Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,848 Year: 4,105/9,624 Month: 976/974 Week: 303/286 Day: 24/40 Hour: 2/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Immigration issues
Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3990
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 6.9


Message 10 of 130 (384510)
02-11-2007 8:32 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by gene90
02-11-2007 8:15 PM


Re: Immigration
gene90 writes:
America does take a lot of flack for being too restrictive in granting citizenship, but we have a fairly liberal policy compared to other first-world nations like Japan (forget about it) Australia (you must be less than 45 and have demonstrable job skills; although there are other ways in if you happen to be rich) and the Netherlands (must speak Dutch). I don't think these last two are unreasonable by the way, but imagine the outcry if the United States were to do this.
Oh you bet the American middle class needs competition from other countries: open the doors freely to educated, English-speaking immigrants from India, Korea, Singapore, and Pakistan and watch a new white welfare class develop.
The "outcry if the United States were to do this" would come from employers who don't need language fluency or skilled workers: they need cheap field, unskilled, and semi-skilled labor for short wages.
Most of those employers are conservative Republicans--that's why the one measure likely to stem illegal immigration (aggressive penalties on knowing employers of illegal immigrants) never gets anywhere in Congress.
Crime drops in cities with high numbers of illegal immigrants; they pay FICA and other taxes without any likelihood of gaining benefits.
The "dole" is not something they are ever likely to see.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by gene90, posted 02-11-2007 8:15 PM gene90 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 15 by gene90, posted 02-11-2007 8:48 PM Omnivorous has replied

  
Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3990
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 6.9


Message 16 of 130 (384519)
02-11-2007 9:07 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by gene90
02-11-2007 8:48 PM


Re: Immigration
gene90 writes:
I see something in your text about an "outcry", omnivorous, but otherwise nothing vaguely similar to the text of my post.
Why would you expect my post to be similar to yours? Yours was irrelevant in its insinuations and erroneous in its assumptions.
Mine was not.
gene90 writes:
If evil, far-right, reactionary countries like Australia and the Netherlands can be selective in who they admit, why can't the United States?
Bobby gets to why can't I?
If China can muzzle its press and intellectuals, and privatize its community-owned property to enrich its new party-member capitalist class, why can't we? Does that work for you? If Iran can establish a theocracy, why can't we?
As I pointed out, the bar to strong enforcement of immigration laws is not a soft-hearted liberal conspiracy but the huge corporate demand for cheap labor. The GOP-dominated Congress had several years to enact stiffer penalties (and strong enforcement programs) on those employers and refused to do so.
Conservatives seem clear on the notion that demand must be stifled to stop the flow of drugs, yet wear blinders when it comes to the flow of cheap labor. If you want stronger enforcement, look to the corporate employers, not to liberals who advocate the free migration of labor. The employers of illegal immigrants collect FICA tax, income tax, state tax, etc.: the immigrant workers are extremely unlikely to cash in on those benefits--often the employers simply pocket the withholdings. Most illegal immigrant regularly suffer the indignity of unpaid wages because they fear deportation--how likely are they to demand the benefits for which they paid taxes?
By the way, I see nothing substantive in your reply. Got substance?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by gene90, posted 02-11-2007 8:48 PM gene90 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 20 by gene90, posted 02-11-2007 9:29 PM Omnivorous has replied

  
Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3990
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 6.9


Message 25 of 130 (384530)
02-11-2007 9:53 PM
Reply to: Message 20 by gene90
02-11-2007 9:29 PM


Re: Immigration
We need the labor that Mexico, Central, and South America can provide. They need work.
They are, frankly, in greater proportions than our existing population, hard-working, honest people. The primary opposition to their presence here is racist and xenophobic, waxing and waning with the electoral cycle.
They are our neighbors--why should we look further, to nations more distant and cultures even more distantly related to our own, for the labor (and taxpayers) we need? In many cases, the economies of their home countries are unable to provide them with a decent living because their traditional ways of life have been discarded for extractive and exploitative resource and agribusiness endeavors that feed rootless, globalized corporations.
In many cases, they don't come here looking for a better life but rather any life at all. They come here because there is no longer a life worth living where they were--sometimes because our "banana/beef" plantations destroyed their traditional, sustainable ways of life, sometimes because we supported the death-squad militarist son of a bitch who bankrupted their nation and polity.
In those cases where our factories have relocated to their lands, the relocation occurred because the labor and environmental protections that serve us (however poorly) are not present there, and the new boss is just like the old boss, the land despoiled, and all parents can offer their children is the same grinding poverty they inherited.
Gene90 writes:
However, I am curious about the lack of indignation for the policies of the Netherlands, Japan, and Australia. And let's not forget Sweden, where being a Nordic immigrant makes all the difference.
In fact, there are a lot of countries with more restrictive policies--just about the entire first world, come to think of it--whose immigration policies range from the sensible, to the excessively restrictive, to the downright xenophobic. Why does America get singled out?
By me?
Because I am a U.S. citizen. I bear moral, ethical and political responsibility for those policies I advocate, those I tolerate, and the consequences of my opposition to others.
Because I grew up in a poor working class family, and I know that someone is being screwed coming and going when I see it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by gene90, posted 02-11-2007 9:29 PM gene90 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 26 by gene90, posted 02-11-2007 10:03 PM Omnivorous has not replied
 Message 44 by Hyroglyphx, posted 02-12-2007 4:19 PM Omnivorous has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024