Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,469 Year: 3,726/9,624 Month: 597/974 Week: 210/276 Day: 50/34 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   On the verge of a break-through
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 438 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 31 of 112 (322297)
06-16-2006 1:17 PM
Reply to: Message 25 by mike the wiz
06-16-2006 10:54 AM


Sinful and lawful are 2 different things.
but we're not obliged to endorse what God calls sin.
We are not endorsing it. As far as the church is concerned, I said it should not be allowed. I am not endorsing it but giving the freedom to choose what they want. It's their choice, not mine. I hate to look at it, but that is my problem isn't it? There are many things I hate to look at that are legal.
If we don't want our children to think it is ok, then it's really up to us to fully explain to them why it isn't, and up to us to be good enough spiritual leaders, that God will show them also. God will bless my family, if I follow Him.
As far as the world is concerned, if I deny it, then I deny my own right to practice whatever religion I see fit, or however I interpret it.
If I endorse it, or I don't endorse it, I am judging it. The bible tells us it is a sin. I feel it is a sin also, but I won't judge it. I will instead put my faith in God for Him to deal with it.
God has gave us freewill, but does that then mean that we should preach that desire should simply be fulfilled?
Christian is not the national religion. Freedom is.
That that pathetic person would actually murder a child to satisfy his hard-on, is evidence that desire can be a sickeningly wicked and evil thing.
No doubt, but there is no comparison between the two. All sins are equal, so in God's eyes we all sin, and fall short.
The problem with murder is that it involves the unwillingness of one party. There is no consent. Homosexuals consent to each other, so we do not have to protect them from themselves, or tell them what is sin or not. That is between them and God.
In a church, of course this is different. There should at least be an attempt at making a place Holy, and sin free. This doesn't mean gays should stay out of church, but that nobody should be practicing their sins within the walls of the church.
Even Paul was a sinner and struggled with sin. He got away with his sin legally, and was tortured for his belief in God. What is wrong with that picture? Who should judge us, man or God?
It is only marriage which sanctifies and cleanses the desire, that it is there for a purpose.
A marraige in God's eyes, in the church, not in the world. There 2 kinds of marraige.
Now all of this desire is from the selfish evil flesh, and we know it's nature; that it would murder to gratify. Therefore we are guilty of obeying our evil selfish genes.
This is the only evidence I can find that answers the question if gay people are born that way or not. If God made em that way, then God must show them a way out.
There is no doubt in my mind that one touch of the Holy Spirit would show them a way around it. I have seen it happen before. The Holy Spirit has removed several of my sinful desires.
But do we then endorse fornication, and believe that it is "fine" to do what God says to not do.
Jesus said to run from sexual immorality, not lock them up, or make it illegal in our governement. But then again Jesus hung out with the sinners, and maybe he just wants us to run from it in our hearts.
Seems to me like you are using your religious views, and interpretations to define morality for the nation. Can you think of a non-religious view why it is wrong?
Maybe we should make a national religion, and force you to follow it, or burn in hell.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by mike the wiz, posted 06-16-2006 10:54 AM mike the wiz has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 40 by nator, posted 06-16-2006 7:01 PM riVeRraT has replied
 Message 48 by mike the wiz, posted 06-17-2006 10:54 AM riVeRraT has replied
 Message 80 by berberry, posted 06-19-2006 2:09 PM riVeRraT has not replied
 Message 87 by ramoss, posted 06-21-2006 9:34 AM riVeRraT has not replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 438 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 32 of 112 (322303)
06-16-2006 1:22 PM
Reply to: Message 29 by rgb
06-16-2006 12:58 PM


And now that you have changed your mind, you are uncomfortable with people who disagree with you. Perhaps it's time you try to see this from the side of the debate you used to dislike?
I haven't really changed my heart on how I feel about it, only decided not to push this view on the world/nation.
I see things from all sides, always, I have been one many sides already.
I was never uncomfortable with people who disagree with me. I embrace the freedom we share in being able to disagree, and would rescue anyone on this forum from a burning car with my life, if I had the chance.
I just want you to be honest in who and what you are, and argue from that standpoint, and not play devils advocate. This way there can be some relative meaning to your words.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 29 by rgb, posted 06-16-2006 12:58 PM rgb has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 35 by rgb, posted 06-16-2006 2:46 PM riVeRraT has replied

  
Jazzns
Member (Idle past 3933 days)
Posts: 2657
From: A Better America
Joined: 07-23-2004


Message 33 of 112 (322304)
06-16-2006 1:23 PM
Reply to: Message 30 by rgb
06-16-2006 1:07 PM


I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them
Yea, so where in the OT is the law that non-procreative sex within marriage is a sin?
The guy that got God's wrath for "pulling out" was because he was denying his brother an heir, not because he getting jiggy with his new wife only to get his rocks off.

