taylor_31 writes:
The problem is that I want to pick what's right - really right - for me in the long term.
'Tis not possible. You'll change your mind one day.
Anyway, I can recall my choice. I am a transhumanist - human enhancement has always interested me, and it became a goal of mine to see it come into being. Thus, I wanted to learn how to make humans better. I chose to study neuroscience because nerves control everything, and so any sort of prosthetic device will require connection to the nerves to be properly controlled.
The more I learn about what is possible, the more I want to stay in the field. Just imagine a future where you can learn a language by downloading it into your head; where you can communicate to another person by thoughts or where you could lose an arm, leg or organ and get a seamless replacement that could even outperform your old one.
However, part of my wishes I did zoology, just because it really interests me. But the other part knows that I will be bored of it eventually unless big things are happening in that field, so neuroscience is a better choice.
I could have done genetics too, as genetic engineering is another interesting area of research, but I think it may be too restricted for human use, too unpredictable, and ultimately too weak in comparison to cybernetic enhancements. Oh, and biomedical engineering would be interesting too, but ultimately I thought it to straightforward in comparison to the neurology side.
Help to inform the public - contribute to the EvoWiki today!
We seek contributors with a knowledge of Intelligent design to expand and review our page on this topic.
Registration not needed for editing most pages (the ID page is an exception), but you can register here!