Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,755 Year: 4,012/9,624 Month: 883/974 Week: 210/286 Day: 17/109 Hour: 1/5


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Let's discuss Bill O'Reilly
Granny Magda
Member
Posts: 2462
From: UK
Joined: 11-12-2007
Member Rating: 3.8


Message 54 of 95 (466500)
05-15-2008 11:01 AM


Belligerent Bill
I have no idea why anyone agrees to be "interviewed" by O'Reilly. He is rude, belligerent and pig ignorant. His interviewing style consists of no more than shouting the other person down, talking over them, taking mock umbrage at anything they say and constantly changing the subject whenever his interviewee makes a point. He also um's err's and slputters a lot, which wastes a lot of the time that interviewees might otherwise use to show just how ridiculous O'Reilly's arguments are. The interviews are often too short to have any real substance to them anyway.
Just take a look at this well-known clip, where O'Reilly "interviews" one Jeremy Glick, whose father was killed in the 9/11 attacks. Glick has had the temerity to disagree with war in Afghanistan, much to Bill's disgust. O'Reilly just shouts and splutters at Glick, like a child having a temper tantrum, until eventually he eventually has Glick's mike cut off.
What really strikes me as objectionable here, other than the general rudeness and un-professionalism, is that O'Reilly seems to think that he knows what the deceased Mr Glick senior would have wanted, better apparently than the guy's own son. Bill's loud-mouthed bullying of this young man is apparently what the father would have wanted. How insulting!
It seems to me that the reason why O'Reilly gets so hot under the collar here (apart from mock-shock showmanship)is that he would like to have a monopoly on what the 9/11 victims "would have wanted", so that he can invoke their memory to justify whatever comes into his head. I hardly need point out how pathetic and fallacious this is.
Of course, when someone Bill approves of appears on the show, he practically falls on his knees to blow them...
Fair and balanced eh?

Mutate and Survive

  
Granny Magda
Member
Posts: 2462
From: UK
Joined: 11-12-2007
Member Rating: 3.8


Message 65 of 95 (466615)
05-15-2008 10:12 PM
Reply to: Message 63 by IamJoseph
05-15-2008 9:50 PM


Islamophobe's Wet Dream
Its getting even a sadder situation in UK-stan. One day, the likes of Brits will never be allowed on UK-stan TV.
Wow, what in-depth political insights. What the bloody hell do you know about what's happening in the UK? UK-Stan? What piffle. For your information, Muslims account for a terrifying 2.8% of the UK population. They are hardly poised to take over.
This is just another of your apocalyptic wet dreams, with Muslims cast as the bogeyman, as usual. Not everyone is as pants-pissingly scared of Muslims as you IaJ. Scaremongering crap like this actually does the job of the tiny number of terrorists for them.
Keep it up, I'm sure that any ridiculous radical Islamist would be delighted to hear you talk like this.

Mutate and Survive

This message is a reply to:
 Message 63 by IamJoseph, posted 05-15-2008 9:50 PM IamJoseph has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 66 by IamJoseph, posted 05-15-2008 10:20 PM Granny Magda has replied

  
Granny Magda
Member
Posts: 2462
From: UK
Joined: 11-12-2007
Member Rating: 3.8


Message 74 of 95 (466678)
05-16-2008 9:54 AM
Reply to: Message 66 by IamJoseph
05-15-2008 10:20 PM


Re: Islamophobe's Wet Dream
How many Brits have been allowed to immigrate to Islamic states?
Irrelevant.
How many chruches in UK as opposed Iran and Mecca?
Oh more certainly. How else would we be able to turn them into luxury flats and nightclubs when no-one can be bothered to turn out to worship any more.
Just down the road from my home there is a synagogue. It is about fifty metres from a mosque, directly opposite a Catholic social club, about fifty metres from a Hindu temple, which is itself about fifty meters away from a protestant church.
I consider that such plurality is a good thing. Only you could interpret it as a sign of impending doom.
The term UK-stan is hardly my innovation, but adapted from British authors, including books such as LONDONISTAN.
Melanie Phillips, the author in question, is a bigoted racist moron. I'm sure the two of you would get along famously. None of this makes her ridiculous alarmist nonsense worth listening to.
2.8% of terror can do worse than 80% of non-terror populations.
If this sentence were written in English, I would be able to respond to it.
UK has bowed to allowing sharia to rule its institutions
Retarded bullshit. This is completely false. Why do you insist on being so incredibly wrong all the time?
Reciprocity must rule.
An eye for an eye eh? You've been listening to your sick monster of an Old Testament god for too long. We are a damn sight more civilised than that over here.

Mutate and Survive

This message is a reply to:
 Message 66 by IamJoseph, posted 05-15-2008 10:20 PM IamJoseph has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 77 by IamJoseph, posted 05-16-2008 10:57 AM Granny Magda has replied

  
Granny Magda
Member
Posts: 2462
From: UK
Joined: 11-12-2007
Member Rating: 3.8


Message 79 of 95 (466701)
05-16-2008 11:24 AM
Reply to: Message 77 by IamJoseph
05-16-2008 10:57 AM


Re: Islamophobe's Wet Dream
I agree. Even more so when there is reciprocity. How many churches in Mecca?
So just to get this straight, the lack of plurality in Mecca is a bad thing and we in Britain should react to this by being just as bad. Forgive me if I aspire to rather higher standards.
I am not going to get dragged into an analysis of the UK media with you IaJ. That would require that you actually have some command of the subject. Inane statements such as;
The UK media and its journalists are akin to al jazeera, and have lost numerous court actions
prove that you are unable to participate in an adult discussion.
I am not going to continue this discussion with you because;
a) This is all off topic. It has nothing to do with Bill O'Reilly beyond general Islamophobic bigotry.
b) I do not have infinite time to waste on you. Even if I did, we would only get into a pointless argument about whether my infinite life had a beginning or not.
Why not stick to your "Talking Balls" thread?

Mutate and Survive

This message is a reply to:
 Message 77 by IamJoseph, posted 05-16-2008 10:57 AM IamJoseph has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024