Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,482 Year: 3,739/9,624 Month: 610/974 Week: 223/276 Day: 63/34 Hour: 2/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Dangerous pro-choice extremists?
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2664 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 72 of 113 (444059)
12-28-2007 3:27 AM
Reply to: Message 71 by obvious Child
12-28-2007 2:53 AM


Re: Your E-V-I-D-E-N-C-E?
Obvious, you lazy SOB.
For god's sake hit google and come up with something besides some dude that planted 3 "bombs" (three!) and some other dude that beat the s*** out of a guy with an axe handle.
Property damage is not terrorism.
Monkeywrenching is not terrorism.
Tree spiking is not terrorism.
Arson is not terrorism.
Oh. And one more thing.
Only one guy has been hurt as a result of tree spiking. And the mill admitted that their poorly maintained equipment was just as much at fault as the tree spike.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 71 by obvious Child, posted 12-28-2007 2:53 AM obvious Child has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 78 by obvious Child, posted 12-28-2007 7:16 PM molbiogirl has replied

  
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2664 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 75 of 113 (444165)
12-28-2007 1:57 PM
Reply to: Message 74 by Hyroglyphx
12-28-2007 1:35 PM


Juggs obviously cannot read
I have provided several links indicting them on very serious criminal charges ...
No, you didn't.
Had you bothered to read the first link you provided, you would have noticed, as I did, that all of the relevant material was posted by H.
The second link you provided had this to say:
scuttled two ships ... damage(d) the Icelandic whaling station
arson attack on research facilities at Michigan State University
release of mink from a nearby MSU mink research farm, wrecking equipment and opening animals' cages
dismantling a lion trap and spreading mountain lion urine
felony conspiracy to interfere with or injure a government official, misdemeanor interference with or injury to a forest officer, and misdemeanor depredation (theft or destruction or the attempt to do so) of government property
Note: He was fined $100 and served 8 months. Woo.
demonstrating the use of a destructive device
That's it.
All y'all really got (as I explained upthread) is three piddly "bombs" (none of which exploded) and one ass-kicking.
That, m'dear, is hardly "terrorism".

This message is a reply to:
 Message 74 by Hyroglyphx, posted 12-28-2007 1:35 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 76 by Hyroglyphx, posted 12-28-2007 6:58 PM molbiogirl has replied

  
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2664 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 77 of 113 (444245)
12-28-2007 7:14 PM
Reply to: Message 76 by Hyroglyphx
12-28-2007 6:58 PM


