I never said a word about your opponents' arguments, therefore I didn't claim victory by declaring anyone correct.
You say you have all the facts about the bible, the only logical conclusion to draw fomr that is that no further facts will matter to you. Thus, my statement about you is correct.
It seems to me that you are the one who put arguments about the bible in this thread when you made the outrageous claim that "if our national leaders support immoral behavior the nation will be exposed to God's punishment. This is the real reason for the health problems already created by the sexual freedom of the last few decades -- it's judgment, the kind of judgment that is built into the sin in this case."
The only possible explanation I can think of for ignoring 100s of years of medical advances in epidemiology and reverting to the dark ages for your medical knowledge is your insistance that you already have all the facts.
If there's any smearing going on, dearie, it's you smearing yourself.
If you insist on claiming that I have smeared you, I ask that you provide the quote, the context and your analysis of how my statement is a smear.
Those who would sacrifice an essential liberty for a temporary security will lose both, and deserve neither. -- Benjamin Franklin