Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,839 Year: 4,096/9,624 Month: 967/974 Week: 294/286 Day: 15/40 Hour: 1/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Why is Israel getting away with these atrocities?
RickJB
Member (Idle past 5018 days)
Posts: 917
From: London, UK
Joined: 04-14-2006


Message 3 of 301 (329538)
07-07-2006 6:31 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Brian
07-07-2006 5:19 AM


I totally agree.
Collective punishment is never justified. Israel's actions are terrorism.
However, as soon as a country can afford to support a formal army structure it is able to avoid the term "terrorist" - especially in the news media.
In any case, their recent actions have sent a clear message to angry young Palestinians - for soldier you capture we will kill a dozen civilians.
And they wonder what produces suicide bombers....
Of course Israel has the right as a state to defend itself, but as long as the Palestinians are caged like animals they will continue to bite the hand of their jailer.
Edited by RickJB, : No reason given.
Edited by RickJB, : No reason given.
Edited by RickJB, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Brian, posted 07-07-2006 5:19 AM Brian has not replied

RickJB
Member (Idle past 5018 days)
Posts: 917
From: London, UK
Joined: 04-14-2006


Message 6 of 301 (329561)
07-07-2006 9:21 AM
Reply to: Message 5 by CK
07-07-2006 9:12 AM


riverrat writes:
Didn't Palestine commit an official act of war by kidnapping an Israeli soldier?
Of course, the obvious retort to this is to ask what the Israeli soldier was doing in Palestine!
Still, it's all tit-for-tat in the long run.
The only thing that is certain is that Palestine *must* have their own viable state. Israel's demands for an end to the violence from the Palestinian side as a condition for talks is pointless given that the enitre population is besieged by Israeli forces.
The reason why the Palestinian electorate have turned to a group like Hamas for a government is that they have nothing left to loose.
Fighting is the only freedom they have left.
Edited by RickJB, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by CK, posted 07-07-2006 9:12 AM CK has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 27 by kalimero, posted 07-08-2006 3:16 PM RickJB has not replied

RickJB
Member (Idle past 5018 days)
Posts: 917
From: London, UK
Joined: 04-14-2006


Message 11 of 301 (329656)
07-07-2006 4:23 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by ramoss
07-07-2006 11:07 AM


ramoss writes:
Probably, because government of the palastininans is directly funding suicide bombers going into israel??
But the Israeli government (supported by the west) is funding an army with which to occupy and control Palestine.
In my opinion the diffence is little more than semantic. One man's soldier is another man's terrorist. For many Palstinians Hamas represent THEIR army...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by ramoss, posted 07-07-2006 11:07 AM ramoss has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 13 by ramoss, posted 07-07-2006 8:37 PM RickJB has not replied

RickJB
Member (Idle past 5018 days)
Posts: 917
From: London, UK
Joined: 04-14-2006


Message 23 of 301 (329773)
07-08-2006 2:03 AM
Reply to: Message 12 by ramoss
07-07-2006 8:36 PM


ramoss writes:
Funny how that goes.
Well, if you think about it, it pretty much makes sense - the Palestinian population feel backed into a corner and have voted for a government to fight their cause.
The ablity to fight back (in any way they can) is pretty much the only freedom they have left.
Imagine it from their point of view - if an occupying power built a wall around the US, removed a US citizen's freedom to travel, bulldozed homes in strategic areas, crippled the country's economy and dismantled its army, do you not think that civilian Americans would start fighting back in ANY way they could?
Now let's be clear, I'm not arging moral superiority for either side, I'm just pointing out that it is simply not a case of good guys versus bad guys (as much of the American population seem to see it). Over the years Israel has done just as much to perpetuate the conflict as has Palestine. However, as Israel has a formal army structure, it's actions are afforded undue legitimacy.
We are used to hearing this on the news:
"Israeli soldiers were shot by a Palestinian terrorist."
A palestinain might see it this way:
"Israeli terrorists were shot by a Palestinian soldier."
------------------
Now, look at this site from the BBC.
BBC NEWS | Middle East | Intifada toll 2000-2005
From 2000-2005:
Total Israeli deaths - 950
Total Palestinian deaths - 3223
Seems to me that Israel is MORE than just defending itself....
Edited by RickJB, : No reason given.
Edited by RickJB, : No reason given.
Edited by RickJB, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by ramoss, posted 07-07-2006 8:36 PM ramoss has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 29 by Faith, posted 07-08-2006 3:44 PM RickJB has replied
 Message 30 by kalimero, posted 07-08-2006 3:50 PM RickJB has not replied

RickJB
Member (Idle past 5018 days)
Posts: 917
From: London, UK
Joined: 04-14-2006


Message 51 of 301 (330266)
07-10-2006 8:28 AM
Reply to: Message 29 by Faith
07-08-2006 3:44 PM


faith writes:
Total projection of modern western feelings on them.
No, it's projection of human nature. Palestinians are human beings are they not?
faith writes:
At any time they could have accepted a Palestinian state but their own leaders refused it.
It seems the Temple Mount was a key sticking point. Yes, I thought Arafat waking away like he did was a mistake. His leaving the talks left a political opening for Sharon to tour of the Temple Mount, and to demonstrate his own rejection for Barak's position. The Palestinian demonstrations that followed were clearly the spark for the current intifada.
faith writes:
They behave rationally to serve reasonable objectives while Palestinian suicide bombers are serving an irrational idea and targeting innocent civilians.
I won't argue for a second that the suicide-bombing tactic was/is justified. It has seriously hurt the Palestinian cause. But from a Palestinian point of view, when one has a God but lacks jets, tanks and rockets it might seem like a "rational" way to fight back - clearly it isn't, no argument.
faith writes:
How many of the Palestinians were terrorist activists and how many Israelis mere citizens minding their own business when they were murdered?
Doesn't the lack of clarity on this point tell you something? The true extent of Hamas and other groups is indeed blended into the population at large - they represent a civilian-based resistance. When Israel strikes back it inevitably ends up targeting civilians...
But let me be clear in this - I have sympathy for both sides of the argument. I have no desire to represent the situation as a good guy/bad guy scenario.
However, I do feel that in this instance Israel is needlessly escalating the entire conflict for the sake of ONE prisoner. No "rational" military tactician would ever suggest such a thing.
Edited by RickJB, : No reason given.
Edited by RickJB, : No reason given.
Edited by RickJB, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 29 by Faith, posted 07-08-2006 3:44 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 53 by Buzsaw, posted 07-10-2006 8:46 AM RickJB has replied
 Message 55 by Faith, posted 07-10-2006 10:41 AM RickJB has replied

