Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,742 Year: 3,999/9,624 Month: 870/974 Week: 197/286 Day: 4/109 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Defining Unconditional love
Taz
Member (Idle past 3317 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 16 of 104 (448099)
01-11-2008 11:12 PM
Reply to: Message 14 by pelican
01-11-2008 9:27 PM


Re: Don't have to be good to be loved?
Heinrik writes:
Does unconditional love contain no pain and no suffering? Isn't it part of the true nature of unconditional love to hurt sometimes in either the giving or recieving?
But throwing your children into the pit of hell for all eternity? That's anything but unconditional love.
Look, I'd rather not exist at all then be tortured for a very very long time.
Here is another way you can look at it. My wife and I are on an island. We decide to beget a child and love it unconditionally. When the child is 10, we tell him, "don't ever go to the other side of the island or I will beat the crap out of you." He goes to the other side of the island. I tie him up and start whipping him until he passes out. I wait for him to recover and whip him some more. Everyday, I'd whip him until he passes out. I do this until he turns 20.
Does that sound like unconditional love to you?
Remember that god is all knowing and all powerful. He knew that at age 20 I was going to turn into an atheist. So, he allowed me to enter this world simply to throw me into hell for all eternity. Does that sound like an all loving father figure to you? If it does, I'm sorry but you need help.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by pelican, posted 01-11-2008 9:27 PM pelican has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by pelican, posted 01-12-2008 5:59 AM Taz has replied

  
pelican
Member (Idle past 5011 days)
Posts: 781
From: australia
Joined: 05-27-2007


Message 17 of 104 (448119)
01-12-2008 5:59 AM
Reply to: Message 16 by Taz
01-11-2008 11:12 PM


Re: Don't have to be good to be loved?
jesus, your post reads like a horror story. How many believers in god actually did sacrifce their children in god's name? In loving god unconditionally pain was definately present. More for some.
Taz, I understand the opposite of unconditional love as you describe. It's a bit over the top, isn't it? I wasn't alluding to so much pain, just the normal associated with giving unconditional love in todays society.
So now we know what it is not, can you tell us what it is?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by Taz, posted 01-11-2008 11:12 PM Taz has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 18 by Taz, posted 01-12-2008 11:02 AM pelican has replied

  
Taz
Member (Idle past 3317 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 18 of 104 (448179)
01-12-2008 11:02 AM
Reply to: Message 17 by pelican
01-12-2008 5:59 AM


Re: Don't have to be good to be loved?
Heinrik writes:
jesus, your post reads like a horror story. How many believers in god actually did sacrifce their children in god's name? In loving god unconditionally pain was definately present. More for some.
How many believers you know actually believe in an eternal hell for atheists like myself and for believers of other religions?
Taz, I understand the opposite of unconditional love as you describe. It's a bit over the top, isn't it? I wasn't alluding to so much pain, just the normal associated with giving unconditional love in todays society.
And you're missing the point.
(A) God is all knowing.
(B) God loves me unconditionally.
(C) God knew that I was going to turn atheist at the age of 20.
(D) According to christians, I owe my existence to god.
(E) God specifically created me so I could exist in hell for all eternity after I'm dead.
Again, does that make sense to you? Would an all loving father figure who loves his children unconditionally torture his children for all eternity if they don't listen to him, especially when he knew before they even existed that he would have to cast them down to hell regardless?
So now we know what it is not, can you tell us what it is?
Sure, go back and undo existence or redo it without a hell and eternal damnation.
Going back to first quote.
How many believers in god actually did sacrifce their children in god's name?
When I was in sociology in college a million years ago, we studied some of the worst child abuse cases in history of the country. (I just found it interesting that almost all of them involved religious parents.) There was one case in particular that caught my eyes right away. A retarded teenager was raped and got pregnant. Her parents made her put the resulting child in the barn without any parental love. The teen was allowed to feed the child several times a day and then put it back in the barn. This went on until the child was 6 when someone noticed this and alerted the authority.
The child grew up without any social interaction whatsoever. Psychologists were intrigued because the child had no idea how to react to things like pain, meaning he didn't even cry out when he's hurt.
Oh, and did I mention that the teen's parents claimed they did that because they "loved" their daughter and grandkid? Abortion was out of the question because of their religion, and the kid was a result from rape so it didn't deserve to live with the family. Sounds like a classic case of christian hell to me.
I'm not saying all christians are like this. I'm saying this is a real live demonstration of what the true christian idea of an all loving parent figure with a hell on the side. Do you or do you not agree that the teen parents loved their daughter and grandson unconditionally like they claimed?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by pelican, posted 01-12-2008 5:59 AM pelican has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by bluescat48, posted 01-12-2008 11:50 AM Taz has not replied
 Message 20 by Phat, posted 01-12-2008 11:55 AM Taz has replied
 Message 31 by pelican, posted 01-12-2008 6:10 PM Taz has replied
 Message 38 by ICANT, posted 01-13-2008 5:25 PM Taz has not replied
 Message 43 by ICANT, posted 01-13-2008 10:47 PM Taz has replied

