Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,427 Year: 3,684/9,624 Month: 555/974 Week: 168/276 Day: 8/34 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Limits on Abortion
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 61 of 230 (387506)
02-28-2007 8:40 PM
Reply to: Message 37 by Straggler
02-28-2007 9:06 AM


Heinous
Prosecuting for murder women desperate enough to throw themselves down stairs in the hope of miscarrying seems unnecessarily harsh to the point of evil.
But some how this isn't...?

"A man can no more diminish God's glory by refusing to worship Him than a lunatic can put out the sun by scribbling the word, 'darkness' on the walls of his cell." -C.S. Lewis

This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by Straggler, posted 02-28-2007 9:06 AM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 63 by docpotato, posted 02-28-2007 10:18 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied
 Message 69 by mick, posted 03-01-2007 5:37 AM Hyroglyphx has not replied
 Message 126 by Straggler, posted 03-03-2007 8:02 AM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2191 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 62 of 230 (387507)
02-28-2007 8:51 PM
Reply to: Message 51 by Hyroglyphx
02-28-2007 4:25 PM


Re: Probability
quote:
My wife had a child before she was able to properly care for her. What did she do? She did the unselfish, and far more difficult thing to do, which is give her up for adoption.
Difficult, indeed.
A woman's risk of dying from abortion-related complications in this country (0.4 deaths per 100,000 procedures performed before eight weeks' gestation) is significantly lower than her risk of dying as the result of pregnancy or childbirth (seven deaths per 100,000 live births).

This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by Hyroglyphx, posted 02-28-2007 4:25 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
docpotato
Member (Idle past 5069 days)
Posts: 334
From: Portland, OR
Joined: 07-18-2003


Message 63 of 230 (387525)
02-28-2007 10:18 PM
Reply to: Message 61 by Hyroglyphx
02-28-2007 8:40 PM


iPod!
You can put that video on your iPod? I thought having porn on mine was cool, but this takes it to a whole new level. Look out fellow bus riders, there's a new thing to be uncomfortable about!!!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 61 by Hyroglyphx, posted 02-28-2007 8:40 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1488 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 64 of 230 (387528)
02-28-2007 10:34 PM
Reply to: Message 59 by Hyroglyphx
02-28-2007 8:12 PM


Re: Probability
It would be handled like any other gynecological exam. If abortion were illegal then gynecologists would likely be mandated to speak out should any suspicions of a self-induced abortion present themselves.
Christ.
Think it through. Why would women go to gynecologists ever if they thought that, at the slightest indication that their miscarriage might have been the result of something they did, their doctor would turn them over to the police?
Do you remember when I talked about a decline in pre-natal care? Why did you think I suspected that would happen? I was just being cute?
If you come home one day and you find a family of yours dead at the bottom of the stairs in a pool of blood, are you going to throw your hands in the air in incredulity, and say, "Well, we don't if they tripped or if they were pushed. What on earth are we to do?"
And when a miscarriage happens - it's just a bloody mass in the toilet that nobody knows about but the mother - how are the police going to even know about it?
You have this fantasy of a miscarriage leaving a crime scene for CSI to pour over, and Crossing Jordan performing an autopsy on a tiny little murder victim - as though you could make a Y-incision on a blastocyst and find the cause of death.
No. The future you're talking about is a future where a woman's sexual history, political activities, and other private matters are put under public scrutiny, searching for the slightest hint that she might not have been completely broken up about the idea of a miscarriage. Any hint that she might have had the slightest complicity.
That future is a horror, and I'll fight to the last breath to prevent it. It disgusts me - and the worst part is, you refuse to even contemplate the fact that you're promoting it. Your stubborn refusal to think through the consequences is smug, smarmy, and offensive. These are women's lives we're talking about, NJ. That you so easily dismiss that is disgusting.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by Hyroglyphx, posted 02-28-2007 8:12 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 65 of 230 (387533)
02-28-2007 11:01 PM
Reply to: Message 41 by crashfrog
02-28-2007 11:05 AM


