Just to let you know... regardless of what someone else claims... NJ used a form of reductio and it was valid.
To appeal to a difference one feels exists between the two cases, as if that negates the question posited by NJ, is to assume one is correct in the first place in order to simply avoid debate. It is essentially a circular argument, only less credible.
Don't you see how different these cases are? It is so obvious I don't have to answer why my argument can't be used by these other people! Circular, nonsequitor, bs.
Edited by holmes, : nix
holmes
"What a fool believes he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away." (D.Bros)
™ Version 4.2
