Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,792 Year: 4,049/9,624 Month: 920/974 Week: 247/286 Day: 8/46 Hour: 3/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Worst Creationist Argument Ever?
Modulous
Member
Posts: 7801
From: Manchester, UK
Joined: 05-01-2005


Message 6 of 62 (410945)
07-18-2007 4:24 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by iceage
07-18-2007 2:43 AM


On a more important note, does anyone perform a details microscopic analysis of every jar of peanut butter to see if any of the life forms present within it originated there?
Of course, he has falsified one argument - that life originated under semi-vacuum conditions in a jar of peanut butter. Now we just need to find someone whose ever made that argument...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by iceage, posted 07-18-2007 2:43 AM iceage has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by dwise1, posted 07-18-2007 11:43 AM Modulous has replied

  
Modulous
Member
Posts: 7801
From: Manchester, UK
Joined: 05-01-2005


Message 9 of 62 (410954)
07-18-2007 6:03 AM
Reply to: Message 7 by bluegenes
07-18-2007 5:38 AM


As for the O.P. question, is it the worst creationist argument ever, there's heavy competition for that prize, as you know.
I think the strongest contender might have to be the argumentum ad bananum.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by bluegenes, posted 07-18-2007 5:38 AM bluegenes has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by bluegenes, posted 07-18-2007 7:06 AM Modulous has not replied

  
Modulous
Member
Posts: 7801
From: Manchester, UK
Joined: 05-01-2005


Message 22 of 62 (411018)
07-18-2007 2:24 PM
Reply to: Message 12 by dwise1
07-18-2007 11:43 AM


Very problematic. How could you distinguish between organic matter that originated within the jar from the organic matter that had been placed into the jar at the packing plant?
Unless something incredibly unlikely happened, the organic matter placed in the jar would have evidence of billions of years of evolution whereas the the new life wouldn't. It is thus unlikely that the two would life forms would be regarded as even remotely related after molecular analysis (I know I said microscopic, but I was being wrong at the time).
A related problem with new life forming in the present day, besides being able to distinguish it from life that's already existing, is that there's a name for that new life: food! In other words, the life forms that are already present will make lunch out of new organic matter that might form spontaneously.
Absolutely - the peanut butter jar is an extremely harsh environment for the origination of life.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by dwise1, posted 07-18-2007 11:43 AM dwise1 has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024