Juggs still has a reading problem.
The 65-count indictment alleges the defendants committed acts of domestic terrorism between 1996 and 2001 in Oregon, Wyoming, Washington, California, and Colorado. Specifically, the indictment includes charges related to arson, conspiracy, use of destructive devices, and destruction of an energy facility.
The charges are the same as I outlined earlier, chester.
By definition, arson/conspiracy/use of destructive devices/property damage are not terrorism.
The FBI can get its panties inna twist and call it domestic terrorism if it wants to. Doesn't make it so.
These aren't acts of vandalism, these are serious felonies.
Yep. Felonies. Still doesn't make them terrorism.
Suppose somebody left three piddly devices of unexploded ordinance at an abortion clinic... You don't think there would be hell to pay?
Considering that anti abortionist nuts have killed abortion providers and employees...
wiki writes:
In the U.S., violence directed toward abortion providers has killed 7 people, including 3 doctors, 2 clinic employees, a security guard, and a clinic escort.[5]
* March 10, 1993: Dr. David Gunn of Pensacola, Florida was fatally shot during a protest. He had been the subject of wanted-style posters distributed by Operation Rescue in the summer of the year before. Michael F. Griffin was found guilty of Dr. Gunn's murder and was sentenced to life in prison.
* June 29, 1994: Dr. John Britton and James Barrett, a clinic escort, were both shot outside of another facility in Pensacola. Rev. Paul Jennings Hill was charged with the killings, received a death sentence, and was executed September 3, 2003.
* December 30, 1994: Two receptionists, Shannon Lowney and Lee Ann Nichols, were killed in a clinic attack in Brookline, Massachusetts. John Salvi, who prior to his arrest was distributing pamphlets from Human Life International,[6] was arrested and confessed to the killings. He committed suicide in prison and guards found his body under his bed with a plastic garbage bag tied around his head. Salvi had also confessed to a non-lethal attack in Norfolk, Virginia days before the Brookline killings.
* January 29, 1998: Robert Sanderson, an off-duty police officer who worked as a security guard at an abortion clinic in Birmingham, Alabama died when his workplace was bombed. Eric Robert Rudolph, who was also responsible for the 1996 Centennial Olympic Park bombing, was charged with the crime and received two life sentences as a result.
* October 23, 1998: Dr. Barnett Slepian was shot dead at his home in Amherst, New York. His was the last in a series of similar shootings against providers in Canada and northern New York state which were all likely committed by James Kopp. Kopp was convicted of Dr. Slepian's murder after finally being apprehended in France in 2001.
Considering that there is a 30 year history of kidnapping and death threats...
wiki writes:
According to statistics gathered by the National Abortion Federation (NAF), an organization of abortion providers, since 1977 in the United States and Canada, there have been 17 attempted murders, 383 death threats, 153 incidents of assault or battery, and 3 kidnappings committed against abortion providers.[8] The attempted murders were:[9][10][5]
* August 19, 1993: Dr. George Tiller was shot outside of an abortion facility in Wichita, Kansas. Shelley Shannon was charged with the crime and received an 11-year prison sentence.
* June 29, 1994: June Barret was shot in the same attack which claimed the lives of James Barrett, her husband, and Dr. John Britton.
* December 30, 1994: Five individuals were wounded in the same-day shootings which killed Shannon Lowney and Lee Ann Nichols.
* December 18, 1996: Dr. Calvin Jackson of New Orleans, Louisiana was stabbed 15 times, losing 4 pints of blood. Donald Cooper was charged with second-degree attempted murder and sentenced to 20 years.[11]
* October 28, 1997: A physician whose name has not been revealed was shot in his home in Rochester, New York.
* January 29, 1998: Emily Lyons, a nurse, was severely injured in the bombing which also killed Robert Sanderson.
* September 11, 2006 David McMenemy attempted a suicide bombing of a women's clinic in Davenport, Iowa after scouting targets throughout the Midwest. It was later revealed that the targeted clinic did not perform or make referrals for abortions.
Anthrax threats
The first letters claiming to contain anthrax were mailed to U.S. clinics in October 1998, a few days after the Slepian shooting, and since then, there have been a total of 655 such bioterror threats made against abortion providers. None of the "anthrax" in these cases was real.
November 2001: After the genuine 2001 anthrax attacks, Clayton Waagner mailed hoax letters containing a white powder to 554 clinics. Waagner was convicted of 51 charges relating to the anthrax scare on December 3, 2003.
Considering that there is a 30 year history of 91 bombings/arsons...
wiki writes:
According to NAF, since 1977 in the United States and Canada, property crimes committed against abortion providers have included 41 bombings, 173 arsons, 91 attempted bombings or arsons, 619 bomb threats, 1630 incidents of trespassing, 1264 incidents of vandalism, and 100 attacks with butyric acid ("stink bombs").[8] The first clinic arson occurred in Oregon in March 1976 and the first bombing occurred in February 1978 in Ohio.[13] More recent incidents have included:[5]
* October 1999: Martin Uphoff set fire to a Planned Parenthood clinic in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, causing US$100 worth of damage. He was later sentenced to 60 months in prison.
* May 28, 2000: An arson at a clinic in Concord, New Hampshire on resulted in damage estimated at US$20,000.
* October 1, 2000: A Catholic priest drove his car into the Northern Illinois Health Clinic after learning that the FDA had approved the drug RU-486. He pulled out an ax before being shot at by a security guard.
* June 11, 2001: A bombing at a clinic in Tacoma, Washington on destroyed a wall, resulting in US$6000 in damages
* July 4, 2005: A clinic Palm Beach, Florida was the target of an arson.
* December 12, 2005: Patricia Hughes and Jeremy Dunahoe threw a Molotov cocktail at a clinic in Shreveport, Louisiana. The device missed the building and no damage was caused. In August 2006, Hughes was sentenced to six years in prison, and Dunahoe to one year.
* April 25, 2007: A package left at a women's health clinic in Austin, Texas contained an explosive device capable of inflicting serious injury or death. A bomb squad detonated the device. [14]
* May 9, 2007: An unidentified person deliberately set fire to a Planned Parenthood clinic in Virginia Beach, Virginia.[15]
* December 6, 2007: Two unidentified persons set fire to a Planned Parenthood clinic in Albuquerque, New Mexico. [16]
... why do you suppose that the FBI has NOT chosen to call this activity "domestic terrorism"?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 76 by Hyroglyphx, posted 12-28-2007 6:58 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 96 by Hyroglyphx, posted 12-29-2007 12:09 PM molbiogirl has replied