  
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4215 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 19 of 104 (448187)
01-12-2008 11:50 AM
Reply to: Message 18 by Taz
01-12-2008 11:02 AM


Re: Don't have to be good to be loved?
Taz
And you're missing the point.
(A) God is all knowing.
(B) God loves me unconditionally.
(C) God knew that I was going to turn atheist at the age of 20.
(D) According to christians, I owe my existence to god.
(E) God specifically created me so I could exist in hell for all eternity after I'm dead.
Again, does that make sense to you? Would an all loving father figure who loves his children unconditionally torture his children for all eternity if they don't listen to him, especially when he knew before they even existed that he would have to cast them down to hell regardless?
It makes NO! sense to me at all.

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by Taz, posted 01-12-2008 11:02 AM Taz has not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18332
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 20 of 104 (448190)
01-12-2008 11:55 AM
Reply to: Message 18 by Taz
01-12-2008 11:02 AM


Foreknowledge and Eternal Torment
Allow me to enter the discussion for a moment. )I'm practicing this argument in my head, so bear with me as I attempt to reconstruct it here )
My Point:
Assuming for a moment that there are two spirits.
1) The One who is, always was, and always will be and
2) The one who was, is not and yet will come.
See...the problem is, we are not only trying to place all of the responsibility and blame on God for eternally being in charge of this stuff, we are attempting to foreknow the future.
Lets go back over your points and allow me to comment:
Taz writes:
(A) God is all knowing.
Phat writes:
Sounds reasonable.
(B) God loves me unconditionally.
Phat writes:
Yes. He loves me unconditionally but will only commune with me conditionally. This is the gray area we need further to discuss. IOW if there were no Hell, all of Gods blessed chillin would be in communion...even Hitler, even the xe Murderer and John Wayne Gacy. Does that make sense?
(C) God knew that I was going to turn atheist at the age of 20.
Phat writes:
What you did at age 20 is irrelevant. All that matters is your thought process at this moment in time. Remember my quote mines from the good book? One flow was, is and will be. The other flow was, is not and yet will come. Assuming a degree of literalness, the present moment is a clear black/white issue. There is no gray.
(D) According to Christians, I owe my existence to god.
Phat writes:
seems reasonable, if He exists...right?
(E) God specifically created me so I could exist in hell for all eternity after I'm dead.
We are only responsible for our present moment. The past is past and the future is not our problem except in regards to our present behaviors and decisions.
Edited by Phat, : fixed quote
Edited by Phat, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by Taz, posted 01-12-2008 11:02 AM Taz has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 21 by Taz, posted 01-12-2008 12:27 PM Phat has replied

  
Taz
Member (Idle past 3317 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 21 of 104 (448199)
01-12-2008 12:27 PM
Reply to: Message 20 by Phat
01-12-2008 11:55 AM


