Of course. It is a fallacious argument in that better or clearer writing styles equate to correct arguments. I used to go to
another forum where many of the creationists had excellent writing skills, producing coherent sentences, but producing half-baked arguments that revolved around fallacies and in one's case, numerous hoaxes. Their writing styles were free of errors and had excellent grammar, yet their arguments were completely full of hash.
One of the best creationists I've seen used good writing to snooker ignorant people into believing him. Doesn't make him right though.