  
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2664 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 80 of 113 (444254)
12-28-2007 7:25 PM
Reply to: Message 78 by obvious Child
12-28-2007 7:16 PM


Re: Your E-V-I-D-E-N-C-E?
Yet oddly, pro-life people who do that are called terrorists.
Cite please.
If a pro-life conservative uses a bomb against someone, he's a terrorist.
I did not say that an anti abortion wingnut is a terrorist. You did.
Then what IS terrorism?
1983 Beruit Marine barracks bombing.
1993 WTC bombing.
1998 American Embassy bombing.
2000 USS Cole bombing.
911.
Not the point.
It is when you keep harping about the horrific dangers to timber industry employees.
The fact is, tree spikes don't do any harm to timber industry employees. Nor do they harm the equipment.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 78 by obvious Child, posted 12-28-2007 7:16 PM obvious Child has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 83 by obvious Child, posted 12-28-2007 7:34 PM molbiogirl has replied

  
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2664 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 82 of 113 (444260)
12-28-2007 7:34 PM
Reply to: Message 81 by obvious Child
12-28-2007 7:27 PM


Are you reading the thread, Obvious?
Why is that NONE OF THEM are willing to answer any of these types of questions?
It's like the mentality of "if it didn't happen to me, it's not terrorism" is rampant here.
I have addressed this concern upthread.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 81 by obvious Child, posted 12-28-2007 7:27 PM obvious Child has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 84 by obvious Child, posted 12-28-2007 7:36 PM molbiogirl has replied

  
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2664 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 85 of 113 (444264)
12-28-2007 7:39 PM
Reply to: Message 83 by obvious Child
12-28-2007 7:34 PM


Re: Your E-V-I-D-E-N-C-E?
Will you state that none of the people on this list are terrorists in the isolated context of abortion clinic bombings?
You said that anti abortion wingnuts are "called terrorists". The cite you provided did not do so. I am awaiting proof of your bare assertion. Then I will answer your question.
So the act of placing potential booby traps to harm or kill workers is not an act of terrorism?
Booby trap: Noun
* (n) land mine, ground-emplaced mine, booby trap (an explosive mine hidden underground; explodes when stepped on or driven over)
* (n) pitfall, booby trap (an unforeseen or unexpected or surprising difficulty)
Pitfall, yes. Difficulty, yes. Explosive, no.
And it's a moot point, really.
Tree spikes are ineffective against both people and equipment.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 83 by obvious Child, posted 12-28-2007 7:34 PM obvious Child has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 87 by obvious Child, posted 12-28-2007 7:56 PM molbiogirl has replied

  
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2664 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 86 of 113 (444267)
12-28-2007 7:47 PM
Reply to: Message 84 by obvious Child
12-28-2007 7:36 PM