RickJB
Member (Idle past 5018 days)
Posts: 917
From: London, UK
Joined: 04-14-2006


Message 54 of 301 (330313)
07-10-2006 10:32 AM
Reply to: Message 53 by Buzsaw
07-10-2006 8:46 AM


buz writes:
Palestinian government and religious leaders would stop indoctrinating Jihadists from kindegarten on up to be terrorists and cease from encouraging and supporting terrorism, the killing would stop from both directions, with the jets, tanks and rockets parked in their warehouses and hangers.
You have omitted the fact that religious extremism been fuelled (on both sides, I might add) in response to the conflict.
We have a feedback loop, so to speak.
Edited by RickJB, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 53 by Buzsaw, posted 07-10-2006 8:46 AM Buzsaw has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 56 by Faith, posted 07-10-2006 10:44 AM RickJB has not replied

RickJB
Member (Idle past 5018 days)
Posts: 917
From: London, UK
Joined: 04-14-2006


Message 60 of 301 (330447)
07-10-2006 2:34 PM
Reply to: Message 55 by Faith
07-10-2006 10:41 AM


faith writes:
If it really were just human nature there would be no argument. But you, as so many do, completely overlook the factor of ideology, which is why projecting your human feelings onto the Palestinian situation doesn't work.
What can be MORE human than ideology?
Isn't your own Christian ideology a big part of how you view and live your life? Doesn't it play a large part in how you relate to other people?
faith writes:
The whole Palestinian position against Israel is ideological.
As is your position against the Palestinians!
Round and round the circle goes, just like the conflict....
Edited by RickJB, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 55 by Faith, posted 07-10-2006 10:41 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 61 by Faith, posted 07-10-2006 3:11 PM RickJB has replied

RickJB
Member (Idle past 5018 days)
Posts: 917
From: London, UK
Joined: 04-14-2006


Message 76 of 301 (330692)
07-11-2006 1:34 AM
Reply to: Message 61 by Faith
07-10-2006 3:11 PM


faith writes:
Comparing an ideology to human feelings about who is doing what to whom is bogus!
How exactly? Where do you think ideology comes from? What do you think ideology is?
Heritage Dictionary writes:
Ideology
1. The body of ideas reflecting the social needs and aspirations of an individual, group, class, or culture.
2. A set of doctrines or beliefs that form the basis of a political, economic, or other system.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 61 by Faith, posted 07-10-2006 3:11 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 81 by Faith, posted 07-11-2006 2:49 PM RickJB has replied

RickJB
Member (Idle past 5018 days)
Posts: 917
From: London, UK
Joined: 04-14-2006


Message 84 of 301 (330859)
07-11-2006 3:14 PM
Reply to: Message 81 by Faith
07-11-2006 2:49 PM


Faith,
faith writes:
I was answering that the situation is not defined by such feelings, but by "ideology" by which I mean an *artificial* -- NOT natural -- official explanation of the situation.....Marxism is an ideology in that sense, for instance, an artificial construct of what society should be.
Marxism was influenced by the grinding poverty and the rigid class systems Marx saw in capitalist Western Europe during the 19th century!
Ideology arises from human experience. Where else would it come from?
Now, given that all ideologies represent:
1. A body of ideas reflecting the social needs and aspirations of an individual, group, class, or culture,
2. A set of doctrines or beliefs that form the basis of a political, economic, or other system,
your ideas of "artficiality" seem somewhat arbitrary. Is Christianity a "natural" ideology?
I ask because I can see you've already begun to skew this over into a critique of Islam. Perhaps your OWN form of Christian ideology drives you to do this...
Edited by RickJB, : No reason given.
Edited by RickJB, : No reason given.
Edited by RickJB, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 81 by Faith, posted 07-11-2006 2:49 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 86 by Faith, posted 07-11-2006 3:45 PM RickJB has replied

RickJB
Member (Idle past 5018 days)
Posts: 917
From: London, UK
Joined: 04-14-2006


Message 94 of 301 (330903)
07-11-2006 5:21 PM
Reply to: Message 86 by Faith
07-11-2006 3:45 PM


Well you've made your position very clear, Faith.
Though I disagree, I see no point in arguing this any further.
Edited by RickJB, : No reason given.
Edited by RickJB, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 86 by Faith, posted 07-11-2006 3:45 PM Faith has not replied

RickJB
Member (Idle past 5018 days)
Posts: 917
From: London, UK
Joined: 04-14-2006


Message 205 of 301 (332565)
07-17-2006 2:37 PM


Regarding the Islam = Terrorism argument..
It is worth noting that until around 2000 the leading users of suicide-bombing tactics were the Tamils of Sri Lanka - mostly Hindus.
Edited by RickJB, : No reason given.

Replies to this message:
 Message 206 by Faith, posted 07-17-2006 2:39 PM RickJB has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024