Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,833 Year: 4,090/9,624 Month: 961/974 Week: 288/286 Day: 9/40 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Mike's ego trip
nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 14 of 82 (188449)
02-25-2005 9:31 AM
Reply to: Message 11 by mike the wiz
02-25-2005 9:22 AM


Re: Charles Knight is an ass hat
quote:
Wow - what a big and huge gargantua of add hominem poppycock delirium. If I've been arrogant or rude, please quote me. I really don't know what caused this huge off-topic attack on the character of irrefutable brilliance in which I embody.
Mike, how is it that you know that NDE's are taking place during or after brain death?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by mike the wiz, posted 02-25-2005 9:22 AM mike the wiz has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 16 by mike the wiz, posted 02-25-2005 9:35 AM nator has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 22 of 82 (188460)
02-25-2005 9:50 AM
Reply to: Message 16 by mike the wiz
02-25-2005 9:35 AM


Re: Charles Knight is an ass hat
quote:
Shraff, I answered your post the other day.
I've just had a look.
It's true that you answered the post, but you didn't answer the question.
Ohnhai's reply to you poses all of the questions you need to address regarding how it is you think you know that NDE's happen simultaneously with or after brain death, so I will look for your reply to that post for an answer to the question.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by mike the wiz, posted 02-25-2005 9:35 AM mike the wiz has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 24 by mike the wiz, posted 02-25-2005 10:00 AM nator has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 31 of 82 (188526)
02-25-2005 3:30 PM
Reply to: Message 24 by mike the wiz
02-25-2005 10:00 AM


Re: Charles Knight is an ass hat
quote:
Didn't I answer the question though? If became alive when the experience ended, after being clinically dead, then logically they must have been brain dead for somewhat of the experience.
1) You have not shown any evidence that any of the people who experience NDE's actually are BRAIN dead, as opposed to clinically dead.
As in, have any of these people been hooked up to an EEG or had an MRI to demonstrate a lack of any and all brain activity? If someone's heart has stopped beating and their breathing has stopped, they will not be moving, but this does not mean that all brain activity has stopped.
You can't tell just by looking at them.
2) You still have absolutely no evidence, so therefore no reason to conlude, that the NDE happened at any specific time. That's my question; How do you know WHEN the NDE experience happened?
That is a claim that needs evidence to support it, and right now you have none.
3) NDE's have been induced in an experimental context. Read more here:
near-death experience (NDE) - The Skeptic's Dictionary - Skepdic.com
Dr. Karl Jansen has reproduced NDEs with ketamine, a short-acting, hallucinogenic, dissociative anaesthetic.
The anaesthesia is the result of the patient being so 'dissociated' and 'removed from their body' that it is possible to carry out surgical procedures. This is wholly different from the 'unconsciousness' produced by conventional anesthetics, although ketamine is also an excellent analgesic (pain killer) by a different route (i.e. not due to dissociation). Ketamine is related to phencyclidine (PCP). Both drugs are arylcyclohexylamines - they are not opioids and are not related to LSD. In contrast to PCP, ketamine is relatively safe, is much shorter acting, is an uncontrolled drug in most countries, and remains in use as an anaesthetic for children in industrialised countries and all ages in the third world as it is cheap and easy to use. Anaesthetists prevent patients from having NDE's ('emergence phenomena') by the co-administration of sedatives which produce 'true' unconsciousness rather than dissociation.*
According to Dr. Jansen, ketamine can reproduce all the main features of the NDE, including travel through a dark tunnel into the light, the feeling that one is dead, communing with God, hallucinations, out-of-body experiences, strange noises, etc. This does not prove that there is no life after death, but it does prove that an NDE is not proof of an afterlife.
quote:
The evo doesn't have to answer to anyone.
Of course we do. We answer to the evidence and to the rules of logic and rational inquiry, just like everybody else.
quote:
It's 1 on the crowd for the creo, and the crowd on the 1 for the evo.
Yup, sure is. Too bad for you, isn't it? Sorry that your claims are being examined so well. Perhaps you'd rather we just ignore you?
quote:
So surely you can see that I cannot respond to every whim in the evo machine?
Look, asking you to support your position with evidence is not a "whim". It's the rules of debate here, remember?
If you make a claim, expect it to get examined nine ways to Sunday, and expect any weaknesses, like lack of empirical support, to be exposed. That's what we do here.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by mike the wiz, posted 02-25-2005 10:00 AM mike the wiz has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 34 of 82 (188678)
02-26-2005 9:10 AM
Reply to: Message 32 by mike the wiz
02-25-2005 7:44 PM


quote:
Due to the nature of the forum, it is expected that demand for creationists is high and creationists are few.
I agree that creationists who are able to follow our rules of debate are few, and the demand for such creationists here is high.
quote:
I have answered all of the posts I can within reasonable expectations.
Not according to the general rules of good, effective debate nor the forum guidelines.
...not that you've done really poorly, but I must concur with others that you have seemed very agitated and out of sorts lately. Upset, and frankly, rather whiny about being asked to back up your claims.
I have always treated your posts the same. You make a factual claim, I ask you to back it up with evidence.
Is there anything wrong, mike? Is there any difficulty in your life that is making you behave this way?
quote:
I apologize for calling Charles an ass-hat
I would ordinarily praise you at this point. However, your apology has a qualifier...
quote:
but his post was highly offensive and un-provoked, which is why I said it.
...which simply negates the apology because you just rationalized the insult as justified in the first place.
Sorry, you can't have it both ways.
Oh, and I do not agree that his post was highly offensive. He called your IDEAS a bunch of bollocks, NOT YOU.
quote:
Due to mis-understanding and misconstruement of my intentions, and also because of people interpreting humor as personal attacks I shall withdraw my participation in the forum. I could only be understood with a new alias at this stage, without being attacked personally.
So, you're a martyr now?
Gee, and here I thought Contracycle was our main drama queen. Who would have think the tiara rightfully belongs to mike the wiz?
Don't you think you're overreacting just a teeny bit?
quote:
I'm sure many are glad to see me leave because they think I should have turned evo at this stage.
This is just your martyr complex talking again.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by mike the wiz, posted 02-25-2005 7:44 PM mike the wiz has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 35 by mike the wiz, posted 02-26-2005 11:16 AM nator has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 45 of 82 (188795)
02-26-2005 7:55 PM
Reply to: Message 39 by Buzsaw
02-26-2005 5:13 PM


Re: Deserved Cruelty
Buz, this was an admirable, thoughtful post.
Very well done.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 39 by Buzsaw, posted 02-26-2005 5:13 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 52 by Buzsaw, posted 02-27-2005 11:10 PM nator has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2197 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 46 of 82 (188796)
02-26-2005 8:04 PM
Reply to: Message 43 by mike the wiz
02-26-2005 6:11 PM


quote:
and also Shraff dissapoints me a bit too aswell
Well, mike, I have got to say that your non-apology to Charles disappointed me. ("I'm sorry, charles, but I'm actually not, and I am also justified in calling you names"."
Your refusal to admit that you have no basis for thinking that NDE's happen at any particular time is also disappointing to me.
You used to be much more honest in your discussions, mike. You used to be able to take in information and recognize when you had made an error. You used to be a much better dabator from a rational standpoint.
Now you seem to be sliding into dogmatism and refusal to doubt anything which you prefer to be true, no matter how much evidence is presented to you or how contrary to logic your preferred view is.
That is the most disappointing thing of all to me.
This message has been edited by schrafinator, 02-26-2005 20:05 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 43 by mike the wiz, posted 02-26-2005 6:11 PM mike the wiz has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024