Re: Are you reading the thread, Obvious?
Terrorism: Premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against noncombatant targets by sub-national groups or clandestine agents, usually intended to influence an audience (Title 22 of the United States Code, Section 2656f(d)).
http://www.asme-iti.org/RAMCAP/Terminology.cfm
A psychological strategy of war for gaining political ends by deliberately creating a well-founded climate of fear among the civilian popuation.
http://www.naiadonline.ca/book/01Glossary.htm
The systematic use of terror, the deliberate creation and exploitation of fear for bringing about political change.
http://www.wps.prenhall.com/...,9681,1613226-content,00.html
You will note that 2 out of 3 definitions are military and the one that is not refers to SYSTEMATIC use.
One person planting 3 bombs (that did not explode) one time is neither military nor systematic.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 84 by obvious Child, posted 12-28-2007 7:36 PM obvious Child has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 88 by obvious Child, posted 12-28-2007 8:02 PM molbiogirl has replied

  
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2664 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 89 of 113 (444279)
12-28-2007 8:04 PM
Reply to: Message 87 by obvious Child
12-28-2007 7:56 PM


Re: Your E-V-I-D-E-N-C-E?
Actually I believe the OP did that, citing off the previous thread. I was just agreeing with him.
I have no idea what you are referring to here.
The ELF premeditated the placing of the spikes, for political reasons, against noncombatant targets by sub-national groups or clandestine agents, usually intended to influence an audience.
Whether or not it actually kills anyone is irrelevant.
Really. By strangling the definition that way, picketing abortion clinics is terrorism.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 87 by obvious Child, posted 12-28-2007 7:56 PM obvious Child has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 91 by obvious Child, posted 12-28-2007 8:18 PM molbiogirl has replied

  
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2664 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 90 of 113 (444281)
12-28-2007 8:08 PM
Reply to: Message 88 by obvious Child
12-28-2007 8:02 PM


Re: Apparently, none of you can answer questions
Those definitions would dictate that many military actions, including Allied efforts in WWII and even the war of independence were terrorist actions (Dresden for example).
Um, Obvious, did you check the cite? That is a definition provided by THE U.S. MARINES.
By that logic, if a million independent people all did that, none of them would be terrorists?
When that day comes, I will consider changing my definition of terrorism.
If a single act of violence were considered "terrorism", then one guy beating the ever lovin crap out of another guy for any political reason whatsoever would qualify as "terrorism".

This message is a reply to:
 Message 88 by obvious Child, posted 12-28-2007 8:02 PM obvious Child has not replied

  
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2664 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 93 of 113 (444313)
12-28-2007 9:26 PM
Reply to: Message 91 by obvious Child
12-28-2007 8:18 PM


Re: Your E-V-I-D-E-N-C-E?
But your definitions are clearly terrible.
They are not my definitions.
If you have a problem with the technical definition of terrorism provided by the U.S. Marines, take it up with them, not me.
If you have a problem with war crimes, take it up with the military, not me.
Still, I like the GS one the best.
terrorism: The unlawful use or threatened use of force or violence against people or property to coerce or intimidate governments or societies, often to achieve political, religious, or ideological objectives. (JCS Pub 1-02)
You missed the point.
Using this definition picketing abortion clinics is terrorism.
And I am still waiting on those cites re: anti abortion wingnuts = terrorists.
You have twice made the claim and twice failed to provide cites.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 91 by obvious Child, posted 12-28-2007 8:18 PM obvious Child has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 94 by obvious Child, posted 12-29-2007 2:00 AM molbiogirl has replied

  
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2664 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 99 of 113 (444500)
12-29-2007 5:14 PM
Reply to: Message 94 by obvious Child
12-29-2007 2:00 AM


