Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,889 Year: 4,146/9,624 Month: 1,017/974 Week: 344/286 Day: 0/65 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   How accurate is this email?
truthlover
Member (Idle past 4087 days)
Posts: 1548
From: Selmer, TN
Joined: 02-12-2003


Message 88 of 93 (386417)
02-21-2007 3:44 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by Dan Carroll
02-16-2007 1:41 PM


I'm mostly dodging this political debate as likely not to be fun, but I'm very curious about a couple things you said, Dan. I have not read the whole 87 post thread yet, so if this has been covered, sorry.
I do think that as long as the 2nd amendment is on the books, it should be followed.
Based on only what a couple liberals said to me (so maybe my sources were the exception), I thought it was a typical liberal position that the 2nd amendment referred to militia only, not the right of individual citizens.
I will note that a Google search turned up liberalswithguns.com that says a lot of liberals are pro individual citizens having guns for the sake of national defense. I didn't have time to find any more liberal web sites, because my search almost exclusively turned up anti-liberal web sites that I of course can't use to know the average liberal mind.
As has been explained to you over and over (and over and over) again, liberals don't think manger scenes should be illegal.
Can you explain this to me, too? I'm pretty sure I've heard real news reports about manger scenes being protested. Do you just mean that they ought to be legal but not displayed in publicly owned buildings? Isn't the manger scene about as directly promoting of one religion as things get?
I'm not for characterizing liberals as anything, and I think the OP is ridiculous. I read "Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them," and I found that Al Franken and I mostly agree on the issues he covers, so please don't take this as some sort of attack. I'm really just asking two questions.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by Dan Carroll, posted 02-16-2007 1:41 PM Dan Carroll has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 89 by Dan Carroll, posted 02-21-2007 3:55 PM truthlover has replied
 Message 90 by jar, posted 02-21-2007 4:01 PM truthlover has not replied

truthlover
Member (Idle past 4087 days)
Posts: 1548
From: Selmer, TN
Joined: 02-12-2003


Message 91 of 93 (386432)
02-21-2007 5:04 PM
Reply to: Message 89 by Dan Carroll
02-21-2007 3:55 PM


In a sane world, I would honestly think that anyone who read the 2nd amendment would walk away with that in mind.
I've tried reading it from both viewpoints. I'm scared of guns. I wasn't raised a hunter. I don't own one. But I have trouble seeing the difference between the militia and individual citizens, IF the 2nd amendment is really addressing the militia. If it is, then the militia is the individual citizens, and you have to give them guns and let them be the militia. That's how it was back then.
And I think I'm sane.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 89 by Dan Carroll, posted 02-21-2007 3:55 PM Dan Carroll has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 92 by Dan Carroll, posted 02-21-2007 5:15 PM truthlover has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024