Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,337 Year: 3,594/9,624 Month: 465/974 Week: 78/276 Day: 6/23 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Spelling errors in posts.
arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1362 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 46 of 61 (283784)
02-03-2006 11:31 PM
Reply to: Message 44 by riVeRraT
02-03-2006 11:29 PM


Re: Wanting the best
The bible is written very well, yet many people do not understand it's meaning.
same deal with shakespeare. i think people have a jamesian english mental block.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 44 by riVeRraT, posted 02-03-2006 11:29 PM riVeRraT has not replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2188 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 47 of 61 (283886)
02-04-2006 12:38 PM
Reply to: Message 45 by riVeRraT
02-03-2006 11:31 PM


Re: busted!
quote:
Really really I could care less, I understand what you say, if I don't I will ask you what you meant.
The clothing analogy is a good one; here, our writing is our clothing. How you spell and write indicates how much you care about the overall impression of your competency that you give off.
If you don't care about coming off as intelligent and competent and well-informed, then why should anyone else care about slogging through a post that is more difficult to read or understand?
Again, we are not talking about occasional spelling, syntax, grammar, or punctuation errors. We are talking about consistent carelessness.
If you don't care at all, why should I?
This message has been edited by schrafinator, 02-04-2006 12:39 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by riVeRraT, posted 02-03-2006 11:31 PM riVeRraT has not replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2188 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 48 of 61 (283889)
02-04-2006 12:42 PM
Reply to: Message 44 by riVeRraT
02-03-2006 11:29 PM


Re: Wanting the best
quote:
The bible is written very well, yet many people do not understand it's meaning.
It's written as well as anything put together by a committee and edited and copied many dozens of times can be.
It ain't no great piece of literature, that's for sure.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 44 by riVeRraT, posted 02-03-2006 11:29 PM riVeRraT has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 49 by NosyNed, posted 02-04-2006 2:31 PM nator has not replied

NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9003
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 49 of 61 (283925)
02-04-2006 2:31 PM
Reply to: Message 48 by nator
02-04-2006 12:42 PM


Great liturature
I disagree Schraf. There are parts that have true beauty.
However, as an expository mechanism it is the shits. In addition, it needs a lot of editing. Is it a history or philosophy book? It jumps back and forth and muddles both.
Is it an insite into the thoughts of the common folk of the time? Probably not.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by nator, posted 02-04-2006 12:42 PM nator has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 50 by Michael, posted 02-04-2006 7:53 PM NosyNed has not replied

Michael
Member (Idle past 4656 days)
Posts: 199
From: USA
Joined: 05-14-2005


Message 50 of 61 (284010)
02-04-2006 7:53 PM
Reply to: Message 49 by NosyNed
02-04-2006 2:31 PM


insite
Is it an insite into the thoughts of the common folk of the time? Probably not.
Likely no insights either.
Sometimes it incites.
Cheers.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by NosyNed, posted 02-04-2006 2:31 PM NosyNed has not replied

nwr
Member
Posts: 6409
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 5.3


Message 51 of 61 (284032)
02-04-2006 8:39 PM


Oops
Erroneous post deleted
This message has been edited by nwr, 02-04-2006 08:27 PM

Parasomnium
Member
Posts: 2224
Joined: 07-15-2003


Message 52 of 61 (284306)
02-06-2006 4:22 AM
Reply to: Message 41 by riVeRraT
02-03-2006 11:21 PM


Re: Wanting the best
'Favourite' = British spelling, 'favorite' = American English spelling.
How does the google tool bar spell it? That is what he was preaching to me.
No, he was telling you to do a spelling check at all, any spelling check.
The bible is written very well, yet many people do not understand it's meaning.
Part of being 'written well' is to be comprehensible. If a lot of people do not understand the Bible, then it lacks in clarity, apparently.
I could care less
Actually, you couldn't. That's part of the point of this thread.
This message has been edited by Parasomnium, 06-Feb-2006 09:30 AM

"Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge: it is those who know little, not those who know much, who so positively assert that this or that problem will never be solved by science." - Charles Darwin.
Did you know that most of the time your computer is doing nothing? What if you could make it do something really useful? Like helping scientists understand diseases? Your computer could even be instrumental in finding a cure for HIV/AIDS. Wouldn't that be something? If you agree, then join World Community Grid now and download a simple, free tool that lets you and your computer do your share in helping humanity. After all, you are part of it, so why not take part in it?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by riVeRraT, posted 02-03-2006 11:21 PM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 53 by riVeRraT, posted 02-06-2006 8:03 AM Parasomnium has replied

riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 434 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 53 of 61 (284336)
02-06-2006 8:03 AM
Reply to: Message 52 by Parasomnium
02-06-2006 4:22 AM


Re: Wanting the best
If a lot of people do not understand the Bible, then it lacks in clarity, apparently.
Soley because people do not understand it?
I guess that makes Einsteins theory a flop.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by Parasomnium, posted 02-06-2006 4:22 AM Parasomnium has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 54 by Parasomnium, posted 02-06-2006 8:21 AM riVeRraT has replied
 Message 55 by NosyNed, posted 02-06-2006 9:34 AM riVeRraT has replied
 Message 56 by ramoss, posted 02-06-2006 9:57 AM riVeRraT has not replied