Re: Your E-V-I-D-E-N-C-E?
Therefore as long as the protesting does not include threats of violence (and those must be reasonably backed up with capabilities as noted under the limits of free speech), their acts are in no way terroristic.
Again.
The unlawful use or threatened use of force or violence against people or property to coerce or intimidate governments or societies, often to achieve political, religious, or ideological objectives. (JCS Pub 1-02)
You've obviously never walked thru a clinic protest.
As a former Planned Parenthood volunteer, I have.
These folks shout "threats" at the patients as they are escorted into the clinic.
Using your definition, they are terrorists.
Why post a definition if you won't accept it?
Dear. The definition I provided includes violence in its definition too.
In case you've forgotten.
Terrorism: Premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against noncombatant targets by sub-national groups or clandestine agents, usually intended to influence an audience (Title 22 of the United States Code, Section 2656f(d)).
What the hell are you talking about?
Just what I said. War crimes are way OT.
I already cited where I got that ...
Here is the link you provided:
Page not found - National Abortion Federation
The word "terrorist" DOES NOT APPEAR ON THAT PAGE.
Please provide a cite.
... and I didn't even make it.
Oh, yes you did.
Message 78 writes:
Yet oddly, pro-life people who do that are called terrorists.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 94 by obvious Child, posted 12-29-2007 2:00 AM obvious Child has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 105 by obvious Child, posted 12-31-2007 3:49 AM molbiogirl has replied

  
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2664 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 100 of 113 (444505)
12-29-2007 5:29 PM
Reply to: Message 96 by Hyroglyphx
12-29-2007 12:09 PM


Re: Juggs still has a reading problem.
No they aren't.
Prove it.
... then you minimized the other one's (sic)
Yes. I did.
It happened once.
The bombs did not explode.
Terrorism is characterized by a systemic effort.
Were a single act of planting a homemade bomb sufficient to define "domestic terrorism" then this ...
Homemade bomb explodes in Louisiana high school
Amarillo Globe-News
... and hundreds of similar stories are acts of "domestic terrorism".
Its (sic) all about motive.
No. It isn't.
If it were, then anti abortion wingnuts would be called "domestic terrorists".
What would you know about it?
The FBI is a political animal, like any federal bureaucracy.
Political hype is political hype, no matter which way you slice it.
Driving a truck bomb into the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City is domestic terrorism.
Arson is arson.
Maybe they have and you are unaware of it.
Prove it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 96 by Hyroglyphx, posted 12-29-2007 12:09 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2664 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 111 of 113 (444975)
12-31-2007 4:38 PM
Reply to: Message 105 by obvious Child
12-31-2007 3:49 AM


