-2007 7:02 PM
Reply to: Message 104 by iano
03-02-2007 6:58 PM


Re: Greater hate hath...huh?
Too bad there isn't a "Nomination for Longest Subtitle With the Most Tortured Syntax of the Month" thread.

Actually, if their god makes better pancakes, I'm totally switching sides. -- Charley the Australopithecine

This message is a reply to:
 Message 104 by iano, posted 03-02-2007 6:58 PM iano has not replied

  
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 106 of 230 (387804)
03-02-2007 7:05 PM
Reply to: Message 104 by iano
03-02-2007 6:58 PM


Oh, and I should add....
quote:
...the fact that the vast majority of abortions are merely self-serving lifestyle choices....
Whether this is true or not, there is nothing wrong with self-serving lifestyle choices when there is no harm done to another person.

Actually, if their god makes better pancakes, I'm totally switching sides. -- Charley the Australopithecine

This message is a reply to:
 Message 104 by iano, posted 03-02-2007 6:58 PM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 110 by iano, posted 03-02-2007 7:37 PM Chiroptera has replied

  
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 112 of 230 (387821)
03-02-2007 8:19 PM
Reply to: Message 110 by iano
03-02-2007 7:37 PM


Re: Oh, and I should add....
quote:
Which is not something we can speak of when it comes to defining personhood.
Sure we can. We do it all the time.
People eat beef because cows are defined to be not "persons".
Conservatives advocate capital punishment because, even though they acknowledge that murders are people, they nonetheless have forfeited the rights of "personhood".
On another thread, Tal acknowledge that innocent civilians killed in US military actions in Iraq are "persons" who have the rights of "personhood", but nonetheless we shouldn't feel guilty about their deaths while waging a "just war".
We make judgements about "personhood" and their rights all the time.
Why on earth should cancer tumors, tapeworms, and fetuses be any different?
-
quote:
Let's agree that the harm part of the proceedings is established in any case.
So you think we should just agree that you are right? Why should I be surprised to see you suggest this?

Actually, if their god makes better pancakes, I'm totally switching sides. -- Charley the Australopithecine

This message is a reply to:
 Message 110 by iano, posted 03-02-2007 7:37 PM iano has not replied

  
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 150 of 230 (387937)
03-03-2007 6:03 PM
Reply to: Message 149 by Straggler
03-03-2007 5:55 PM


Re: Answering the detractors
quote:
Hence the...inconsistencies in most positions on this topic.
Hi, Straggler.
Actually, I think a lot of the inconsistencies probably stem from the attempt to explain the position to nonbelievers rather than from the position itself.
For example, the anti-woman anti-sex anti-abortion position is: God thinks that women should be baby producing machines. And fetuses have souls, too.
But they realize that the non-lunatics would think they were daft if they were to just come out an say it. So they have to make up a bunch of junk that they don't understand or believe to try to make up a reasonable argument for their position.

Actually, if their god makes better pancakes, I'm totally switching sides. -- Charley the Australopithecine

This message is a reply to:
 Message 149 by Straggler, posted 03-03-2007 5:55 PM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 151 by Straggler, posted 03-03-2007 6:29 PM Chiroptera has not replied

  
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 181 of 230 (388069)
03-04-2007 2:24 PM
Reply to: Message 180 by anastasia
03-04-2007 2:21 PM


Re: Obvious Examples
quote:
Funny, but Rob doesn't even understand what I say half the time.
I doubt that Rob understands what he writes half the time.
Oh shit! Did I hit "Submit Reply"?

Actually, if their god makes better pancakes, I'm totally switching sides. -- Charley the Australopithecine

This message is a reply to:
 Message 180 by anastasia, posted 03-04-2007 2:21 PM anastasia has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024