Re: Probability
In fact, this doesn't happen only in my mind; this is literally exactly what happens in societies that criminalize abortion.
Which countries are you referring to? Yemen? Afghanistan? Tunisia?
When you force birth, you have parents who don't care that much about their children. Why would they? When you view pregnancy as a punishment for being promiscuous, you have a society that doesn't treat women as people. Why would they?
Giving birth is not a punishment for promiscuity, especially for those who are married. Its called "responsibility." Its called "being accountable for your actions."
NJ, what on Earth could be the possible benefit to society of forced birth?
A lower homicide rate. What benefit is their in killing your own babies?
Why is it that you never do any research about the consequences of the things you advocate? I've never met anybody as reckless as you in that regard.
How about the consequences of abortion? The moral implications? The social implications? This is madness and you are completely imbued and sold out on the pretty picture painted to you by the pro-abortion movement.
Lets try a new approach. Instead of saying why the pro-life movement is so terrible, explain to me your rationale about why the pro-abortion gang is so good. Explain to me why you feel that a fetus is no big deal and why you are so certain of it.

"A man can no more diminish God's glory by refusing to worship Him than a lunatic can put out the sun by scribbling the word, 'darkness' on the walls of his cell." -C.S. Lewis

This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by crashfrog, posted 02-28-2007 11:05 AM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 66 by crashfrog, posted 03-01-2007 12:57 AM Hyroglyphx has replied
 Message 67 by docpotato, posted 03-01-2007 1:32 AM Hyroglyphx has not replied
 Message 73 by FliesOnly, posted 03-01-2007 7:55 AM Hyroglyphx has not replied
 Message 79 by docpotato, posted 03-01-2007 4:18 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1488 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 66 of 230 (387538)
03-01-2007 12:57 AM
Reply to: Message 65 by Hyroglyphx
02-28-2007 11:01 PM


