Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,480 Year: 3,737/9,624 Month: 608/974 Week: 221/276 Day: 61/34 Hour: 4/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   George Bush leads us into the world of Kafka.
Legend
Member (Idle past 5028 days)
Posts: 1226
From: Wales, UK
Joined: 05-07-2004


Message 32 of 150 (349784)
09-17-2006 1:04 PM


a comment for our american friends.
at the end of the day, a siginificant number of you guys (and girls) voted for this and continue to support this.
quote:
The man who trades basic liberties for temporary security does not deserve either and will end up getting neither.
- Benjamin Franklin
'nough said.

"In life, you have to face that some days you'll be the pigeon and some days you'll be the statue."

Replies to this message:
 Message 40 by crashfrog, posted 09-17-2006 5:58 PM Legend has not replied

  
Legend
Member (Idle past 5028 days)
Posts: 1226
From: Wales, UK
Joined: 05-07-2004


Message 33 of 150 (349788)
09-17-2006 1:12 PM
Reply to: Message 30 by Hyroglyphx
09-17-2006 12:25 PM


Re: A general reply
nemesis writes:
The US was attacked, unprovoked,....
wooaaaaa.... you should really think more carefully about making statements like that.
I sincerely hope the word "unprovoked" popped in there as the result of a copy and paste accident rather than a reasoning process.
Next you'll be telling us that those murderous Iraqi civilians attack innocent US soldiers in downtown Baghdad totally unprovoked !

"In life, you have to face that some days you'll be the pigeon and some days you'll be the statue."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by Hyroglyphx, posted 09-17-2006 12:25 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 34 by Chiroptera, posted 09-17-2006 1:26 PM Legend has replied
 Message 55 by Hyroglyphx, posted 09-19-2006 11:27 AM Legend has replied

  
Legend
Member (Idle past 5028 days)
Posts: 1226
From: Wales, UK
Joined: 05-07-2004


Message 35 of 150 (349795)
09-17-2006 2:10 PM
Reply to: Message 34 by Chiroptera
09-17-2006 1:26 PM


Re: A general reply
Chiroptera writes:
Words have one important function: to constrain thought along the lines approved by our owners and leaders.
Too right! a good example here in Britain is the Thought Police's term for speed cameras: 'safety cameras', though they have very little to do with safety and a much more accurate moniker would be 'money cameras'.
If people get used to calling them 'safety-cameras', however, they will tend to think they're there for their own good, rather than the establishment's.
Similarly, if people in the US tend to think of the terrorists' attacks as 'unprovoked' they will find it much easier to accept and approve aggresive, illegal and immoral actions, such as the current Iraq/Afghanistan saga or the Kafka-esque methods Bush is trying to establish, as per the OP.

"In life, you have to face that some days you'll be the pigeon and some days you'll be the statue."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 34 by Chiroptera, posted 09-17-2006 1:26 PM Chiroptera has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 46 by nator, posted 09-18-2006 8:36 AM Legend has replied

  
Legend
Member (Idle past 5028 days)
Posts: 1226
From: Wales, UK
Joined: 05-07-2004


Message 49 of 150 (350069)
09-18-2006 6:00 PM
Reply to: Message 46 by nator
09-18-2006 8:36 AM


Re: A general reply
quote:
Consequently, if the use of these cameras make more people obey the speed limit, there will be fewer accidents and loss of life.
while risking getting off-topic I must say this is one of the greatest myths propagated by the anti-speed lobby, a.k.a 'Traffic safety' lobby (another great spin for a feel-good name).
Speed may compound the effects of an accident but it very rarely by itself contributes to its cause.
Excessively low speed limits are just another way of exercising control over minute details of people's lives while reinforcing the Big Brother mentality that it's all for our own good.

