|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
Member (Idle past 5190 days) Posts: 649 From: Melbourne, Australia Joined: |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Transexuals and Marriage: A Question | |||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2198 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: Can you please list some specificexamples of marriage being "trashed" if gay people are permitted to marry? You have made many shrill, yet vague, predictions of doom if gay people are allowed to marry, yet you have never had the balls to actually say what you think will befall the nation and the world should this come to pass. So, tell us, Faith. What exactly do you see happening that will be the ruin of us all?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
crashfrog Member (Idle past 1495 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: |
WHY SHOULD TWO MEN HAVE ANY RIGHTS TOGETHER OVER AND ABOVE WHAT SINGLE MEN OR WOMEN HAVE JUST BECAUSE OF THEIR SEXUAL ABERRATION? Because there's two of them. I mean, duh!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
crashfrog Member (Idle past 1495 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: |
Let laws be changed if necessary so that a person may have whomever they want with them in the hospital Sure. The quickest, fastest way to do that is to allow homosexual couples to marry. And there's a bunch of other benefits, too. Rather than change 1000 laws, why not change just one?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
DBlevins Member (Idle past 3804 days) Posts: 652 From: Puyallup, WA. Joined: |
I am not claiming such thing. I said that if you look at human history you'd see that for the most part marriage had always been purely for procreation reasons. In modern times, we've seen many changes in society that we didn't see before, but the word/concept of marriage remained the same. Gay marriage, for example, is an entirely new concept. Throughout human history marriage between those of the same sex has been a normal part of the cultural and social institution of marriage. It is actually those of the Christian right who propose redefnining marriage to mean ONLY between a man and woman. Same sex marriage is NOT a new concept. It's been around for thousands of years at least.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1472 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
You keep claiming that same sex marriage has been known throughout history but what you offered for proof a while back for the most part showed "liaisons" and temporary connections, not marriage, and certainly very RARE occurrences, most culture-specific, in any case.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given. Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
rgb Inactive Member |
Even the ancient Greeks, as liberal as they were in regard to same sex relationships, only thought of marriage as a "thing" between people of opposite sex. Ancient Romans were another example.
Yes, throughout history same sex relationships had been very common, but they still thought of marriage as something between men and women.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2198 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: Even if what you claim is true, are you then saying that no culture is ever allowed to change it's rules regarding marriage?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
crashfrog Member (Idle past 1495 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: |
Even the ancient Greeks, as liberal as they were in regard to same sex relationships, only thought of marriage as a "thing" between people of opposite sex. Well, that's one culture that didn't have gay marriage. You've got about 1,000,000 more to go to substantiate that no culture had gay marriage.
Ancient Romans were another example. That's two. 999,999 more to go. Better get crackin'!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
DBlevins Member (Idle past 3804 days) Posts: 652 From: Puyallup, WA. Joined: |
You keep claiming that same sex marriage has been known throughout history but what you offered for proof a while back for the most part showed "liaisons" and temporary connections, not marriage, and certainly very RARE occurrences, most culture-specific, in any case. No. You're wrong on all counts. I did provide evidence which you obviously didn't bother to read through. And it is obvious from the readings that homosexual marriage is not a RARE occurence, but is fundemental, universal, and historic. Here is another article in wikipedia which distinctly says "marriage" and not just unions. {ABE: The one I referenced before is at the end of this post}
Wikipedia Of course, if you did a bit of research you would find that same-sex marriage exists and has existed throughout the world. From the following website:
Same-sex MARRIAGE article quote: quote: Article reference: Joseph M. Carrier and Stephen O. Murray, "Woman-woman marriage in Africa", Boy-wives and Female Husbands: Studies of African Homosexualities, ed. Stephen O. Murray and Will Roscoe, p255-257
quote: Article reference: Joseph M. Carrier and Stephen O. Murray, "Woman-woman marriage in Africa", Boy-wives and Female Husbands: Studies of African Homosexualities, ed. Stephen O. Murray and Will Roscoe, p27
quote: Article reference: Roscoe, Changing Ones: Third and Fourth Genders in Native North America, p140-141
quote: Article reference: http://www.china-stemmata.com/CTFS/JLQ.htm
quote: Article reference: Bret Hinsch, Passions of the Cut Sleeve: The Male Homosexual Tradition in China, p132 And if you have an desire to look further into the subject and educate yourself you might try the wikipedia article I referenced before (scroll down a bit to get to the meat of the issue: Wiki Edited by DBlevins, : Added reference to previous article posted.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1472 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
I do not want to read through another "History of Sexuality" site. thanks anyway. You give no dates, no statistics, just a few anecdotal-type references to VERY FEW VERY MINOR small tribes without bothering with incidence or percentages, yet you are calling this some kind of big deal throughout history. You don't discuss cultural context, whether it's even about homosexuality -- I can't tell from the quotes you give. And I'm sure this comes from the pro-gay literature too. No, I will not research it. You've proved nothing and that's your job, not mine.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
DBlevins Member (Idle past 3804 days) Posts: 652 From: Puyallup, WA. Joined: |
See my reply to Faith:
here
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
rgb Inactive Member |
crashfrog writes
quote:Ok crashfrog, I give up. Now it's your turn to give the other 99999... example of cultures that accepted marriage between people of the same sex.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
crashfrog Member (Idle past 1495 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined: |
Now it's your turn to give the other 99999... example of cultures that accepted marriage between people of the same sex. Maybe you're not too clear on logic? To rebut that assertion that something never happens, all I need is 1 example. Luckily, DBlevins has already provided several.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
rgb Inactive Member |
See Faith's post right above yours.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
rgb Inactive Member |
crashfrog writes
quote:Maybe not, but please point out where I said same sex marriage had never happenned in history. If I did, I'm sorry for the misunderstanding. I meant to say that throughout human history the cultures that did not accept same sex marriage overwhelmingly outnumber those that did, and that's an understatement. The few examples of same sex marriage accepting societies were very small isolated cultures that's been extinct for a long time now.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024