Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,758 Year: 4,015/9,624 Month: 886/974 Week: 213/286 Day: 20/109 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   On the verge of a break-through
2ice_baked_taters
Member (Idle past 5877 days)
Posts: 566
From: Boulder Junction WI.
Joined: 02-16-2006


Message 92 of 112 (325168)
06-23-2006 4:02 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by riVeRraT
06-15-2006 8:54 AM


Just some good reasoning. An opinion cannot be forced on anyone except by physical force. In this case it may happen if some sort of law is passed. We "accept" these instances because we accept majority rule.
You are not forcing anything. You are simply being honest. Never appologise for being honest.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by riVeRraT, posted 06-15-2006 8:54 AM riVeRraT has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 95 by rgb, posted 06-23-2006 6:54 PM 2ice_baked_taters has replied

  
2ice_baked_taters
Member (Idle past 5877 days)
Posts: 566
From: Boulder Junction WI.
Joined: 02-16-2006


Message 112 of 112 (329210)
07-06-2006 4:10 AM
Reply to: Message 95 by rgb
06-23-2006 6:54 PM


People (especially women) who have been in abusive relationships would disagree with you.
They are simply lying to themselves.
I'm a bit curious about you. Would you consider a law to suppose to represent the majority rule or protect minority rights?
A law will represent the majority or it will not remain a law.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 95 by rgb, posted 06-23-2006 6:54 PM rgb has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024