Mike's ego trip

I read it and thought you were talking a load of bollocks - so yes I judged for myself.I'll echo some of the previous comments, your posts seem to have changed in tone and direction. It's like you realised that your worldview was a busted flush but decided to stick it out anyway.

No it was not "unwarrented attacked" - you asked people to judge the material submitted for post of the month themselves. I did feel that it was a load of bollocks - just a mishmash of your wishlist.Look at what I posted just afterwards - it quite clear that it was not a personal attack on you. I'm not sure what changing to a different alias will do if you posts continue to go down the road that they going at present. Moreover it wouldn't change the basic of your claim one iota.This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 26 February 2005 05:11 AMThis message has been edited by Charles Knight, 26 February 2005 05:18 AMThis message has been edited by Charles Knight, 26 February 2005 10:43 AM