quote:
WHO DO YOU THINK PUTS THE DATA IN WIKIPEDIA?
Anybody who wants to can edit any entry in Wikipedia.
Anyone at all, regardless of expertise or education or know-how.
From the
Wikipedia home page:
Bold and italicized comments added by me
It [Wikipedia] began as a complement to the expert-written Nupedia on 15 January 2001...
So, Nupedia is expert-written, in contrast to Wikipedia.
Its articles are edited by volunteers in wiki fashion, meaning articles are subject to change by nearly anyone.
See, not only experts or professionals on the subjects do the editing. Just about any person can edit.
...By its open nature, vandalism and inaccuracy are problems in Wikipedia.
I hope you read that closely, Contra.
quote:
According to your principle, getting information from a public resource like a library is implausible, and only word-of-mouth is reliable, yes?
Wikipedia is hardly equivalent to a public library.
When you search for information in a library, you can determine the credentials of the author. This is not possible for Wikepedia, because anyone can be an author.
And I would hardly call the opinion of an Oxford Professor mere "word of mouth". More like "expert opinion".
So, please answer the question, now that you know that non-experts contribute to Wikipedia all the time, so much so that inaccuracy is a problem:
If you needed a liver transplant operation, would you like all the nurses, doctors, anesthesiologists, pharmacists, and all the other people involved in the surgery and your recovery (including the long line of scientists and doctors that came before who developed the techniques, the instruments, and the understanding) to have gotten their education from a Wikipedia-style university, where anyone, no matter the level of expertise, can contribute and teach a class or from a university where every professor is highly educated and an expert in the specific subject they teach?
This message has been edited by schrafinator, 04-25-2005 08:15 AM