Re: Probability
Instead of saying why the pro-life movement is so terrible, explain to me your rationale about why the pro-abortion gang is so good.
Easily.
This:
isn't a person. This doesn't have a soul, this doesn't have rights, this doesn't have a mind; this isn't an infant, a child, a baby, or an "unborn person." This is a fetus, something that cannot feel, or know, or fear. It's as sensate and aware as a potted fern. And it's destruction, happening as it does a hundred times a day in the normal course of human biology, is no more significant or troubling to me than leaves falling from a tree.
But this:
this is a person; this does have rights, and one of those rights is the right to a certain degree of self-determination and physical autonomy. The right to privacy! The right not to have her panties sniffed by moralist busybodies more concerned about a couple of cells than the rights of a person.
The world of cheap and easy access to abortion is a world where a woman is never forced, against her will, to undergo the stresses and dangers of pregnancy. It's a world where children don't, for the most part, grow up in homes where they're hated. It's a world where birth is celebrated, not feared, because it happens when it's prepared for. It's a world where women who enjoy sex - which is all of them - aren't labeled "sluts" for simply having bodies.
It's a world where there's less crime, because children aren't forced on families that don't have the resources to see to their education and upbringing. It's a world where no child lives a tragic, brutal, painful, short life due to a detectable, terminal illness. Search for images of "harlequin babies" and tell me, honestly and from your heart, that an abortion - before there was even a mind there to suffer - wouldn't have been a mercy. It's a world where a child is never born addicted to drugs (like three of my cousins) because a mother who knew she couldn't be a fit parent had access to abortion, regardless of her ability to pay for it.
The consequences of abortion is that no child need grow up, fatherless, knowing that every minute of their life was an agonizing reminder of their mother's rape. The consequence of abortion is that no child need grow up in a family that doesn't want them. The consequence of abortion, paradoxically, is that society becomes so comfortable with sexuality, reproduction, and parenthood that abortion becomes hardly ever necessary - because a society motivated by concern for parents, children, and reproductive freedom stresses profligate access to contraception, and contracepting couples have almost no need for abortions.
The world of easy access to abortion is a net positive for everyone - including the unborn, because a society where every birth is voluntary is a society where every birth is treasured, and women receive the pre-natal care they need for healthy infants, regardless of their ability to pay.
But your world?
Your world is a world of these women:
because this is how you and your cohorts see women - invisible, blank, except for the baby parts. Your world is a world where women are mandated by law to turn over their menstrual discharge monthly, so that unimplanted zygotes might receive their "proper" burial. (They're human beings, right? Why shouldn't they receive last rites?) Your world is a world where women are informed by doctors that, regardless of their plans or lack of same to have children, they should consider themselves "pre-pregnant", and comport themselves thusly, because their sole worth to society is located about six inches south of the navel.
Your world is a world where the tragedy of a miscarriage is compounded by official suspicion and inquiry; where any past history of advocacy for women's rights, women's equality, or women's self-determination becomes incriminating evidence in her trial. Where any hint that she views herself as more than a baby machine is twisted by zealous (and male) prosecutors into proof that she committed "murder of the unborn."
And the weirdest part is - your world is a world where there's just as many abortions as there are now! Your world's abortion ban is as effective as trying to cure colds by banning sneezing. Because sex is viewed as something sinful, something best avoided, something serious and never to be enjoyed - and something completely taboo to talk about, contraception is unknown. Thus, necessitating the very abortions you claim to want to prevent!
Your world is a world where a scared 14-year-old girl, in a considerable amount of trouble, finds no succor from her friends, or family, or doctors (who she can't trust, since they're under an ethical obligation to report her dismay at finding herself pregnant); who finds no relief or help at any corner but the back-alley abortionist, or ridiculous and dangerous folk remedies, or potentially fatal coathangers, or - heartbreakingly - suicide.
Your world is a horror that I will fight to prevent, for the women in my life and for all women. Your world is an abomination that must never be allowed to pass - except that it has. The only consolation is that my world, too, has come to pass.
That's how I know what happens, NJ. I look at the societies where abortion is cheap, avaliable, and safe vs. the societies where abortion is a crime, enforced as murder. There's a reason why the former societies are some of the richest, free-est, most civilized nations, with the greatest respect and preservation of human dignity; and why the latter societies - the one you would build for us - are cesspools of oppression, crime, poverty, ignorance, and religious subversion of human freedom and independence.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 65 by Hyroglyphx, posted 02-28-2007 11:01 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 68 by kongstad, posted 03-01-2007 3:19 AM crashfrog has not replied
 Message 74 by Dan Carroll, posted 03-01-2007 10:10 AM crashfrog has not replied
 Message 81 by nator, posted 03-01-2007 4:48 PM crashfrog has replied
 Message 88 by macaroniandcheese, posted 03-02-2007 1:11 AM crashfrog has not replied
 Message 93 by Hyroglyphx, posted 03-02-2007 3:27 PM crashfrog has replied

  
docpotato
Member (Idle past 5069 days)
Posts: 334
From: Portland, OR
Joined: 07-18-2003


Message 67 of 230 (387540)
03-01-2007 1:32 AM
Reply to: Message 65 by Hyroglyphx
02-28-2007 11:01 PM


Re: Probability
Giving birth is not a punishment for promiscuity, especially for those who are married. Its called "responsibility." Its called "being accountable for your actions."
An abortion can also be seen as taking responsibility and being accountable for your actions.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 65 by Hyroglyphx, posted 02-28-2007 11:01 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
kongstad
Member (Idle past 2891 days)
Posts: 175
From: Copenhagen, Denmark
Joined: 02-24-2004


Message 68 of 230 (387544)
03-01-2007 3:19 AM
Reply to: Message 66 by crashfrog
03-01-2007 12:57 AM


Re: Probability
Bravo Crash!
I think I will save a link to this post for use in future discussions.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 66 by crashfrog, posted 03-01-2007 12:57 AM crashfrog has not replied

  
mick
Member (Idle past 5008 days)
Posts: 913
Joined: 02-17-2005


Message 69 of 230 (387546)
03-01-2007 5:37 AM
Reply to: Message 61 by Hyroglyphx
02-28-2007 8:40 PM