Of course, biblical creationists are committed to belief in God's written Word, the Bible, which forbids bearing false witness; --AIG (lest they forget)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by rgb, posted 06-16-2006 1:07 PM rgb has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 36 by rgb, posted 06-16-2006 2:52 PM Jazzns has replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 438 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 34 of 112 (322306)
06-16-2006 1:25 PM
Reply to: Message 30 by rgb
06-16-2006 1:07 PM


Jesus never mentioned about specific sexual acts, but he did repeatedly referred to the sexual immoralities that were mentioned in the OT.
Jesus did not come to judge, but to save.
If the law says there will come a time when the law will change, then it must change, that is fulfillment.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by rgb, posted 06-16-2006 1:07 PM rgb has not replied

  
rgb
Inactive Member


Message 35 of 112 (322333)
06-16-2006 2:46 PM
Reply to: Message 32 by riVeRraT
06-16-2006 1:22 PM


riverrat writes
quote:
I haven't really changed my heart on how I feel about it, only decided not to push this view on the world/nation.
The fact that you have decided to stop pushing your view onto the world is a change itself.
quote:
I see things from all sides, always, I have been one many sides already.
Forgive me, but I simply disagree.
quote:
I was never uncomfortable with people who disagree with me. I embrace the freedom we share in being able to disagree, and would rescue anyone on this forum from a burning car with my life, if I had the chance.
While you might be embracing this freedom now, you did not embrace it in the past.
quote:
I just want you to be honest in who and what you are, and argue from that standpoint, and not play devils advocate.
Who said I was playing devil's advocate?
quote:
This way there can be some relative meaning to your words.
The all seeing eyes of the rat talking?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by riVeRraT, posted 06-16-2006 1:22 PM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 43 by riVeRraT, posted 06-16-2006 7:13 PM rgb has not replied

  
rgb
Inactive Member


Message 36 of 112 (322336)
06-16-2006 2:52 PM
Reply to: Message 33 by Jazzns
06-16-2006 1:23 PM


Jazzns writes
quote:
The guy that got God's wrath for "pulling out" was because he was denying his brother an heir, not because he getting jiggy with his new wife only to get his rocks off.
In Animal Farm, the law isn't really about sleeping on human beds. It's about sleeping on human beds with sheets.
In just about everything that has ever been written, if you really wanted to you can nitpick it to a a point where the assertion supports your own view.
Edited by rgb, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by Jazzns, posted 06-16-2006 1:23 PM Jazzns has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 37 by Jazzns, posted 06-16-2006 3:54 PM rgb has replied

  
Jazzns
Member (Idle past 3933 days)
Posts: 2657
From: A Better America
Joined: 07-23-2004


Message 37 of 112 (322361)
06-16-2006 3:54 PM
Reply to: Message 36 by rgb
06-16-2006 2:52 PM


What you are dismissing as a nit pick I consider to be a valid interpretation of the text. You can either just cry, "interpretation" which does nothing to further the conversation or try to show how my interpretation is invalid.
There is such a thing as invalid interpretation. If I said that I interpreted that passage to mean that the law says that sperm shouldn't touch the ground then I would be wrong. My interpretation would be avoiding the context of the passage and the reason they were doing what they were.
But even if I do have an invalid interpretation it does not matter. Like I said before, even if homosexuality is a sin in the eyes of God there is no reason for Christians to deny same-sex marriages.
Jesus introduced the concept of sin of the heart and yet the "moral majority" is not pushing to get rid of free speech so that we can ban Dance Off, Pants Off. God will judge the sin of people who have adulterous thoughts and we as a society see no value in making an effort to stop people from commiting that particular sin of the heart. By the same reasoning we cannot deny same-sex marriages without being total hypocrites.

Of course, biblical creationists are committed to belief in God's written Word, the Bible, which forbids bearing false witness; --AIG (lest they forget)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by rgb, posted 06-16-2006 2:52 PM rgb has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 39 by rgb, posted 06-16-2006 6:56 PM Jazzns has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2192 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 38 of 112 (322405)
06-16-2006 6:54 PM
Reply to: Message 25 by mike the wiz
06-16-2006 10:54 AM


Mike, I find it really distubing that you are seemingly equating someone who becomes sexually aroused by murdering children with the physical expression of sexual desire between two consenting adults of the same sex.
And I am also incredibly sad and dismayed that you believe this next bit:
quote:
Now all of this desire is from the selfish evil flesh, and we know it's nature; that it would murder to gratify. Therefore we are guilty of obeying our evil selfish genes.
Do you really despise, hate, revile, and loathe yourself, and indeed, all of humanity, so completely?
I am so glad I am not a Christian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by mike the wiz, posted 06-16-2006 10:54 AM mike the wiz has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 42 by iano, posted 06-16-2006 7:07 PM nator has not replied
 Message 49 by mike the wiz, posted 06-17-2006 11:55 AM nator has replied

  
rgb
Inactive Member


Message 39 of 112 (322406)
06-16-2006 6:56 PM
Reply to: Message 37 by Jazzns
06-16-2006 3:54 PM