Parasomnium
Member
Posts: 2224
Joined: 07-15-2003


Message 54 of 61 (284344)
02-06-2006 8:21 AM
Reply to: Message 53 by riVeRraT
02-06-2006 8:03 AM


Re: Wanting the best
riVeRraT writes:
I guess that makes Einsteins theory a flop.
Well, considering that Einstein's papers on his theory were intended for fellow physicists, I think his theory was received very well. The Bible however, its intended audience being common people, demonstrably falls short, by your own admission.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 53 by riVeRraT, posted 02-06-2006 8:03 AM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 58 by iano, posted 02-06-2006 8:34 PM Parasomnium has not replied
 Message 59 by riVeRraT, posted 02-06-2006 11:45 PM Parasomnium has not replied

NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9003
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 55 of 61 (284358)
02-06-2006 9:34 AM
Reply to: Message 53 by riVeRraT
02-06-2006 8:03 AM


Einstein's theory
SR and GR are totally clear. They are unambiguous. That doesn't mean they are easy to read. Everyone who works hard enough and is smart enough to understand the math comes to the same conclusion about the nature of spacetime and gravity (and all the other consequences of the theory).
"Understandable" has multiple meanings. Something written in a language foreign to you can be totally unambiguous and understandable. Just not to you (yet).
The Bible has been translated to many languages and studied over centuries and yet everywhere is argued over. EvC is a microcosm of that.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 53 by riVeRraT, posted 02-06-2006 8:03 AM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 60 by riVeRraT, posted 02-06-2006 11:52 PM NosyNed has not replied

ramoss
Member (Idle past 631 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 08-11-2004


Message 56 of 61 (284362)
02-06-2006 9:57 AM
Reply to: Message 53 by riVeRraT
02-06-2006 8:03 AM


Re: Wanting the best
The purpose of Einstiens theory is differnet that the purpose the bible. THe bible is supposed to be communicating spiritual truth to people. Einstiens paper is to describe a model of the physical world that is not intutive to most people. It is geared to scientiest. The bible is supposed to be geard to the masses.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 53 by riVeRraT, posted 02-06-2006 8:03 AM riVeRraT has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 57 by Phat, posted 02-06-2006 10:13 AM ramoss has not replied

Phat
Member
Posts: 18292
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.1


Message 57 of 61 (284363)
02-06-2006 10:13 AM
Reply to: Message 56 by ramoss
02-06-2006 9:57 AM


Re: Wanting the best
This topic is getting complex! Im gonna sit a spell until my head clears!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 56 by ramoss, posted 02-06-2006 9:57 AM ramoss has not replied

iano
Member (Idle past 1959 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 58 of 61 (284503)
02-06-2006 8:34 PM
Reply to: Message 54 by Parasomnium
02-06-2006 8:21 AM


Re: Wanting the best
The Bible however, its intended audience being common people, demonstrably falls short, by your own admission.
This it does but the Bible also tells us that even though it is meant for all, not all will pick it up. And that the choice to do so (or not) is theirs. Incidently, "falling short" IIRC is the translation of the original word which we now refer to as 'sin'. It derives from an old archery expression "fall short of the (Gods) target"
If so, the Bible cannot fall short - a book cannot sin. Only man can do that.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by Parasomnium, posted 02-06-2006 8:21 AM Parasomnium has not replied

riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 434 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 59 of 61 (284523)
02-06-2006 11:45 PM
Reply to: Message 54 by Parasomnium
02-06-2006 8:21 AM


Re: Wanting the best
demonstrably falls short, by your own admission.
That is not what I said or meant.
The point was that there must be an effort on the persons behalf trying to read it. Any book that has 3 million words in it, must take a little effort, just like Einstiens theory.
But on the other hand, sometimes God just shows up, and you don't even have to read about it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by Parasomnium, posted 02-06-2006 8:21 AM Parasomnium has not replied

riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 434 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 60 of 61 (284524)
02-06-2006 11:52 PM
Reply to: Message 55 by NosyNed
02-06-2006 9:34 AM


Re: Einstein's theory
The Bible has been translated to many languages and studied over centuries and yet everywhere is argued over. EvC is a microcosm of that.
I guess because finding God is not as simple as math. There are 6 billion people in the world, each individual, and their path to find God all different. Takes quite the book to express God's word. But I think that is only half of it, the other half is up to people. I hold myself accountable to everyone I let down, which in here may be a lot of people, but look at what I am dealing with.
I consider most people in here very smart. I consider myself smart, but not educated in the same things as most in here. But my own intellect (or the lack thereof) was what held me back from God sometimes. Not the words in the bible.
Once I felt what I felt, the words became extremely clear to me.
Narrow is the road. I'm not sayin I'm on it, but I am trying.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 55 by NosyNed, posted 02-06-2006 9:34 AM NosyNed has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024