Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,437 Year: 3,694/9,624 Month: 565/974 Week: 178/276 Day: 18/34 Hour: 2/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Thanking God in our National Anthem
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 16 of 23 (285744)
02-10-2006 7:53 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by nwr
02-10-2006 7:27 PM


quote:
It is my understanding that, at least in some states, students are required to recite the pledge of allegiance.
This may be true; however, it is my understanding that if it is, then those states are violating the law since it is unconstitutional to force student to recite the pledge.
The relevant question for the state that have "voluntary" recitations for the pledge is whether having state sanctioned recitation of the pledge creates an evironment where the student feels coerced into reciting the pledge with the others despite it being "voluntary".
There have also been incidents where a student exercises her right to "sit out" and ends up being verbally criticized by the teacher in front of the class.

"Intellectually, scientifically, even artistically, fundamentalism -- biblical literalism -- is a road to nowhere, because it insists on fidelity to revealed truths that are not true." -- Katha Pollitt

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by nwr, posted 02-10-2006 7:27 PM nwr has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 18 by ReverendDG, posted 02-10-2006 10:53 PM Chiroptera has replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 437 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 17 of 23 (285760)
02-10-2006 9:02 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by nwr
02-10-2006 7:27 PM


It may vary from state to state. It is my understanding that, at least in some states, students are required to recite the pledge of allegiance. If so, this is not a matter of free speech. It is a matter of coercing students into expressing particular beliefs.
I am against all such coercion, even without the "under God" phrase.
I completely agree. Believing in God is a choice. Being forced into anything is wrong IMO.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by nwr, posted 02-10-2006 7:27 PM nwr has not replied

  
ReverendDG
Member (Idle past 4132 days)
Posts: 1119
From: Topeka,kansas
Joined: 06-06-2005


Message 18 of 23 (285771)
02-10-2006 10:53 PM
Reply to: Message 16 by Chiroptera
02-10-2006 7:53 PM


i remember back in grade school/high school when we did this, most of the time i would stand and do nothing, the teacher would see me and give me dirty looks.. i just find it really terrible that anyone would be ridicualed for not doing it

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by Chiroptera, posted 02-10-2006 7:53 PM Chiroptera has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 20 by Chiroptera, posted 02-11-2006 1:08 PM ReverendDG has not replied

  
Silent H
Member (Idle past 5841 days)
Posts: 7405
From: satellite of love
Joined: 12-11-2002


Message 19 of 23 (285794)
02-11-2006 5:01 AM
Reply to: Message 14 by riVeRraT
02-10-2006 7:08 PM


You mean they are forced to hear free speech, but they don't actually have to say anything.
I believe that varies from place to place. When I was a student I was ordered to say the pledge. In fact I got in a lot of trouble for deliberately mocking the pledge during delivery because I thought it was wrong.
Should I change it?
I was just kiddig around. It is sort of abrasive, but has an interesting, hypnotic quality. If YOU like it then keep it. Screw me for suggesting otherwise.

holmes
"What you need is sustained outrage...there's far too much unthinking respect given to authority." (M.Ivins)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by riVeRraT, posted 02-10-2006 7:08 PM riVeRraT has not replied

  
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 20 of 23 (285839)
02-11-2006 1:08 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by ReverendDG
02-10-2006 10:53 PM


When I was in grade school (early '70s) we also had to say the pledge. No one informed me whether or not it was voluntary at that time. At any rate, at some point it stopped, although I didn't notice that it had stopped until high school, when in American Government class we learned about the controversy.
In kindergarten we would start the day singing My Country 'Tis of Thee. I'm not much into displays of patriotism, but I still have a warm spot in my heart for that song. (And imagine: if that one were our national anthem, they would only have to play it once when the British head of state visits the US, or vice versa!)

"Intellectually, scientifically, even artistically, fundamentalism -- biblical literalism -- is a road to nowhere, because it insists on fidelity to revealed truths that are not true." -- Katha Pollitt

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by ReverendDG, posted 02-10-2006 10:53 PM ReverendDG has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 21 by jar, posted 02-11-2006 1:11 PM Chiroptera has not replied
 Message 22 by Silent H, posted 02-12-2006 6:00 AM Chiroptera has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 416 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 21 of 23 (285841)
02-11-2006 1:11 PM
Reply to: Message 20 by Chiroptera
02-11-2006 1:08 PM


It's also one that the average person can sing, unlike our Anthem.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by Chiroptera, posted 02-11-2006 1:08 PM Chiroptera has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 23 by Rrhain, posted 02-12-2006 8:40 AM jar has not replied

  
Silent H
Member (Idle past 5841 days)
Posts: 7405
From: satellite of love
Joined: 12-11-2002


Message 22 of 23 (285937)
02-12-2006 6:00 AM
Reply to: Message 20 by Chiroptera
02-11-2006 1:08 PM


If you look up the full lyrics of My Country Tis of Thee, you will find it has the same, if not more, references and reverences to God.
I don't think any of this should be surprising. Songs written back then for vast and easy emotional appeal are going to contain references to God. Those appealing to song lyrics to create divisive arguments suggesting the nature of this nation's GOV'T is somehow based on Xianity, are just fishing for material because they can't find it where it counts most... our gov't documents.
And in this case the portions discussing God are not routinely sung at all, so its really fishing for redherring.

holmes
"What you need is sustained outrage...there's far too much unthinking respect given to authority." (M.Ivins)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by Chiroptera, posted 02-11-2006 1:08 PM Chiroptera has not replied

  
Rrhain
Member
Posts: 6351
From: San Diego, CA, USA
Joined: 05-03-2003


Message 23 of 23 (285947)
02-12-2006 8:40 AM
Reply to: Message 21 by jar
02-11-2006 1:11 PM


jar writes:
quote:
It's also one that the average person can sing, unlike our Anthem.
Actually, the average person can sing the National Anthem. The problem is that you won't be able to find a key that most people can sing it in. The National Anthem has a tessitura of a twelfth, which is pretty much what the average voice is capable of. The problem is that not everybody's twelfth covers the same range.
And don't forget, the tune is an old English drinking song, "To Anacreon in Heaven." And like all drinking songs, it has too many verses.
This message has been edited by Rrhain, 02-12-2006 08:44 AM

Rrhain

Thank you for your submission to Science. Your paper was reviewed by a jury of seventh graders so that they could look for balance and to allow them to make up their own minds. We are sorry to say that they found your paper "bogus," specifically describing the section on the laboratory work "boring." We regret that we will be unable to publish your work at this time.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by jar, posted 02-11-2006 1:11 PM jar has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024