Jazzns writes
quote:
But even if I do have an invalid interpretation it does not matter. Like I said before, even if homosexuality is a sin in the eyes of God there is no reason for Christians to deny same-sex marriages.
Christians don't see it as denying anyone any right he hasn't already has. They see it as not giving a priviledge to anyone. Everyone has the right to marry a person of the opposite sex. Everyone, including gay people, have such right.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by Jazzns, posted 06-16-2006 3:54 PM Jazzns has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 41 by crashfrog, posted 06-16-2006 7:05 PM rgb has not replied
 Message 45 by Jazzns, posted 06-16-2006 9:04 PM rgb has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2192 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 40 of 112 (322408)
06-16-2006 7:01 PM
Reply to: Message 31 by riVeRraT
06-16-2006 1:17 PM


quote:
I hate to look at it, but that is my problem isn't it?
1) Good for you for taking the position that "it's your problem".
2) It's so sad that you hate to look upon normally accepted public expressions of love between consenting adults, no matter who is doing the expressing.
Being uncomfortable with it, or finding it unusual, or unfamiliar, or not personally finding it pleasant is one thing, but hate? That's a serious overreaction.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by riVeRraT, posted 06-16-2006 1:17 PM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 44 by riVeRraT, posted 06-16-2006 7:19 PM nator has replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1489 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 41 of 112 (322409)
06-16-2006 7:05 PM
Reply to: Message 39 by rgb
06-16-2006 6:56 PM


Everyone has the right to marry a person of the opposite sex. Everyone, including gay people, have such right.
Actually, they don't. If somebody catches wise to the fact that one of the participants of such a union is gay, it's assumed the marriage is a fraud and it can be annuled upon the prompting of a third party, in most states anyway.
But really? What you've just said is semantic wordplay. It's a joke. It isn't a serious argument, and it's amazing that an adult has to be told that. It's like when Henry Ford said you could get the Model T "in any color you want, as long as its black."
Nobody mistook that, at that time, to mean Ford was offering an actual choice of colors. It's amazing that, in the present day, some people just don't get that.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 39 by rgb, posted 06-16-2006 6:56 PM rgb has not replied

  
iano
Member (Idle past 1963 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 42 of 112 (322410)
06-16-2006 7:07 PM
Reply to: Message 38 by nator
06-16-2006 6:54 PM


Mike, I find it really distubing that you are seemingly equating someone who becomes sexually aroused by murdering children with the physical expression of sexual desire between two consenting adults of the same sex.
Why? Ol' flexi-morals herself has a concrete base?
(And in asking the question I wonder will I be viewed by you as I view Crash or Ringo...or even you at times)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 38 by nator, posted 06-16-2006 6:54 PM nator has not replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 438 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 43 of 112 (322411)
06-16-2006 7:13 PM
Reply to: Message 35 by rgb
06-16-2006 2:46 PM


The fact that you have decided to stop pushing your view onto the world is a change itself.
I never really pushed my view on the world to begin with. It's really not up to me.
What I am saying is, should it come to it, I would vote for same-sex marriage.
I see things from all sides, always, I have been one many sides already.
Forgive me, but I simply disagree.
Then you pretend to know me.
While you might be embracing this freedom now, you did not embrace it in the past.
Always, thanks for not judging me.
Who said I was playing devil's advocate?
Dude, who are you, and what are you?
Why do you pretend to be something your not?
quote:This way there can be some relative meaning to your words.
The all seeing eyes of the rat talking?
All I'm saying to is, don't be one person in the forums, than another person in chat, it don't work for me.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by rgb, posted 06-16-2006 2:46 PM rgb has not replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 438 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 44 of 112 (322413)
06-16-2006 7:19 PM
Reply to: Message 40 by nator
06-16-2006 7:01 PM


You never cease to amaze me. Even when you agree with me, you still have to disagree with me. And I wtill say your reading comprehension is lacking.
I will quote myself from Message 1
"Please keep in mind, that I do not hate! "
Can you do me a favor and explain how you got that I hate gays from any of this? It makes no sense to me at all.
Logical thinking, after reading all I just wrote, could only bring you to the decision that if I hate gays, then I hate myself.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 40 by nator, posted 06-16-2006 7:01 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 47 by nator, posted 06-17-2006 8:42 AM riVeRraT has replied

  
Jazzns
Member (Idle past 3933 days)
Posts: 2657
From: A Better America
Joined: 07-23-2004


Message 45 of 112 (322421)
06-16-2006 9:04 PM
Reply to: Message 39 by rgb
06-16-2006 6:56 PM


Christians don't see it as denying anyone any right he hasn't already has.
And my point is if you haven't notice that those Christians are not basing such a view on anything but their own need to be the arbiter of morals in this world. It is not Bibilical and it is hypocritical given the other sins of the heart that are ignored over this issue of homosexuality.
Have you actually been reading my posts or do you just reply to the first sentence that wags your tail?

Of course, biblical creationists are committed to belief in God's written Word, the Bible, which forbids bearing false witness; --AIG (lest they forget)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 39 by rgb, posted 06-16-2006 6:56 PM rgb has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 46 by rgb, posted 06-16-2006 10:13 PM Jazzns has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024