Hi Buz,
quote:
What makes you so sure that many of the Gitmo prisoners are innocent victims? Amnesty International? If so, where is the documentation?
You are missing the point. They are innocent until proven guilty. It's also a little difficult to know what people are guilty or not guilty of, before they are charged with something. What are they accused of? Being evil?
They should be given trials. To do otherwise is to squander the moral high ground.
quote:
Imo, the military knows better who's innocent and who's not.
Better than who? Better than judges and juries? how far are you willing to push this principle? Should all criminals be handed over to the military? Can we do away with jury trials?
If not, why should some people get trials and others not.
quote:
What would be the military's motivation for rounding up innocents?
They seem to have employed a scatter-shot approach, taking anyone who had any suspicion attached to them. This, combined with a system of financial rewards for those providing info that led to arrests, has led to a lot of people being rounded up and shipped off to Gitmo, only to be freed without charge. It has happened already. They have effectively admitted to making mistakes.
The question you should be asking is what did the Bush administration have to lose from admitting that Gitmo was a wash out? They could only lose by admitting their mistake. They had little choice but to stick to their guns.
Obama's moves to shut down Gitmo, have been widely welcomed abroad, not simply by Muslim nations, but by many (if not most) of America's allies. There is a reason for that. The Guantanamo Gulag has been a PR disaster for the Western democracies as a whole and it has inspired more terrorism than it has stopped. Good riddance.
Mutate and Survive
"The Bible is like a person, and if you torture it long enough, you can get it to say almost anything you'd like it to say." -- Rev. Dr. Francis H. Wade