Dangerous pro-choice extremists?

Please provide examples of hateful nutcases that are embraced by the conservatives. I think it would be helpful to get a handle of what you think constitutes hateful behavior in this context.I ask this because this statement: is an interesting observation but it needs to be bounded somehow.As an example: Every person who killed an doctor who performs abortions was immediately labeled an extremest by the pro-life movement and the churches. In one case (sorry no cites) the person was convinced to turn himself in by pro-lifers who he had asked to hide him.

Where's the violence. He lost a lawsuit for infringing on the profits of abortion clinics during his non-violent protests. I guess that paves the way for lawsuits against any non-violent protests that hurt a business. Nutty rhetoric - yes violent-no White supremacist - no history of violence When did he even advocate violence? Conservative anti-GW wild statements...violent...don't see it. wild rhetoric...where's the violence? His blatantly hateful statements and protests were criticized by Focus on the Family, Pat Robertson and through official statements by Assemblies of God, Church of God, and Southern Baptists to name a few. Those criticisms were issued back when he was protesting at funerals for gay men. Not embraced by majority of conservatives, then or now.So if wild and hateful rhetoric is the point at which you want to call these people dangerous then I can start looking for extremist rhetoric in the pro-choice ranks and provide you with a list of dangerous people. Thanks for the clarification.