"In life, you have to face that some days you'll be the pigeon and some days you'll be the statue."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by nator, posted 09-18-2006 8:36 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 50 by kuresu, posted 09-18-2006 6:14 PM Legend has not replied
 Message 104 by nator, posted 09-19-2006 10:00 PM Legend has not replied

  
Legend
Member (Idle past 5028 days)
Posts: 1226
From: Wales, UK
Joined: 05-07-2004


Message 54 of 150 (350270)
09-19-2006 11:22 AM
Reply to: Message 53 by Silent H
09-19-2006 5:26 AM


Re: a comment for our american friends.
quote:
Okay, no offense but how does that get Brits off the same charge that Americans are stuck with?
we get off the charge because who we (Brits) vote for doesn't make a difference. We could have voted in a stuffed dodo as prime minister instead of Blair and it wouldn't matter. The war in Iraq, Bush's policies , etc would have happened in exactly the same way they already have.
It's because the British prime minister holds as much sway as a US state governor (or even less in the case of Florida and Texas) as far as US policy goes.
You (Yanks) on the other hand do make a difference. You could have stopped all this (war / civil liberties clampdown / et al) but you didn't.

"In life, you have to face that some days you'll be the pigeon and some days you'll be the statue."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 53 by Silent H, posted 09-19-2006 5:26 AM Silent H has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 56 by crashfrog, posted 09-19-2006 11:30 AM Legend has not replied
 Message 57 by Chiroptera, posted 09-19-2006 11:38 AM Legend has not replied
 Message 59 by Silent H, posted 09-19-2006 12:22 PM Legend has not replied

  
Legend
Member (Idle past 5028 days)
Posts: 1226
From: Wales, UK
Joined: 05-07-2004


Message 95 of 150 (350461)
09-19-2006 6:53 PM
Reply to: Message 55 by Hyroglyphx
09-19-2006 11:27 AM


Re: A general reply
nemesis writes:
What aggressive action did the US do to any Arab or Muslim nation to justify the Khobar towers, World Trade Center towers, the USS Cole, etc?
The US has directly and indirectly interfered with the internal affairs of a number of Muslim countries and people starting with its one-sided support for the state of Israel (beginning in the 1940s), which many Arab states feel is a threat to their very existence (imagine, if you will, how Americans felt for countries that supported the Soviet Union at the height of the Cold War and multiply it by ten)
Ofcourse the latest shiny example is when they recently invaded a Muslim country that posed absolutely no threat to the US killing (and still are) tens of thousands of Muslims in the process. I dread to even think how many thousands of Bin Ladens this war created.
It's all in the history books. Or do you seriously think that a bunch of Muslim fanatics just woke up one morning thinking "what shall we do today...I know, let's go kill some Americans!"
nemesis writes:
As for your 'civilian attacks' that's about as simple as asking whether or not the IRA was comprised of innocent civilians
The emphasis here is not on 'civilian' but on 'unprovoked'. The IRA bombings, however despicable, were provoked by British government actions. The 9/11 attacks, however horrendous, had been provoked by US foreign policy over the last four decades.
The future terrorist attacks that we (US & UK) will have on our soil will be tragic, detestable and will have been provoked by what we're doing now in Iraq.

"In life, you have to face that some days you'll be the pigeon and some days you'll be the statue."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 55 by Hyroglyphx, posted 09-19-2006 11:27 AM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
Legend
Member (Idle past 5028 days)
Posts: 1226
From: Wales, UK
Joined: 05-07-2004


Message 96 of 150 (350464)
09-19-2006 7:08 PM
Reply to: Message 94 by kuresu
09-19-2006 6:48 PM


Re: A general reply
Kuresu writes:
and then there's the good old standby--you attack those who are strong, who are powerful. Those who are strong, powerful, breed resentment from those who aren't. And put simply, the US is powerful. Henceforth, we are the number one target.
Oh my God!!
You do believe that a bunch of Muslims just woke up one morning thinking "what shall we do today...I know, let's go kill some Americans!" !!!
Kuresu writes:
You don't hate, you don't attack Belgium. They aren't powerful. You hate the US, you attack the US, because it is powerful.
??!!!
You don't attack Belgium because Belgium doesn't interfere with your government.
You don't attack Belgium because Belgium doesn't want to control your petrol through their own cartels and sell it on their own terms.
You don't attack Belgium because Belgium doesn't give money and arms to your number-one enemy
You don't attack Belgium because Belgium doesn't invade your country and torture your citizens.
You don't attack Belgium because Belgium minds its own fucking business and lets you mind your own.
That's why you don't attack fucking Belgium !!