some political steps that would be acceptable to both prolife and prochoice movements
Hi nemesis,
I appreciate that you find that heinous. The question is, how can you reduce the incidence of abortion, in line with your pro-life views, in a way that does not result in bitter acrimony between you and people from the other end of the political spectrum who think that a woman's dignity and right to choose is the most important political principle? The all or nothing approach of making abortion completely illegal just isn't going to work in the US because there are too many people like crashfrog for you to succeed! What you need to do is promote your interests in a more politic manner. What you need to do is reach a consensus with people like crashfrog on political steps that can advance both of your interests. Here are some examples:
a) campaign for free creches, childcare and nursery schools for all parents who want to make use of them so that couples do not feel obliged to have an abortion because they do not have time to care for a child.
b) campaign for decent living wages for all men and women so that couples and single people do not feel that an abortion is economically necessary.
c) campaign for the most open possible adoption system available, including gay and lesbian couples, single people, and young/inexperienced couples, so that the potential pool of adopting parents is as large as possible.
d) campaign for free universal healthcare for all men, women and children
e) campaign for women's rights in the workplace, so that women can work flexible hours or take time off if they need to care for their kids, without fearing the loss of their job.
f) campaign for paternal rights in the workplace, so that men can work flexible hours or take time off if they need to care for their kids, without fearing for the loss of their job.
g) campaign for better sex education for girls and boys so that they are more aware of the contraception possibilites that are available
h) campaign for free universal access to contraception for anybody who wants it
i) campaign for better women's rights in a cultural sense, so that girls grow up feeling that they are empowered and able to make decisions about their own health and lives, rather than seeing themselves as merely daughters, wives, sex objects or other property of men
j) campaign for improved social mobility, so that the cyclical link between poverty and abortion can be broken
The good thing about these suggestions is that the pro life movement would get full support from the pro choice movement - you would each have a better chance of success than if you worked alone and indeed in conflict with each other. The pro life movement's aim of reducing abortion as far as possible would be achieved; the pro choice movement's aim of promoting women's rights and dignity would be achieved; and also as a man I could get some time to spend with my kids.
Mick

This message is a reply to:
 Message 61 by Hyroglyphx, posted 02-28-2007 8:40 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 82 by nator, posted 03-01-2007 4:58 PM mick has not replied

  
FliesOnly
Member (Idle past 4166 days)
Posts: 797
From: Michigan
Joined: 12-01-2003


Message 70 of 230 (387550)
03-01-2007 6:57 AM
Reply to: Message 53 by docpotato
02-28-2007 5:26 PM


Re: Who is ...
docpotato writes:
Hey, we live in the same city. Let me come over, stay at your house for nine months, and all the while I'll eat your food, punch you in the stomach, and then forcibly stretch your genitals before I leave! Don't want me there? Fuck you! I'm stayin' and you can't kill me!
Oh yeah, and ejecting me from your house will kill me too.
This may be one of the best responses I have ever read...thanks.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 53 by docpotato, posted 02-28-2007 5:26 PM docpotato has not replied

  
FliesOnly
Member (Idle past 4166 days)
Posts: 797
From: Michigan
Joined: 12-01-2003


Message 71 of 230 (387551)
03-01-2007 7:01 AM
Reply to: Message 55 by macaroniandcheese
02-28-2007 6:59 PM


Re: Probability
brennakimi writes:
when my mother miscarried in 1980, they investigated her to make sure she hadn't done it on purpose... and this was with legal abortions.
Which makes it all the more scary, if NJ and his ilk get their way. Can you imagine? Yikes!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 55 by macaroniandcheese, posted 02-28-2007 6:59 PM macaroniandcheese has not replied

  
FliesOnly
Member (Idle past 4166 days)
Posts: 797
From: Michigan
Joined: 12-01-2003


Message 72 of 230 (387552)
03-01-2007 7:49 AM
Reply to: Message 59 by Hyroglyphx
02-28-2007 8:12 PM


