Hi Phatboy,
Barring jar's highly pertinent point in the previous post, I'll accept the bait.
I'm usually fairly suspicious of talk of "rights". It's usually a case of law for the powerful, and rights for the weak. The right of wheelchair access was won through a good deal of hard work and organization on the part of wheelchair users. They made a fair point about their requirements, and the rest of society (largely) agreed.
To my knowledge, incestuous siblings are yet to put any effort into winning new rights. If they fought for it, I don't see that I'd have any particular qualms in supporting it.
What's the point?
mick
[added in edit - I posted this at the same time as Phatboy's response to jar]
This message has been edited by mick, 04-01-2005 07:55 PM