Re: Your E-V-I-D-E-N-C-E?
The link I provided merely cites incidents of arson or crime against abortion clinics.
I provided a link to the crimes committed by anti abortion wingnuts. I also posted those stats.
For your benefit:
Considering that anti abortionist nuts have killed abortion providers and employees...
wiki writes:
In the U.S., violence directed toward abortion providers has killed 7 people, including 3 doctors, 2 clinic employees, a security guard, and a clinic escort.[5]
* March 10, 1993: Dr. David Gunn of Pensacola, Florida was fatally shot during a protest. He had been the subject of wanted-style posters distributed by Operation Rescue in the summer of the year before. Michael F. Griffin was found guilty of Dr. Gunn's murder and was sentenced to life in prison.
* June 29, 1994: Dr. John Britton and James Barrett, a clinic escort, were both shot outside of another facility in Pensacola. Rev. Paul Jennings Hill was charged with the killings, received a death sentence, and was executed September 3, 2003.
* December 30, 1994: Two receptionists, Shannon Lowney and Lee Ann Nichols, were killed in a clinic attack in Brookline, Massachusetts. John Salvi, who prior to his arrest was distributing pamphlets from Human Life International,[6] was arrested and confessed to the killings. He committed suicide in prison and guards found his body under his bed with a plastic garbage bag tied around his head. Salvi had also confessed to a non-lethal attack in Norfolk, Virginia days before the Brookline killings.
* January 29, 1998: Robert Sanderson, an off-duty police officer who worked as a security guard at an abortion clinic in Birmingham, Alabama died when his workplace was bombed. Eric Robert Rudolph, who was also responsible for the 1996 Centennial Olympic Park bombing, was charged with the crime and received two life sentences as a result.
* October 23, 1998: Dr. Barnett Slepian was shot dead at his home in Amherst, New York. His was the last in a series of similar shootings against providers in Canada and northern New York state which were all likely committed by James Kopp. Kopp was convicted of Dr. Slepian's murder after finally being apprehended in France in 2001.
Considering that there is a 30 year history of kidnapping and death threats...
wiki writes:
According to statistics gathered by the National Abortion Federation (NAF), an organization of abortion providers, since 1977 in the United States and Canada, there have been 17 attempted murders, 383 death threats, 153 incidents of assault or battery, and 3 kidnappings committed against abortion providers.[8] The attempted murders were:[9][10][5]
* August 19, 1993: Dr. George Tiller was shot outside of an abortion facility in Wichita, Kansas. Shelley Shannon was charged with the crime and received an 11-year prison sentence.
* June 29, 1994: June Barret was shot in the same attack which claimed the lives of James Barrett, her husband, and Dr. John Britton.
* December 30, 1994: Five individuals were wounded in the same-day shootings which killed Shannon Lowney and Lee Ann Nichols.
* December 18, 1996: Dr. Calvin Jackson of New Orleans, Louisiana was stabbed 15 times, losing 4 pints of blood. Donald Cooper was charged with second-degree attempted murder and sentenced to 20 years.[11]
* October 28, 1997: A physician whose name has not been revealed was shot in his home in Rochester, New York.
* January 29, 1998: Emily Lyons, a nurse, was severely injured in the bombing which also killed Robert Sanderson.
* September 11, 2006 David McMenemy attempted a suicide bombing of a women's clinic in Davenport, Iowa after scouting targets throughout the Midwest. It was later revealed that the targeted clinic did not perform or make referrals for abortions.
Anthrax threats
The first letters claiming to contain anthrax were mailed to U.S. clinics in October 1998, a few days after the Slepian shooting, and since then, there have been a total of 655 such bioterror threats made against abortion providers. None of the "anthrax" in these cases was real.
November 2001: After the genuine 2001 anthrax attacks, Clayton Waagner mailed hoax letters containing a white powder to 554 clinics. Waagner was convicted of 51 charges relating to the anthrax scare on December 3, 2003.
Considering that there is a 30 year history of 91 bombings/arsons...
wiki writes:
According to NAF, since 1977 in the United States and Canada, property crimes committed against abortion providers have included 41 bombings, 173 arsons, 91 attempted bombings or arsons, 619 bomb threats, 1630 incidents of trespassing, 1264 incidents of vandalism, and 100 attacks with butyric acid ("stink bombs").[8] The first clinic arson occurred in Oregon in March 1976 and the first bombing occurred in February 1978 in Ohio.[13] More recent incidents have included:[5]
* October 1999: Martin Uphoff set fire to a Planned Parenthood clinic in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, causing US$100 worth of damage. He was later sentenced to 60 months in prison.
* May 28, 2000: An arson at a clinic in Concord, New Hampshire on resulted in damage estimated at US$20,000.
* October 1, 2000: A Catholic priest drove his car into the Northern Illinois Health Clinic after learning that the FDA had approved the drug RU-486. He pulled out an ax before being shot at by a security guard.
* June 11, 2001: A bombing at a clinic in Tacoma, Washington on destroyed a wall, resulting in US$6000 in damages
* July 4, 2005: A clinic Palm Beach, Florida was the target of an arson.
* December 12, 2005: Patricia Hughes and Jeremy Dunahoe threw a Molotov cocktail at a clinic in Shreveport, Louisiana. The device missed the building and no damage was caused. In August 2006, Hughes was sentenced to six years in prison, and Dunahoe to one year.
* April 25, 2007: A package left at a women's health clinic in Austin, Texas contained an explosive device capable of inflicting serious injury or death. A bomb squad detonated the device. [14]
* May 9, 2007: An unidentified person deliberately set fire to a Planned Parenthood clinic in Virginia Beach, Virginia.[15]
* December 6, 2007: Two unidentified persons set fire to a Planned Parenthood clinic in Albuquerque, New Mexico. [16]
... why do you suppose that the FBI has NOT chosen to call this activity "domestic terrorism"?
The fact remains:
You said anti abortion wingnuts have been called terrorists. Provide a cite or shut up.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 105 by obvious Child, posted 12-31-2007 3:49 AM obvious Child has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024