There has been a lot of news recently as well as research on the Scythians, including a recent treasure find that was astounding. Over the last 50 years or so we've learned a lot about the Scythians, and it certainly seems they were an Indo-European group that likely migrated from China or India into the area North of the Black Sea.
No where though is there any indication of a connection between the Lost Tribes and the Scythians.
But again, that has nothing to do with the OP.
No where in the Declaration is there any indication that the Scots believed they were descended from one of the Lost Tribes.
AbE: Link to the entry on the Scythians from the Hermitage Museum.
This message has been edited by jar, 02-10-2006 01:38 PM
Re: No Ray, once again it does not say what you assert.
Sycthians means sons of Isaac (Dr. Scott). All opposition in this thread simply asserts contrary to what the evidence plainly dictates. Here we have Darwinists, persons claiming to be loyal to evidence, asserting contrary to Dan's mark across Eurasia.
so my saying you arn't bothering to read what things mean to the people in question is somehow wrong ray? do you know what dun means in irish? it means hillfort how in the world can you relate that to a biblical figure?
The point is the Scots are CLAIMING ancestry from Israel, but then again all opposition here is basically consistent in the fact that they believe human evolution which has not one prima facie fact in support.
no they are not they are basing the timing of their ancesters coming to scotland to the same time the hewbrews crossed the red sea, where can you read that as they are claiming ancestry from israel? this is total BS ray pot shots at evolution show that you can't make reasoned arguements
"Most Holy Father and Lord, we know and from the chronicles and books of the ancients we find that among other famous nations our own, the Scots, has been graced with widespread renown. They journeyed from Greater Scythia by way of the Tyrrhenian Sea and the Pillars of Hercules, and dwelt for a long course of time in Spain among the most savage tribes, but nowhere could they be subdued by any race, however barbarous. Thence they came, twelve hundred years after the people of Israel crossed the Red Sea, to their home in the west where they still live today."
Where is the assertion that the Scots thought they were descendants of a Lost Tribe?
Hebrew means "wanderer" as they wandered all over Eurasia and founded Western culture. Didn't know any of this ? = power of Satan as seen in his ability to control secular historians from reporting these facts. Either way the Bible is proven true: Satan or Hebrews in Europe.
This message has been edited by Herepton, 02-10-2006 02:36 PM
Interesting stuff. I sort of wonder why people in the Caucuses and in Spain were both called Ibernians, but maybe the Hebrew angle is the answer.
History, and the Apocrapha, loses the lost tribes at the Caucuses Mountains, hence the term "caucasain"/light skinned semetics/SHEMites. The term "semitic" and its derivatives proves the Patriarch lived.
There is no "Hebrew angle" it is a massive fact of history that secular has "suppressed" (Romans 1:18 NewKJV).
Hebrew/Hibernia/Ibernia = evolution of the word.
Hibernia was the original name of Ireland. Where did the only red-race originate from ?
Heremon married the last remaining daughter of Zedekiah, who was overlooked by Nebuchadnezzar when he killed all the male heirs to the throne of David. God's law said if all the males had expired then the daughters could inherit. Jeremiah transported this princess to Ireland by way of Egypt and Spain.
And he sent, and brought him in. Now he was ruddy, and withal of a beautiful countenance, and goodly to look to. And the LORD said, Arise, anoint him: for this is he.
Speaking of David and his appearance: ruddy, it means "reddish". Zedekiah's daughter was the last of the Davidic line: explains the true origin of the only red-race.
The current British throne = descendants of David.