Re: Foreknowledge and Eternal Torment
Phat writes:
Yes. He loves me unconditionally but will only commune with me conditionally. This is the gray area we need further to discuss. IOW if there were no Hell, all of Gods blessed chillin would be in communion...even Hitler, even the xe Murderer and John Wayne Gacy. Does that make sense?
Ok, so god loved everyone unconditionally so much that he created Hitler just so Hitler could torture and kill millions and millions of people just so Hitler could go to hell for all eternity. Phat, in order for you to solve one stumbling block you created yourself a kazillion others.
What you did at age 20 is irrelevant. All that matters is your thought process at this moment in time. Remember my quote mines from the good book? One flow was, is and will be. The other flow was, is not and yet will come. Assuming a degree of literalness, the present moment is a clear black/white issue. There is no gray.
Ok, mumble jumble aside, address the issue directly please. Is god all knowing or not? If so, then he knew I was going to turn atheist and thus will go to the christian hell. If he didn't, then he's not god and we need not worry.
We are only responsible for our present moment. The past is past and the future is not our problem except in regards to our present behaviors and decisions.
Gee, you didn't address my issue at all.
Christian doctrine specifically says that everyone is damned from the start, and it is only accepting Jesus Christ as one's personal savior will one be spared of eternal damnation.
The fact remains that I'm an atheist. I turned atheist when I was about 20. If god was all knowing, he would have known that I would have turned into an atheist and thus be damned. He created me anyway.
At this point, I only see 3 possible choices.
(1) God is all knowing, he created me anyway just so I could go to hell, and thus he does not love me unconditionally.
(2) God is not all knowing, he didn't know I was going to turn atheist, and thus he is not really god.
(3) God is all knowing, he created me knowing I would reject him when I turned 20, he loves me me unconditionally, and so there is no hell.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by Phat, posted 01-12-2008 11:55 AM Phat has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 23 by Phat, posted 01-12-2008 12:37 PM Taz has replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 22 of 104 (448200)
01-12-2008 12:31 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by pelican
01-11-2008 10:17 PM


Re: loving unconditionally no matter what
I agree with the definition you give in this example of loving a friend unconditionally, no matter what. However, what if the 'no matter what' was hurting you? Would you still be able to help and support your friend, as this definition of unconditional love would require you to do so?
I think what Jesus was saying was that it is most virtuous to love everyone, even your enemies. He goes on to say, if you only love those who love you, what reward will you have? Do not even pagans do this?
So we have to find out what the word "love" here means. Does loving someone mean doting on them, hand and foot, becoming their servant for all of time no matter if they treat you poorly or not?
No. It means to treat them with the Golden Rule, even your enemies. The crux of it is that we are not equipped to complete the task with perfection. But the closer we are to that perfect goal of loving others the way God loves us, the better off we are, and the more receptive of God we become.
I tried for a long time with a partner. I forgave and understood but after 26yrs, I could not do it any longer. I didn't blame my partner and my partner no way wanted me to leave. Neither did I, but it was destroying me. I had to walk to save myself. This is why I believe loving another unconditionally can be a burden. Do I still love this person unconditionally? Obviously not. I don't want this person in my life again without a radical change in their behaviour. Sorry but true.
I don't think you have to stop loving a person even when they wrong you. In Christian terms, you would still care for that person, be in prayer for that person, and wish them the best. But you are not supposed to be shackled to a completely abusive person as a personal mandate from God. Think about it: If Jesus wanted you to love every one in the same exact capacity, then you would be married to the entire world. Obviously, that is not the case. And all over the Bible is says to choose your mate's carefully so as to avoid these trials.
What it means to love someone is to not to harbor a spirit of animosity, be forgiving to others who wrong you(forgiveness does not mean that you don't have to suffer consequences for your actions, or is a free ticket to be an ass your whole life), and to try and sow peace where there is discord.
I wonder if Jesus did love unconditionally no matter what? Did he 'not accept' some and 'accepted' others? He hand picked his immediate followers, all male may I add. Doesn't unconditional love contain equality and no favouritism? Just a thought.
Love in many ways is conditional. The unconditional love means treating people the way you would have them treat you. It doesn't mean you have to suffer a lifetime with someone who doesn't treat you the way you would treat them.
Its like a murderer. He may be truly sorry for what he has done. And this is a good thing for his own conscience. And he may be absolved by God if he sincerely means it. But these are eternally difficult questions to answer because we are not able to give that absolution. All we can do is to forgive them. But forgiveness does not necessarily mean that they are to be exonerated for their crime.
A man who engages in some sexual sin can and will be forgiven for his sin for evermore even though he may have to carry a token of that sin in his flesh. There are consequences for our actions. We may have to pay temporal consequences even if we are forgiven.
If you receive a loan from a lender and you later realize that you made a mistake, you can be forgiven for making a hasty decision. But you still owe that person or institution. Until you pay your debt, you are not free of that consequence.
These are eternally difficult questions that we grapple with. Sometimes there is no easy answer, nor will the answer always come easily. But if we follow the Golden Rule, can we really go wrong? And isn't is maddening that something so simple in concept can be one of the hardest things to achieve?

