Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,423 Year: 3,680/9,624 Month: 551/974 Week: 164/276 Day: 4/34 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   wife or husband?
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1426 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 46 of 52 (168844)
12-16-2004 7:35 AM
Reply to: Message 43 by berberry
12-16-2004 1:46 AM


archie B
I think you hit it. Pehaps the perceived threat of gay marriage is that it is a threat to their conception of the male role - they are the god-given king of the castle, and others in the house submit: how could any man chose to submit (submissive is more appropriate term than recessive, I was just using that for a subtle genetic analogy)? Certainly they are just as upset about feminism (aka rush's feminazis) as a threat to their "traditional" role, when in fact it is just another person.
People can only be upset about things that affect them, and thus it is curious to me the way some people get so bent out of shape by the behind-closed-doors behavior of others that they only know about by reputation (whether it is gay life-style or blue dresses and cigars).
As far as archie goes, my first marriage (lasted 5 years, parted friends) the father-in-law was archie, mil was edith, and I was the long-haired son-in-law .... I never really saw much humor in it then (for some reason?). but yes, as a portrayal of "traditional roles" it shows the dominant\submissive pattern.

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
{{{Buddha walks off laughing with joy}}}

This message is a reply to:
 Message 43 by berberry, posted 12-16-2004 1:46 AM berberry has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 47 by coffee_addict, posted 12-16-2004 7:47 AM RAZD has replied

  
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 498 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 47 of 52 (168846)
12-16-2004 7:47 AM
Reply to: Message 46 by RAZD
12-16-2004 7:35 AM


Re: archie B
Speaking of the subject of dominant and submissive, I just asked my friends and they all told me that I seem like the submissive type. I think I need to toughen up a bit, don't you think?

Hate world.
Revenge soon!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by RAZD, posted 12-16-2004 7:35 AM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 50 by RAZD, posted 12-16-2004 8:52 PM coffee_addict has not replied

  
contracycle
Inactive Member


Message 48 of 52 (168892)
12-16-2004 11:48 AM
Reply to: Message 45 by Silent H
12-16-2004 6:09 AM


quote:
You have a one line answer to my last sentence alone, and it doesn't even debate the point of that sentence. Pure ad hominem is hardly mature, is it?
Fine. I point blank reject your assertion that I was "looking for a fight" and I am bloody sick and tired of you excusing your insulting behaviour by spurious allegations about another persons intent or psychological state.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by Silent H, posted 12-16-2004 6:09 AM Silent H has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 49 by Silent H, posted 12-16-2004 12:27 PM contracycle has not replied

  
Silent H
Member (Idle past 5841 days)
Posts: 7405
From: satellite of love
Joined: 12-11-2002


Message 49 of 52 (168902)
12-16-2004 12:27 PM
Reply to: Message 48 by contracycle
12-16-2004 11:48 AM


your assertion that I was "looking for a fight"
It wasn't just an assertion. I have already stated I had an argument and the final statement was a conclusion drawn from the argument.
It was very simple to understand what was being meant and to keep acting like something else was meant appears to be just looking for a fight.
bloody sick and tired of you excusing your insulting behaviour by spurious allegations about another persons intent or psychological state.
They aren't spurious, but otherwise, fine. What's your excuse?

holmes
"...what a fool believes he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.."(D. Bros)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by contracycle, posted 12-16-2004 11:48 AM contracycle has not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1426 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 50 of 52 (169162)
12-16-2004 8:52 PM
Reply to: Message 47 by coffee_addict
12-16-2004 7:47 AM


Re: archie B
yeah, you just sit back too much and let others walk all over you. heh.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by coffee_addict, posted 12-16-2004 7:47 AM coffee_addict has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 51 by Asgara, posted 12-16-2004 9:10 PM RAZD has replied

  
Asgara
Member (Idle past 2324 days)
Posts: 1783
From: Wisconsin, USA
Joined: 05-10-2003


Message 51 of 52 (169166)
12-16-2004 9:10 PM
Reply to: Message 50 by RAZD
12-16-2004 8:52 PM


Re: archie B
LOL, I was going to respond with the same point. Lammy is about as submissive as a pitbull with a taste for mailman.

Asgara
"Embrace the pain, spank your inner moppet, whatever....but get over it"
http://asgarasworld.bravepages.com
http://perditionsgate.bravepages.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 50 by RAZD, posted 12-16-2004 8:52 PM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 52 by RAZD, posted 12-16-2004 10:08 PM Asgara has not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1426 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 52 of 52 (169180)
12-16-2004 10:08 PM
Reply to: Message 51 by Asgara
12-16-2004 9:10 PM


Re: archie B
a regular lammykins.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by Asgara, posted 12-16-2004 9:10 PM Asgara has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024