"In life, you have to face that some days you'll be the pigeon and some days you'll be the statue."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 94 by kuresu, posted 09-19-2006 6:48 PM kuresu has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 99 by kuresu, posted 09-19-2006 7:29 PM Legend has not replied

  
Legend
Member (Idle past 5028 days)
Posts: 1226
From: Wales, UK
Joined: 05-07-2004


Message 119 of 150 (351237)
09-22-2006 7:34 AM
Reply to: Message 118 by Silent H
09-22-2006 5:09 AM


Re: a comment for our american friends.
quote:
Having said that I recognise Tony Blair didn't need any persuading to join Bush
holmes writes:
That is the critical point, and not just for the UK. There were plenty that backed this fiasco.
There are plenty who backed this up on both sides of the Atlantic, true enough, but the point is that for us in the UK backing it up or not doesn't change anything. Bush was dead-set on doing what he did and he has both the power and fanaticism to carry it through with or without the rest of the world, as should be evident by now.
We (Brits) could have toppled Blair and elected a new PM. So what ? What would that have changed ? Nothing, that's what. Americans, on the other hand, could have not voted for Bush, or at least not given him the percentage to justify the coup-d-etat that he effectively pulled.

"In life, you have to face that some days you'll be the pigeon and some days you'll be the statue."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 118 by Silent H, posted 09-22-2006 5:09 AM Silent H has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 120 by Silent H, posted 09-22-2006 8:18 AM Legend has replied

  
Legend
Member (Idle past 5028 days)
Posts: 1226
From: Wales, UK
Joined: 05-07-2004


Message 122 of 150 (351273)
09-22-2006 10:24 AM
Reply to: Message 120 by Silent H
09-22-2006 8:18 AM


Re: a comment for our american friends.
holmes writes:
He used international support, most especially that by the UK gov't to gain support in the US for his policies. He used intelligence findings from the UK to gain support in the US for his policies.
True on both counts but neither of these factors were essential in his determination or ability to wage war.
holmes writes:
I honestly don't see how he would have found backing for an invasion of Iraq if the world community stood against it, especially major European allies.
but the world community, especially major European allies like Germany and France did stand against it. The only reason he wanted backing was so that he could give the invasion some legitimacy and call it a 'Coallition' rather than the Rambo-lets kick-some-arab-ass event it really was.
holmes writes:
I guess I can't say it would have been physically impossible for us to invade without it, but it would have been more difficult and again would have resulted in more popular resistance.
yes it would have been more difficult in that you would have to commit more troops and therefore would have more casualties and more logistics to deal with, but nothing worse than that.
holmes writes:
And of course if Bush's zeal and power was as great as you make it out to be, I don't see how the american electorate would have stopped it either. If armed resistance from other nations would not change his course, how could a bunch of voters?
well, there really wasn't any armed resistance to speak of during the Iraq invasion. I don't think there's a single nation today that can stand up to the US militarily and he knows that. If, however, at the last elections 3 million americans hadn't voted for him I doubt we'd be having this conversation now. Granted, he could still seize power by other means but he would have lost any trace of legitimacy and respect he may be having today. He would be a dictator in the eyes of his people and he would know it. Instead, today he goes around thinking that he's a democratically elected leader who enjoys the support of his people and can get away with anything in the name of their safety.
That's what fuels the zeal you mentioned and that's something no other nation in the world has the power to change.

"In life, you have to face that some days you'll be the pigeon and some days you'll be the statue."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 120 by Silent H, posted 09-22-2006 8:18 AM Silent H has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 123 by Silent H, posted 09-22-2006 12:20 PM Legend has not replied

  
Legend
Member (Idle past 5028 days)
Posts: 1226
From: Wales, UK
Joined: 05-07-2004


Message 139 of 150 (351887)
09-24-2006 6:59 PM
Reply to: Message 134 by Quetzal
09-23-2006 11:51 AM


Re: Going It Alone
quote:
Yep - talk is cheap. If they were that upset, why didn't/don't they do anything more than whine? I guess it's kind of fun to beat up on the US, while at the same time conveniently forgetting about their own lack of action.
it's a bit like watching a car accident happen on television. You can scream 'stop, don't do it!' all you like but there's fuck all you can do to prevent it from happening.
That's what you'd expect the people at the scene to try to do.

"In life, you have to face that some days you'll be the pigeon and some days you'll be the statue."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 134 by Quetzal, posted 09-23-2006 11:51 AM Quetzal has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 140 by Quetzal, posted 09-24-2006 8:00 PM Legend has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024