“First dentistry was painless, then bicycles were chainless, and carriages were horseless, and many laws enforceless. Next cookery was fireless, telegraphy was wireless, cigars were nicotineless, and coffee caffeineless. Soon oranges were seedless, the putting green was weedless, the college boy was hatless, the proper diet -- fatless. New motor roads are dustless, the latest steel is rustless, our tennis courts are sodless, our new religion -- Godless” -Arthur Guiterman

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by pelican, posted 01-11-2008 10:17 PM pelican has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 32 by pelican, posted 01-12-2008 7:26 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18332
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 23 of 104 (448201)
01-12-2008 12:37 PM
Reply to: Message 21 by Taz
01-12-2008 12:27 PM


Is Monty Hall at the Gates Of Heaven?
Taz writes:
Ok, mumble jumble aside, address the issue directly please. Is god all knowing or not? If so, then he knew I was going to turn atheist and thus will go to the christian hell. If he didn't, then he's not god and we need not worry.
How would I ever know if God was all knowing or not?
Taz writes:
Christian doctrine specifically says that everyone is damned from the start, and it is only accepting Jesus Christ as one's personal savior will one be spared of eternal damnation.
Not all Christian doctrine says this.
Taz writes:
The fact remains that I'm an atheist.
Good. We cleared up the present moment, at any rate.
Taz writes:
At this point, I only see 3 possible choices.
(1) God is all knowing, he created me anyway just so I could go to hell, and thus he does not love me unconditionally.
(2) God is not all knowing, he didn't know I was going to turn atheist, and thus he is not really god.
(3) God is all knowing, he created me knowing I would reject him when I turned 20, he loves me me unconditionally, and so there is no hell.
Lets analyze your conclusions.
(1) ...God does not love me unconditionally (IF He exists)
(2) God is clueless and thus a phony.
(3) God loves me unconditionally and thus there is no Hell.
I would go with # 3. Hell only exists for those who reject reality.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by Taz, posted 01-12-2008 12:27 PM Taz has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 24 by Taz, posted 01-12-2008 12:53 PM Phat has replied

  
Taz
Member (Idle past 3317 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 24 of 104 (448206)
01-12-2008 12:53 PM
Reply to: Message 23 by Phat
01-12-2008 12:37 PM


Re: Is Monty Hall at the Gates Of Heaven?
Phat writes:
How would I ever know if God was all knowing or not?
Christianiy claims to have the monopoly on truth. You're a christian.
moi writes:
Christian doctrine specifically says that everyone is damned from the start, and it is only accepting Jesus Christ as one's personal savior will one be spared of eternal damnation.
Not all Christian doctrine says this.
Huh? I've attended dozens of churches... Ok, let's take another approach.
Do you or do you not believe that everyone is born with the "original" sin and that through baptism one is absorbed of this sin? If you do believe this, then how is this different than being saved only by accepting Jesus Christ as your personal savior? If you don't believe this, then what is the point of christianity? Can't we all just live and not bother with religion?
I would go with # 3. Hell only exists for those who reject reality.
Ok, so you don't believe in hell. What happens to all the bad people after they die, according to your christian belief?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by Phat, posted 01-12-2008 12:37 PM Phat has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 25 by Phat, posted 01-12-2008 1:10 PM Taz has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18332
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 25 of 104 (448208)
01-12-2008 1:10 PM
Reply to: Message 24 by Taz
01-12-2008 12:53 PM


