Why is Israel getting away with these atrocities?

So it all started when he hit me back huh? There is a difference between taking hostages as bargaining chips and holding prisoners accused of criminal activities. One is a crime and the other is a practice that all civilized nations follow.Israel holds no hostages to the best of my knowledge. It is their stated position that they only have people imprisoned for criminal activities. I'm not saying there's no abuse there mind you, but if Israel were holding hostages like Hezbollah, they would have started lining them up against the wall and shooting them every 15 minutes till the soldiers were returned.

"1. My species will always play nice with you. I will never be aggressive to you. We will make every attempt to cooperate and work with you and everyone in our (global) fish tank.

200 dead is more serious than 2 kidnappings, but is it a misdeed? The Hezbollah border attack, killings and kidnapping were definitely a misdeed, but who are we to tell a sovreign nation that they are not allowed to defend their borders and protect their citizens? The onus falls on Hezbollah this time for initiating the violence and while the Israeli response could become brutally savage in effect, it is still an act of self-defense while their cities are under attack and their soldiers are held captive.

You could have at least made the pretence of responding to my post instead of going off on your American Revolution analogy again. It doesn't hold up and even if it did it makes not a bit of difference.Lebanon and Israel are not in the same situation. They are both sovreign states that were at peace until a faction of one country launched an unprovoked attack on the other. Was kidnapping the 2 soldiers (not to mention killing three others) a misdeed?