Moose writes:
I'm not denying that Saddam was a very bad person. The question is, does Iraq need a "bad" (but not "very bad") person in order to function? Is Iraq now looking at decades of civil war, perhaps until a neo-Saddam finally takes charge?
Moose, your point is well taken. Until our ousting of Saddam, the presence of Saddam was indeed a stabilizing factor in the Middle East in that the Shehites and the Sunni Islamists (both violent ideologies) worked to hold one another at bay.
Now that the US of A is bolstering the Sheahites so as to establish a Sheahite
Jehadist terroristic fundamentalist ideology as the prime entity in the entire Middle East, Islam will now predominate the agenda for the entire region and the agenda of Islam for the anihilation of Israel as a nation will be advanced by the forces of the US of A.
Edited by Buzsaw, : Failure to preview. Had to fix quotation.
BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The immeasurable present eternally extends the infinite past and infinitely consumes the eternal future.