Re: Is Monty Hall at the Gates Of Heaven?
Taz writes:
Do you or do you not believe that everyone is born with the "original" sin and that through baptism one is absorbed of this sin? If you do believe this, then how is this different than being saved only by accepting Jesus Christ as your personal savior?
To me, accepting Jesus Christ means accepting GOD as knowable. This allows for further prayer, meditation, and reflection in communion. People find it harder to commune with an unknowable God.
As far as Original Sin goes, I'm not sure at this point.
Taz writes:
What happens to all the bad people after they die, according to your Christian belief?
First of all, what by definition is a bad person? Is atheist Taz any worse than Christian phat? Furthermore, is child molester John Wayne Gacy any worse than the Pope? (Or some of the Catholic Priests) or Hitler? Or our Mothers?
Again...as I say...Hell is only found after a rejection of reality.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by Taz, posted 01-12-2008 12:53 PM Taz has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 26 by Taz, posted 01-12-2008 1:14 PM Phat has replied

  
Taz
Member (Idle past 3317 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 26 of 104 (448210)
01-12-2008 1:14 PM
Reply to: Message 25 by Phat
01-12-2008 1:10 PM


Re: Is Monty Hall at the Gates Of Heaven?
Phat writes:
First of all, what by definition is a bad person?
Let's cut through all the nitpickings. What happens to people like Hitler after they die?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by Phat, posted 01-12-2008 1:10 PM Phat has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 27 by Phat, posted 01-12-2008 4:37 PM Taz has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18332
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 27 of 104 (448230)
01-12-2008 4:37 PM
Reply to: Message 26 by Taz
01-12-2008 1:14 PM


Re: Is Monty Hall at the Gates Of Heaven?
Taz writes:
What happens to people like Hitler after they die?
Several possibilities.
1) They die, cease to exist, and turn to worm food.
2) They die, are judged by the decisions made in their lives, extenuating circumstances (like childhood abuse or mental illness) and judged based on their reaction to meeting Jesus face to face.
3) They die, their soulish essence is drawn into communion with other soulish essences, and a new form of intelligence emerges.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by Taz, posted 01-12-2008 1:14 PM Taz has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 28 by Taz, posted 01-12-2008 4:57 PM Phat has replied

  
Taz
Member (Idle past 3317 days)
Posts: 5069
From: Zerus
Joined: 07-18-2006


Message 28 of 104 (448235)
01-12-2008 4:57 PM
Reply to: Message 27 by Phat
01-12-2008 4:37 PM


Re: Is Monty Hall at the Gates Of Heaven?
I just love answers that are nonanswers. Actually, I don't.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by Phat, posted 01-12-2008 4:37 PM Phat has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 29 by Phat, posted 01-12-2008 5:02 PM Taz has not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18332
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 29 of 104 (448237)
01-12-2008 5:02 PM
Reply to: Message 28 by Taz
01-12-2008 4:57 PM


Re: Is Monty Hall at the Gates Of Heaven?
Taz writes:
I just love answers that are nonanswers.
But you are asking me questions that I can't possibly answer.
That must have been your problem with God, too. You never heard a clear sign, so you concluded that you were brainwashed by a bunch of unloving fundamentalists and threw the baby Jesus out with the bathwater.
Its OK...I question things too...but some things are obvious to me.
who cares if God saves everybody? I can get along with Hitler if God allows him to clean up, first. And that annoying street guy at church that always wants a ride home! And that irritable assistant manager at work.
I believe that I only will be able to have unconditional love with Gods help, however. I like teenagers but I dislike smelly old street people. Know what I mean?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 28 by Taz, posted 01-12-2008 4:57 PM Taz has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2195 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 30 of 104 (448244)
01-12-2008 5:48 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by ThreeDogs
01-11-2008 11:20 AM


quote:
In a love relationship with anyone, do the lovers expect something in return? Does Jesus?
Well, I don't know about Jesus, but if we're talking about the Abrahamic God, He most definitely expects a lot in return.
The OT God's love is very conditional.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by ThreeDogs, posted 01-11-2008 11:20 AM ThreeDogs has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 52 by ThreeDogs, posted 01-14-2008 9:13 AM nator has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024