Re: Probability
NJ writes:
Read what I'm saying because I've explained very clearly. The ambivalence is all on your side of the table. If you come home one day and you find a family of yours dead at the bottom of the stairs in a pool of blood, are you going to throw your hands in the air in incredulity, and say, "Well, we don't if they tripped or if they were pushed. What on earth are we to do?"
This is so utterly stupid and off target that I guess I have no response.
NJ writes:
You get someone to investigate it. Its the same with the hypothetical scenario. Its entirely possible that many people have been murdered on a stair case, whether pregnant or not, that got away. But you don't use this as some sort of reason re-legalize abortion in the event that some people get away with it. If they escape human justice, let be on their conscience until a Higher Authority deals with the act.
Ok, I guess I'll play along to see if I can't get it through your head how ridiculous you are being.
A pregnant women has fallen down the stairs. She says she tripped. The fall resulted in her having a miscarriage. Case closed, NJ. How would you even prove that she did it on purpose? Do you understand?
And every friggen miscarriage would HAVE to be treated as a crime...as in ALL of them...as in every single one.
Now, if you want to be some sort of "Grade A Asshole", and accuse every women that has a miscarriage of being a criminal, so be it. Me...well, I'm pretty much against that sort of thing.
NJ writes:
No, it really wouldn't. It would be handled like any other gynecological exam. If abortion were illegal then gynecologists would likely be mandated to speak out should any suspicions of a self-induced abortion present themselves.
You just don't think these things through, do you?
Crashfrog has done a far better job than I in explaining the stupidity of this argument, but here I go nonetheless.
If abortions were illegal, women would no go to the gynecologist. Christ, NJ, how hard is that to figure out?
Oh, and how, in the stair falling example, would a gynecological exam be of any value? Let's say that some poor women accidentally falls down the stairs and loses her baby. Let's suppose she's very distraught and her story sounds unconvincing to a jury of NJs. You would put her away for life as a murderer. What a guy NJ...what a great guy.
NJ writes:
If the gynecologist lied for the mother because he was sympathetic...
What if it went the other way NJ? What if he secretly loved this women and lied to punish her for her refusal to have an affair? Fry the bitch!
NJ writes:
...then let that be on his conscience too until a Higher Authority deals with it.
Why not treat ALL abortions in this manner right now? Drop your desire to make abortions illegal and let's just leave it up to God. I'm perfectly ok with that...as I'm sure most of us would be.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by Hyroglyphx, posted 02-28-2007 8:12 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
FliesOnly
Member (Idle past 4166 days)
Posts: 797
From: Michigan
Joined: 12-01-2003


Message 73 of 230 (387553)
03-01-2007 7:55 AM
Reply to: Message 65 by Hyroglyphx
02-28-2007 11:01 PM


Re: Probability
NJ writes:
Which countries are you referring to? Yemen? Afghanistan? Tunisia?
Yeah...cuz those women deserve to be criminals...what with being non-christians and all.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 65 by Hyroglyphx, posted 02-28-2007 11:01 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
Dan Carroll
Inactive Member


Message 74 of 230 (387570)
03-01-2007 10:10 AM
Reply to: Message 66 by crashfrog
03-01-2007 12:57 AM


Re: Probability
Your world is a world of these women:
In fairness, I think that diagram's inaccurate. Y'see, I pretty severely doubt that people who view women as blank baby vessels manage to acknowledge the existence of the clitoris.

"I know some of you are going to say 'I did look it up, and that's not true.' That's 'cause you looked it up in a book. Next time, look it up in your gut."
-Stephen Colbert

This message is a reply to:
 Message 66 by crashfrog, posted 03-01-2007 12:57 AM crashfrog has not replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 75 of 230 (387586)
03-01-2007 11:59 AM
Reply to: Message 46 by Dan Carroll
02-28-2007 1:47 PM


Danger and gestation
quote:
What I mean is that if there is a high probability of death for both parties, you must opt to save the mother because the child will die regardless.
Why both parties? If just the mother's life is in danger, doesn't she have the right to kill in self-defense?
If the mother is in danger then the baby is in danger, depending on the gestational period. A baby can survive outside of the womb as early as six months, but, of course, they will be premature.

"A man can no more diminish God's glory by refusing to worship Him than a lunatic can put out the sun by scribbling the word, 'darkness' on the walls of his cell." -C.S. Lewis

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by Dan Carroll, posted 02-28-2007 1:47 PM Dan Carroll has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 76 by Dan Carroll, posted 03-01-2007 12:10 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024